UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan

Analysis: Brendan Allen vs Christian Leroy Duncan

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Christian Leroy Duncan to Win

Score: 7
Odds:
Brendan Allen: -135
Christian Leroy Duncan: +115

Brendan Allen's Breakdown

Allen is one of the most complete grapplers in the middleweight division, and his recent run proves it. The man owns 27 wins with a stack of submissions, and his game revolves around dragging opponents into deep water and drowning them with top control and chokes.

His signature weapons:

• Back takes and rear-naked chokes. This is his bread and butter. Against Andre Muniz in February 2023, Allen out-grappled a renowned submission specialist, passed guard, took the back, and finished with a rear-naked choke in the third. He did the same to Krzysztof Jotko, Punahele Soriano, and Kevin Holland. When Allen smells a tired opponent, he hunts the neck.
• Scramble reversals and top control. The de Ridder fight in October 2025 was his masterpiece. He lost Round 1 badly, eating a judo throw and defending submissions from back mount, then reversed position repeatedly in Rounds 2 through 4, banked over 11 minutes of control time, and broke de Ridder with ground-and-pound elbows until the corner stopped it. That is elite grappling IQ.
• Volume jab-to-takedown entries. Against Marvin Vettori in July 2025, Allen used straight punches and collar ties to set up reactive doubles, slipping a jab and shooting a clean double in Round 1. His striking is a setup tool more than a finishing weapon.

Technically, Allen has evolved into a patient positional grappler who prioritizes the back over guard passing. His cardio is a genuine asset; he pushed a relentless pace on de Ridder even on 3.5 weeks notice. He is riding a strong run, winning his last four and going 9 of 11 overall.

Brendan Allen's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Striking defense against technical range strikers. This is the big one. Against Nassourdine Imavov in September 2024, Allen shot takedowns from too far out, got stuffed repeatedly, and ate front kicks to the body and clean boxing all night. Imavov's range and head movement completely neutralized Allen's rigid wrestling-first plan. Duncan is a longer, faster, more creative version of that problem.
• Defensive shell under pressure. Against Vettori, when the Italian opened up with combinations, Allen defaulted to a high static guard, absorbing hooks that looped around his elbows. He eats volume rather than creating angles to exit.
• One-shot power counters. His two UFC losses by KO came against Chris Curtis (December 2021) and Sean Strickland (November 2020, catchweight). When Allen gets predictable with his entries, sharp counter-strikers tag him. His head strikes absorbed sits at 3.05 per minute, which is a leaky number against a knockout artist.

When Allen's wrestling fails, as it did against Imavov, he does not pivot well. He keeps shooting the same shot and gets picked apart. That rigidity is the crack Duncan can exploit.

Christian Leroy Duncan's Breakdown

Duncan is one of the most dangerous and unorthodox strikers in the division, riding a five-fight win streak with back-to-back highlight knockouts and a resume that now includes wins over Jared Cannonier and Roman Dolidze.

His signature weapons:

• Spinning attacks. This is his calling card. He flattened Eryk Anders in August 2025 with a spinning back elbow set up by repeated inside low kicks, breaking the pattern to land the elbow behind the ear. Three months later he dropped Marco Tulio with a spinning backfist in Round 2, then finished with a jab and right hand. Against Cannonier in July 2026, a spinning back kick to the body dropped the veteran in Round 2 before a spinning elbow nearly finished him.
• Range striking with length. At 79 inches of reach, Duncan uses leg kicks, side kicks, and front kicks to keep opponents at the end of his range. Against Dolidze he peppered the Georgian with calf kicks and a flush flying knee to the body before exploding with hooks when he broke the clinch.
• Improved scramble grappling. Duncan is not just a striker anymore. Against Tulio he reversed a takedown, took the back with both hooks, and finished the round dominant. Against Cannonier he reversed position off a trip and scrambled to back control.

His technical evolution is real. He has gone from a reckless karate blitzer to a patient pattern-setter who uses repetition to bait reactions, then breaks the pattern with a fight-ender. His recent striking impact differential numbers are enormous compared to Allen's.

Christian Leroy Duncan's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Takedown defense against relentless grapplers. This is his clearest hole. He lost to Gregory Rodrigues in July 2024 when the Brazilian pressured him into boxing range and controlled him. Against Dolidze he got taken down repeatedly and spent the final round trapped in a body triangle eating short shots. Against Andrey Pulyaev he was taken down and controlled in Round 2. Allen will target exactly this.
• Guard retention and bottom game. When Duncan hits his back, he reaches for premature submissions rather than recovering position. Pulyaev passed his guard with can-opener pressure when Duncan reached for arm attacks. Allen is far more dangerous on top than either of those men.
• Over-aggression hunting the finish. Against Cannonier he whiffed a spinning elbow when sensing a finish and gave up top position. A missed spinning attack is a wide-open invitation for a level change, and Allen times reactive doubles well.

When Duncan's striking is nullified by grappling pressure, as against Rodrigues, he struggles to get off the bottom and his output dries up. That is the exact script Allen wants.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a classic grappler-versus-striker chess match, and the key question is whether Allen can close distance and get Duncan down before Duncan lands something that turns the lights off.

What Duncan does to Allen: Imavov already wrote the blueprint. Duncan's length, leg kicks, and front kicks to the body can keep Allen on the outside and punish his telegraphed, from-distance shots. Allen's habit of shooting from too far out, which Imavov stuffed all night, plays directly into Duncan's wheelhouse. Worse, Duncan's spinning attacks thrive against pressure fighters who walk in straight lines, and Allen pressures in straight lines. Curtis and Strickland both proved Allen's chin can be cracked by sharp strikers, and Duncan hits harder than either.

