Guilherme Pat vs. Thomas Petersen - UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Duncan Results & AI Breakdown

Winner: Thomas Petersen by Decision - Majority

Fight Info:
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Elevation: 773.00m
Weight Class: Heavyweight
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org…

The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.

The predictions below are shown in dark grey if they were correct, incorxrect predictions are shown in red.
Predictions
WT6 = WolfTickets 6 WT5 = WolfTickets 5 Bet Marginal Red = Incorrect
Fighter
WT6
WT5
WT6 EV
WT5 EV
59%
6
+12.8
9.3

Weighted Scoring Report

Weighted Score for WTAI Prediction

Predicted Winner: Guilherme Pat

Weight Class: Heavyweight

Final Confidence: 4.62

Confidence Adjustments

Value: -30.0%

Reason: Base confidence < 10, decreased by 30%

Value: +10.0%

Reason: Opponent lost by KO/TKO within last 12 months

Fighter History & Outcomes

Guilherme Pat

Weight Change: Staying at usual weight

Fight History:

  • December 13, 2025: Guilherme Pat won against Allen Frye Jr.. The fight ended in round 3 at 5:00. It was a unanimous decision. Additional details: 27 - 30. 27 - 30. 27 - 30.
Thomas Petersen

Weight Change: Staying at usual weight

Fight History:

  • October 11, 2025: Thomas Petersen lost against Vitor Petrino. The fight ended in round 3 at 0:26. Method of victory: KO/TKO.
  • May 3, 2025: Thomas Petersen won against Don'Tale Mayes. The fight ended in round 3 at 5:00. It was a unanimous decision. Additional details: 25 - 30. 26 - 30. 26 - 30.
  • February 1, 2025: Thomas Petersen lost against Shamil Gaziev. The fight ended in round 1 at 3:12. Method of victory: KO/TKO.
  • July 20, 2024: Thomas Petersen won against Mohammed Usman. The fight ended in round 3 at 5:00. It was a unanimous decision. Additional details: 27 - 30. 27 - 30. 27 - 30.
  • February 3, 2024: Thomas Petersen lost against Jamal Pogues. The fight ended in round 3 at 5:00. It was a unanimous decision. Additional details: 28 - 29. 28 - 29. 27 - 30.

Fight Analysis

Analysis: Guilherme Pat vs Thomas Petersen

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Guilherme Pat to Win

Score: 6
Odds:
Guilherme Pat: -112
Thomas Petersen: -108

Guilherme Pat's Breakdown

Pat enters this heavyweight matchup with a perfect 6-0 record, including a dominant UFC debut against Allen Frye Jr. at UFC Vegas 112. That fight showcased exactly why he's dangerous: Pat won the significant strike count 64-33, landing heavy outside leg kicks from the opening bell and snapping Frye's head back repeatedly with straight right hands.

Signature Techniques:

  1. Outside Leg Kicks at Range - Pat opened against Frye with these immediately, establishing distance control and damaging his opponent's base throughout all three rounds. His karate background (black belt in Shotokan) gives him excellent timing on these strikes.

  2. Straight Right Hand/Power Crosses - Against Frye, Pat repeatedly landed clean straight rights that visibly hurt his opponent. One particularly nasty shot in Round 2 made Frye feel the impact immediately.

  3. Elbows in the Clinch - When Frye closed distance, Pat answered with violent elbow strikes against the cage. In Round 3, these elbows further busted up Frye's face and showed Pat can work effectively even when his preferred range is compromised.

Technical Evolution:

Pat's camp at Lotus MMA in São Paulo focused specifically on wrestling defense, physical strength, and sharpening his striking. Against Frye, he stuffed all takedown attempts (100% TDD) while maintaining offensive pressure. His 81-inch reach allows him to work at distance where his speed advantage becomes most apparent.

