The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Recent Prediction
This prediction includes detailed insights.
Predicted Winner: Loma Lookboonmee
Weight Class: Women's Strawweight
Final Confidence: 2.8
Value: -30.0%
Reason: Base confidence < 10, decreased by 30%
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Score: 4
Odds:
Loma Lookboonmee: -125
Jaqueline Amorim: +105
Loma Lookboonmee brings authentic Muay Thai credentials to the octagon. She holds a 10-4 UFC record and has shown consistent evolution in her MMA game. Her signature techniques center on clinch work and counter striking.
Signature Techniques:
Defensive Elbows on Kick Catches: When opponents grab her kicks, Lookboonmee punishes them with sharp elbows. Against Bruna Brasil, she opened a significant cut over Brasil's eye using a three-part sequence: a left elbow spike, head collision, then a chopping right elbow. This technique has deterred many opponents from committing to kick catches.
Step-In Rear Leg Attacks: Lookboonmee establishes rhythm with low kicks using her right leg, then uses the same motion to deliver front kicks to the midsection or transition into Superman punches. Against Brasil, this variety kept her opponent guessing and unable to establish offense despite physical advantages.
Technical Clinch Getups: Her defensive grappling has improved dramatically. Against Istela Nunes, she used cross-wrist getups from half guard and octopus guard escapes to neutralize takedown advantages without burning excessive energy.
Technical Evolution:
Her recent wins over Nunes and Brasil showed improved defensive grappling and more efficient countering mechanics. She's moved away from traditional Muay Thai stances toward a more mobile, defense-oriented approach that accommodates takedown threats. Her striking has become more MMA-specific, using elbows as primary counter weapons.
Path to Victory:
Lookboonmee wins by keeping the fight standing, using her counter elbows to punish Amorim's entries, and utilizing her clinch strength to prevent sustained grappling exchanges. Her body strikes (1.65 landed per minute) could slow Amorim's wrestling pace.
Kick-Based Takedown Vulnerability: Against Alexia Thainara, her kicking game became a liability. Thainara stuck to her kicks and converted them to takedowns consistently. The fight insight noted: "Any time that Lookboonmee kicked, she stuck to the kick and took her down, which a lot of Lookboonmee's opponents haven't been able to do." Amorim could exploit this pattern if she commits to catching kicks despite the elbow threat.
Severe Size Disadvantage: Lookboonmee is undersized for strawweight. At 61 inches of reach versus Amorim's 68 inches, she faces a 7-inch reach deficit. Against larger opponents who can physically impose themselves, her technical advantages diminish. Thainara used her size to grind Lookboonmee down over three rounds.
Questionable Decision-Making Under Pressure: Against Denise Gomes, Lookboonmee made puzzling tactical choices, including voluntarily going to the ground when winning on the feet and turning her back after a takedown. When her primary gameplan fails, she sometimes makes errors that create openings for opponents.
Jaqueline Amorim is a second-degree BJJ black belt with multiple IBJJF world championships. She holds a 10-2 record with 7 submission victories. Her grappling is elite, but her recent loss to Mizuki exposed significant holes.
Signature Techniques:
Guard Pull to Immediate Submission Threat: Against Cory McKenna, Amorim jumped guard off a caught kick and immediately locked a triangle within seconds. She's comfortable conceding top position to threaten submissions. Her lasso guard background translates to dangerous armbar and triangle setups from bottom.
Positional Transitions and Submission Chains: Against Vanessa Demopoulos, she moved from takedown to guard pass to mount to back control seamlessly. She threatened rear-naked choke, then transitioned to armbar when defense was mounted. Against McKenna, she chained triangle attempts into armbar finishes.
Explosive Takedown Entries: Amorim scores takedowns within seconds of rounds starting. Against Polyana Viana, she dove into a double leg in the first five seconds. Her 2.16 takedowns per fight shows consistent ability to get fights to the ground.
Technical Evolution:
After her loss to Sam Hughes, Amorim acknowledged needing to integrate striking and wrestling with her jiu-jitsu for MMA. Her subsequent wins showed improved wrestling-based takedowns rather than pure guard pulling. She's now 4-1 since that debut loss.
Path to Victory:
Amorim wins by securing early takedowns, establishing back control, and finishing with her elite submission game. Her 3.78 submissions attempted per fight is among the highest in the division.
Catastrophic Cardio Collapse: Against Mizuki at UFC 321, Amorim dominated Round 1 with takedowns and submission threats, then completely fell apart. By Round 3, her takedown attempts came "practically in slow motion." Against Sam Hughes, she gassed after one round and lost a decision. This is a recurring pattern that hasn't been fully resolved.
Inability to Finish Submissions Against Tough Opponents: Despite achieving dominant positions against Mizuki, Amorim failed to secure any finishes. She threatened rear-naked choke, kneebar, triangle, and armbar but couldn't convert. When opponents can survive her early onslaught, she lacks the tools to win later rounds.
Striking and Clinch Vulnerability: Against Mizuki in Round 3, she absorbed knees and uppercuts in the clinch that nearly dropped her. Her 0.55 significant striking defense percentage means she absorbs significant damage when forced to stand. She has no answer for skilled strikers when her wrestling fades.
Guard Pulling Desperation: When takedowns fail, Amorim resorts to pulling guard, which gives opponents top position. Against Hughes, this allowed Hughes to land ground-and-pound. Against Mizuki, it gave away rounds.
Lookboonmee's Weapons vs Amorim's Gaps:
Lookboonmee's counter elbows could punish Amorim's takedown entries. Amorim shoots from distance and telegraphs her attempts when fatigued. Lookboonmee's defensive grappling has improved enough that she can potentially survive early submission threats and force the fight into later rounds where Amorim deteriorates.
Lookboonmee's body strikes could compound Amorim's cardio issues. Her 1.65 body strikes landed per minute could slow Amorim's wrestling pace if she can land them during exchanges.
Amorim's Weapons vs Lookboonmee's Gaps:
Amorim's willingness to catch kicks and commit to takedowns mirrors Thainara's successful gameplan. Lookboonmee's 45% takedown defense ratio suggests she'll end up on her back at some point. If Amorim can replicate Thainara's approach of absorbing elbows to secure grappling positions, she has a path to victory.
Amorim's 7-inch reach advantage allows her to establish range for takedown entries. Lookboonmee's size disadvantage becomes pronounced against grapplers who can physically impose themselves.
Historical Parallel:
Lookboonmee's loss to Thainara provides the blueprint for beating her: commit to catching kicks, accept minor elbow damage, and convert to takedowns. However, Thainara maintained her pace for three rounds. Amorim has shown she cannot maintain that pace.
Early Rounds (1-2):
Amorim will likely secure at least one takedown in the first round. Her explosive entries are difficult to stop entirely. Lookboonmee's best defense is making Amorim pay with elbows during transitions and using her improved getup techniques to return to standing.
If Lookboonmee can survive the first round without getting submitted, the fight shifts in her favor. Her counter striking and body work can accumulate damage while Amorim expends energy on grappling exchanges.
Mid-Fight Adjustment (Round 2):
This is the critical phase. Amorim's cardio typically collapses here. Against Hughes, she was "definitely gassed" by Round 2, shooting from too far out and pulling guard defensively. Against Mizuki, she made the tactical error of jumping guard when takedowns failed.
Lookboonmee should increase her offensive output as Amorim slows. Her clinch strength becomes more effective against a fatigued opponent.
Championship Rounds:
If this fight reaches Round 3, Lookboonmee holds significant advantages. Amorim's takedown attempts become "practically in slow motion" when gassed. Lookboonmee's conditioning and pace management allow her to maintain output through three rounds, as shown in her decision wins over Brasil and Nunes.
Amorim's cardio is the deciding factor. Her collapse against Mizuki came against an opponent returning from a 25-month layoff. Lookboonmee is a more active, better-conditioned fighter who can push pace.
Lookboonmee's recent loss to Thainara was by decision, not finish. She survived three rounds of grappling-heavy fighting. Amorim has never won a decision in the UFC.
Amorim's 0% takedown defense ratio is misleading. She often pulls guard intentionally. But this tactic has cost her rounds and fights when she can't finish.
Lookboonmee's striking defense (43%) is poor, but Amorim's striking output (2.43 significant strikes per minute) isn't threatening enough to exploit it.
The reach disadvantage matters less in the clinch. Lookboonmee's Muay Thai clinch work can neutralize Amorim's length advantage if she can avoid extended ground exchanges.
The model's confidence in Lookboonmee stems from several key statistical factors:
Odds increased the prediction score by 5.0. Lookboonmee is the favorite at -125, and the model weights this heavily.
Recent Significant Striking Impact Differential increased the score by 2.0. Lookboonmee's recent 21.24 differential versus Amorim's 8.78 shows she's been landing more effectively.
Recent Win Percentage increased the score by 2.0. Both fighters are 2-1 in their last three, but Lookboonmee's overall body of work is stronger.
Striking Defense Percentage increased the score by 2.0. Lookboonmee's 43% defense versus Amorim's 37% gives her an edge in absorbing damage.
TrueSkill decreased the score by 1.0. Amorim's lower sigma (higher uncertainty) reflects her limited UFC experience.
Reach decreased the score by 1.0. Amorim's 7-inch reach advantage is noted but not decisive.
Recent Takedowns Attempted per Fight decreased the score by 1.0. Amorim's 6.62 attempts per fight shows her grappling intent, which the model views as a threat.
WolfTicketsAI has a strong track record with Lookboonmee: - Correctly predicted her win over Istela Nunes (0.77 confidence) - Correctly predicted her win over Bruna Brasil (0.60 confidence) - Correctly predicted her win over Elise Reed (0.81 confidence) - Correctly predicted Thainara would beat her (0.65 confidence)
The model has been 4-0 on Lookboonmee fights, demonstrating reliable assessment of her capabilities.
For Amorim, the model has been 3-1: - Correctly predicted her wins over Demopoulos, McKenna, and Ruiz - Incorrectly predicted her to beat Mizuki (0.78 confidence)
The Mizuki miss is notable. The model overvalued Amorim's grappling and underestimated her cardio issues. This fight presents similar dynamics.