Path to Victory:

Pat's speed differential was described as "seemingly twice as fast as Frye on the feet." Against Petersen, who has been knocked out twice in his last four UFC fights, that hand speed combined with power crosses represents a serious finishing threat.

Guilherme Pat's Technical Vulnerabilities

  1. Cage Control and Clinch Exposure - Throughout the Frye fight, Pat repeatedly allowed his opponent to push him against the fence. While he worked effectively from that position with elbows and short punches, he gave Frye opportunities to stay in the fight. Against a wrestler like Petersen who landed 9 of 9 takedowns against Mohammed Usman, this tendency could prove problematic if Pat can't break free quickly.

  2. Cardio Concerns in Later Rounds - After an aggressive third-round flurry hunting the finish against Frye, Pat was visibly fatigued. A more dangerous opponent could have capitalized on that window. Petersen has shown he can push pace and maintain pressure.

  3. Untested Grappling - Analysts noted Pat "offers little in terms of grappling" and holds only a blue belt in BJJ. Frye lacked takedown ability to test this, but Petersen's wrestling pedigree (two-time Minnesota State champ, NCJAA national champ) presents a different challenge entirely.

Thomas Petersen's Breakdown

Petersen brings a 2-2 UFC record into this fight, with his wins coming via decision. His wrestling background remains his calling card. Against Mohammed Usman, he landed all 9 takedown attempts and accumulated nearly 14 minutes of control time. That fight showed his ability to grind opponents down when his wrestling connects.

Signature Techniques:

  1. Explosive Takedowns - Against Shamil Gaziev, Petersen landed an explosive takedown just under two minutes in and even took Gaziev's back briefly. His wrestling entries are legitimate threats even against larger opponents.

  2. Leg Kick Volume - Against Don'Tale Mayes, Petersen systematically targeted the legs until accumulating a TKO stoppage. He showed patience in working a single target area until it paid off.

  3. Pressure and Forward Movement - Against Usman, Petersen consistently moved forward, landing combinations including thudding left hands that snapped Usman's head back multiple times. He uses pressure to back opponents up and create wrestling opportunities.

Technical Evolution:

Petersen has shown improved striking accuracy since his regional days. Against Usman, his footwork and volume striking kept his opponent off-balance. But his recent losses expose significant concerns.

Path to Victory:

Petersen needs to close distance, establish clinch control, and drag this fight to the mat. His wrestling credentials are real, and if he can chain takedowns together while avoiding Pat's power shots during entries, he could grind out a decision.

Thomas Petersen's Technical Vulnerabilities

  1. Chin Durability Against Power Punchers - Petersen has been knocked out in two of his last three fights. Against Vitor Petrino, an uppercut-left hook combination put him out cold with his head snapping back dramatically. Against Gaziev, a single right hand midway through Round 1 ended the fight instantly. This pattern suggests serious vulnerability to power shots, and Pat has demonstrated knockout power with his straight right.

  2. Inability to Maintain Top Control - Against Gaziev, Petersen landed an explosive takedown and even took the back, but couldn't keep the larger man down. Gaziev exploded up, and Petersen was caught in the dangerous return to striking range where he got knocked out. If he can't hold Pat down after securing takedowns, he's in trouble.

  3. Size and Reach Disadvantage Management - Petersen stands 6'1" with a 74-inch reach. Against Gaziev (6'4", 78.5-inch reach), he couldn't solve the range problem before getting caught. Pat's 81-inch reach presents an even more significant disadvantage. Petersen struggled to close distance safely against Gaziev, and Pat's speed makes that challenge even harder.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This fight presents a classic striker vs. wrestler dynamic, but the details favor Pat.

Pat's Techniques vs. Petersen's Vulnerabilities: - Pat's straight right hand and power crosses directly target Petersen's exposed chin. Petersen has been knocked out twice recently by single power shots, and Pat showed against Frye that he can land clean power punches consistently. - Pat's outside leg kicks can compromise Petersen's ability to shoot takedowns. If Petersen's lead leg gets chewed up early, his wrestling entries become slower and more telegraphed. - Pat's speed advantage should be even more pronounced than it was against Frye. Petersen has never faced someone with Pat's hand speed at heavyweight.

Petersen's Techniques vs. Pat's Vulnerabilities: - Petersen's wrestling could exploit Pat's untested grappling. If Petersen can get past the striking and establish clinch control, Pat's blue belt BJJ may not be enough to escape. - Petersen's pressure could push Pat against the cage where he's shown willingness to get stuck. From there, Petersen could work for takedowns. - If Petersen can survive early exchanges and drag this into later rounds, Pat's cardio concerns could become a factor.

Historical Comparison: This matchup resembles the Gaziev-Petersen fight in some ways: a powerful striker with reach against a wrestler trying to close distance. That fight ended with Petersen knocked out in Round 1. Pat presents similar dangers with his power and speed.

Fight Phase Analysis

Early Rounds (Rounds 1-2): Pat's speed and leg kicks should establish dominance early. Expect him to work outside leg kicks immediately, just as he did against Frye, while looking to land straight rights when Petersen tries to close distance. Petersen will need to survive this phase and find wrestling entries without eating clean power shots. Given his recent knockout losses, this is the most dangerous period for him.

Mid-Fight Adjustments (Round 2-3): If Petersen survives the early onslaught, he may find more success as Pat potentially fatigues. Pat showed visible fatigue in Round 3 against Frye after hunting the finish. Petersen could look to increase wrestling pressure here, though his own cardio at heavyweight has been questioned.

Late Fight (Round 3): If this goes the distance, conditioning becomes critical. Pat's cardio concerns and Petersen's need to push pace create uncertainty. However, given Petersen's recent knockout losses and Pat's power, the fight likely doesn't reach this phase.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Petersen has been KO'd in 2 of his last 3 UFC fights - This is a major red flag. Against Petrino, an uppercut-left hook combination put him out. Against Gaziev, a single right hand ended it in Round 1. Pat's straight right and hand speed represent exactly the kind of threat that has ended Petersen's nights early.

  • Pat's 81-inch reach vs. Petersen's 74-inch reach - This 7-inch reach advantage allows Pat to work at distance where his speed and power are most effective. Petersen struggled against Gaziev's 78.5-inch reach and couldn't solve the range problem.

  • Petersen's wrestling is real but his top control is suspect - Against Gaziev, he landed a takedown and took the back but couldn't keep him down. Against Pat, failed takedown attempts mean returning to the feet against a faster, more powerful striker.

  • Pat's untested grappling remains a question mark - His 100% TDD against Frye is encouraging, but Frye wasn't a credentialed wrestler. Petersen's wrestling pedigree is legitimate.

  • Petersen has lost more than 50% of his last 5 fights - With a 2-3 record in his last 5 (including pre-UFC), and a 2-2 UFC record, Petersen shows inconsistency at this level.

Understanding the Prediction

The SHAP data reveals why WolfTicketsAI favors Pat:

  • Significant Striking Impact Differential increased the score by 6.0 - Pat's +31 differential in significant striking impact dwarfs Petersen's +4.2. Pat lands harder, cleaner shots.

  • Odds increased the score by 3.0 - The betting market slightly favors Pat, and the model incorporates this information.

  • Reach increased the score by 3.0 - Pat's 81-inch reach vs. Petersen's 74-inch reach is a significant advantage at heavyweight.

  • Recent Significant Striking Impact Differential increased the score by 2.0 - Pat's recent striking effectiveness (+31) far exceeds Petersen's recent numbers (+5.2).

  • Recent Win Percentage increased the score by 2.0 - Pat is 100% recently while Petersen is just 33% in his last 3 fights.