Lookboonmee's path to victory is clear: survive the early grappling exchanges, make Amorim pay with elbows and body work, and capitalize on the Brazilian's inevitable cardio collapse. Amorim's recent loss to Mizuki exposed that her submission game cannot carry her through three rounds against prepared opponents.
Lookboonmee has the conditioning, defensive grappling, and striking tools to weather Amorim's storm and take over as the fight progresses. Her Muay Thai clinch work and counter striking become increasingly effective against a fatigued opponent.
WolfTicketsAI picks Loma Lookboonmee to win this fight.
| Stat | Loma Lookboonmee | Jaqueline Amorim | Weight Class Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Stats | ||||
| Age | 30 | 30 | 32 | |
| Height | 61" | 63" | 63" | |
| Reach | 61" | 68" | 63" | |
| Win Percentage | 71.43% | 83.33% | 75.54% | |
| Wins | 10 | 11 | ||
| Losses | 5 | 2 | ||
| Wins at Weight Class | 7 | 4 | ||
| Losses at Weight Class | 3 | 2 | ||
| Striking Stats | ||||
| Striking Accuracy | 62.50% | 60.77% | 52.23% | |
| Significant Striking Accuracy | 55.84% | 50.75% | 44.77% | |
| Strikes Landed Per Minute | 5.720 | 5.126 | 5.688 | |
| Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute | 3.667 | 2.428 | 3.776 | |
| Knockdowns per Fight | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.133 | |
| Striking Impact Differential | 15.80% | -4.33% | 4.02% | |
| Significant Striking Impact Differential | 16.10% | 2.50% | 2.86% | |
| Striking Output Differential | 14.60% | -3.67% | 2.76% | |
| Significant Striking Output Differential | 16.70% | 0.00% | 1.11% | |
| Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 61.49% | 63.16% | 84.35% | |
| Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 77.91% | 108.15% | 116.22% | |
| Striking Defense Percentage | 53.10% | 54.89% | 52.13% | |
| Takedown and Submission Stats | ||||
| Submissions per Fight | 0.107 | 3.777 | 0.556 | |
| Takedowns per Fight | 1.812 | 2.158 | 1.489 | |
| Takedowns Attempted per Fight | 3.624 | 5.935 | 3.758 | |
| Takedown Defense | 45.16% | 0.00% | 81.91% | |
| Takedown Accuracy | 50.00% | 36.36% | 38.83% | |
| Head Stats | ||||
| Head Strikes Landed per Minute | 1.350 | 2.050 | 2.332 | |
| Head Strikes Attempted per Minute | 3.361 | 3.867 | 6.055 | |
| Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 1.542 | 1.835 | 2.139 | |
| Body Stats | ||||
| Body Strikes Landed per Minute | 1.649 | 0.270 | 0.914 | |
| Body Strikes Attempted per Minute | 2.366 | 0.701 | 1.327 | |
| Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.618 | 0.234 | 0.848 | |
| Leg Stats | ||||
| Leg Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.668 | 0.108 | 0.530 | |
| Leg kicks Attempted per Minute | 0.839 | 0.216 | 0.698 | |
| Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute | 0.362 | 0.090 | 0.538 | |
| Clinch Stats | ||||
| Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute | 1.322 | 0.054 | 0.484 | |
| Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute | 1.641 | 0.054 | 0.645 | |
| Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.746 | 0.378 | 0.475 | |
| Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sept. 27, 2025 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Alexia Thainara | Alexia Thainara | |
| April 5, 2025 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Istela Nunes | Loma Lookboonmee | |
| Feb. 10, 2024 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Bruna Brasil | Loma Lookboonmee | |
| Feb. 11, 2023 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Elise Reed | Loma Lookboonmee | |
| Sept. 17, 2022 | Women's Strawweight | Denise Gomes | Loma Lookboonmee | Loma Lookboonmee | |
| Nov. 20, 2021 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Loopy Godinez | Loopy Godinez | |
| May 1, 2021 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Sam Hughes | Loma Lookboonmee | |
| Oct. 3, 2020 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Jinh Yu Frey | Loma Lookboonmee | |
| Feb. 22, 2020 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Angela Hill | Angela Hill | |
| Oct. 26, 2019 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Aleksandra Albu | Loma Lookboonmee |
| Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct. 25, 2025 | Women's Strawweight | Jaqueline Amorim | Mizuki | Mizuki | |
| April 26, 2025 | Women's Strawweight | Jaqueline Amorim | Polyana Viana | Jaqueline Amorim | |
| Sept. 7, 2024 | Women's Strawweight | Jaqueline Amorim | Vanessa Demopoulos | Jaqueline Amorim | |
| March 16, 2024 | Women's Strawweight | Jaqueline Amorim | Cory McKenna | Jaqueline Amorim | |
| Aug. 12, 2023 | Women's Strawweight | Jaqueline Amorim | Montserrat Conejo Ruiz | Jaqueline Amorim | |
| April 8, 2023 | Women's Strawweight | Jaqueline Amorim | Sam Hughes | Sam Hughes |