Minor decreases came from Average Striking Output Differential (-1.0), Recent Takedowns Attempted per Fight (-1.0), Recent Significant Striking Output Differential (-1.0), and Striking Defense Percentage (-1.0). These reflect Petersen's wrestling activity and some defensive metrics, but they weren't enough to overcome Pat's advantages.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has never predicted a Guilherme Pat fight before, so there's no track record to reference. This adds some uncertainty given Pat has only one UFC fight.

For Thomas Petersen, the model is 2-1: - Correctly predicted Vitor Petrino to beat Petersen (KO/TKO, Round 3) - Correctly predicted Shamil Gaziev to beat Petersen (KO/TKO, Round 1) - Incorrectly predicted Mohammed Usman to beat Petersen (Petersen won by decision)

The model has correctly identified Petersen as vulnerable against power strikers twice. Both times, Petersen was knocked out. This pattern supports the current prediction.

Warning: Pat has only 1 UFC fight, which limits data reliability. However, his dominant performance and Petersen's recent knockout losses provide enough evidence to support this pick.

Conclusion

Thomas Petersen's chin has failed him twice in his last three fights against power punchers. Guilherme Pat showed against Frye that he possesses exactly the kind of speed and power that has ended Petersen's nights early. Pat's 7-inch reach advantage, superior significant striking impact differential, and hand speed should allow him to land clean before Petersen can establish his wrestling. WolfTicketsAI picks Guilherme Pat to win, and given Petersen's recent knockout losses, a finish is a real possibility.

Stat Breakdown

Stat Guilherme Pat Thomas Petersen
Main Stats
Age 31 31
Height 78" 73"
Reach 81" 74"
Win Percentage 100.00% 71.43%
Wins 6 11
Losses 1 4
Wins at Weight Class 1 2
Losses at Weight Class 0 3
Striking Stats
Striking Accuracy 66.67% 65.34%
Significant Striking Accuracy 64.00% 57.27%
Strikes Landed Per Minute 5.067 6.464
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute 4.267 3.360
Knockdowns per Fight 0.000 0.000
Striking Impact Differential 3.00% 38.00%
Significant Striking Impact Differential 31.00% 4.20%
Striking Output Differential -18.00% 30.80%
Significant Striking Output Differential 14.00% -12.40%
Striking Defense to Offense Ratio 77.63% 62.53%
Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio 82.81% 116.75%
Striking Defense Percentage 61.63% 56.65%
Takedown and Submission Stats
Submissions per Fight 0.000 0.256
Takedowns per Fight 0.000 3.326
Takedowns Attempted per Fight 0.000 7.419
Takedown Defense 100.00% 16.67%
Takedown Accuracy 0.00% 44.83%
Head Stats
Head Strikes Landed per Minute 3.533 2.098
Head Strikes Attempted per Minute 5.867 4.451
Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute 1.133 2.081
Body Stats
Body Strikes Landed per Minute 0.533 1.006
Body Strikes Attempted per Minute 0.600 1.160
Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute 0.800 0.785
Leg Stats
Leg Strikes Landed per Minute 0.200 0.256
Leg kicks Attempted per Minute 0.200 0.256
Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute 0.267 0.136
Clinch Stats
Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute 0.667 0.205
Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute 0.667 0.307
Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute 0.933 0.358
Guilherme Pat History:
Date Weight Red Corner Blue Corner Winner
Dec. 13, 2025 Heavyweight Allen Frye Jr. Guilherme Pat Guilherme Pat
Thomas Petersen History:
Date Weight Red Corner Blue Corner Winner
Oct. 11, 2025 Heavyweight Vitor Petrino Thomas Petersen Vitor Petrino
May 3, 2025 Heavyweight Thomas Petersen Don'Tale Mayes Thomas Petersen
Feb. 1, 2025 Heavyweight Shamil Gaziev Thomas Petersen Shamil Gaziev
July 20, 2024 Heavyweight Mohammed Usman Thomas Petersen Thomas Petersen
Feb. 3, 2024 Heavyweight Thomas Petersen Jamal Pogues Jamal Pogues