What Allen does to Duncan: Rodrigues and Dolidze wrote Allen's blueprint. Pressure Duncan, close the distance, and get him to the mat. Once Duncan is on his back, he reaches for subs and gives up position, which is a nightmare against the best back-taker in the division. If Allen can get this fight into a grappling exchange in the championship rounds, his cardio and top control could drown Duncan the way they drowned de Ridder.

The fight hinges on the entry. Allen has to get inside without eating a spinning weapon, and his usual from-distance shot is the worst possible way to do it.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: Advantage Duncan. This is his most dangerous window, exactly when he dropped Tulio, Anders, and Cannonier. Allen tends to feel opponents out early and even lost Round 1 to de Ridder. If Allen is tentative while Duncan is fresh and loading up spinning attacks, this is where Allen gets hurt.
• Mid-fight adjustments: If Allen survives the opening exchanges and starts chaining jab-to-takedown entries like he did against Vettori, the fight shifts. Duncan's takedown defense dropped to a 64 percent recent clip, and he fades positionally when controlled, as Dolidze showed in Round 3.
• Championship rounds: If this reaches deep water, Allen's cardio and grappling are the great equalizers. Duncan has been grappled into exhaustion before. But this is a non-title bout, likely three rounds, which shortens Allen's path and favors Duncan's fast-start finishing game.

Analysis and Key Points

• Duncan's spinning attacks are a live finishing threat early. He KO'd Anders and Tulio in back-to-back fights with spinning weapons, and Allen walks forward in straight lines like both of them did.
• Allen's from-distance shot is a liability. Imavov stuffed it repeatedly and picked him apart. Duncan has the length and leg kicks to do the same.
• KO WARNING: Allen has two UFC KO losses (Curtis, Strickland) and absorbs over 3 head strikes per minute. Against a knockout artist like Duncan, that is a genuine red flag.
• Allen's path is the mat. Rodrigues and Dolidze showed Duncan can be controlled and that his bottom game leaks. Allen is a better grappler than both.
• Three-round distance favors Duncan. Without championship rounds, Allen has less time to drag Duncan into the deep water where he is best.

Understanding the Prediction

The model landed on Duncan with a confidence score of 7, and the SHAP features tell a clear story:

• odds increased the score by 3.0, reflecting the market seeing this as close to a pick-em despite Allen being the betting favorite.
• recent_win_perc increased the score by 3.0. Both men are perfect in their recent runs, but Duncan's five-fight streak with finishes carries weight.
• significant_striking_impact_differential decreased the score by 3.0, and recent_significant_striking_impact_differential by 2.0, pulling toward Allen somewhat, but note Duncan's raw striking impact numbers are enormous.
• trueskill decreased the score by 2.0, correctly reflecting that Allen's TrueSkill (Mu 37.8) sits well above Duncan's (Mu 30.1, with a high sigma of 6.7 signaling uncertainty).
• win_streak_diff increased by 1.0 and recent_takedowns_attempted_per_fight increased by 1.0, the latter a nod to Allen's wrestling volume being a factor the model weighed.
• reach decreased by 1.0, favoring Duncan's 79-inch span over Allen's 75.
• striking_defense_percentage and recent_significant_striking_defense_percentage each decreased by 1.0, reflecting Allen's leaky striking defense as a concern.

The net result still lands on Duncan, driven by the odds, recent form, and reach advantages outweighing Allen's TrueSkill and striking impact edges.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has a strong read on both men. On Duncan, it has correctly called him in four of his wins (Dolidze, Cannonier, Anders, Ribeiro) but missed twice, notably backing his opponents against Tulio and Petrosyan and underrating his finishing power against Tulio. That is a caution: the model has occasionally underestimated Duncan's striking upside, which here it is actually backing.

On Allen, the model has been largely sharp, correctly calling his recent wins over Shahbazyan, Vettori, and Curtis. Notably it got the de Ridder fight wrong, picking de Ridder before Allen's grappling clinic. It also missed on Allen's submission wins over Muniz and Jotko, underrating his finishing on the mat. That history is a flag worth respecting here, since the exact path to an Allen upset is his grappling, which the model has undervalued before.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI sides with Christian Leroy Duncan, and the logic holds. In a likely three-round fight, Duncan's early finishing power, length, and spinning arsenal match up brutally well against an Allen who shoots from distance and walks in straight lines, the exact traits Imavov punished and the exact entries Duncan counters. Allen's path is real and lives on the mat, where Rodrigues and Dolidze exposed Duncan's bottom game, but he has to close distance without getting his lights turned out first. The model's pick is Duncan, and the smart money respects the knockout threat early.

Analysis: Matheus Camilo vs Jai Herbert

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Matheus Camilo to Win

Score: 15
Odds:
Matheus Camilo: -200
Jai Herbert: +165

Matheus Camilo's Breakdown

Camilo is a grappling-first lightweight out of Xtreme Couture who hides his wrestling behind simple boxing. But his last outing flipped the script. Against Nazim Sadykhov at UFC Baku in June 2026, Camilo walked into enemy territory as a +164 underdog and iced the hometown favorite in 91 seconds. He stayed patient through Sadykhov's early kicks, glided off the pressure, then uncorked a perfectly timed counter straight right as Sadykhov stepped in. Sadykhov crumpled, Camilo dropped hammerfists, and the ref waved it off. That performance showed a new dimension: he can finish with his hands, not just his wrestling.

His signature tools:

• Level-change takedown behind the jab-cross. Against Viacheslav Borshchev (Nov 2025), Camilo walked him down with one-twos, then dropped levels late in Round 1 and bundled an upright Borshchev over. He landed 5 of 10 takedown attempts in that fight. His takedown numbers are elite, over 4 landed per fight with a perfect takedown defense ratio on paper.
• Chain-grappling into submissions along the fence. Against Gabe Green, Camilo pressured to the cage in Round 2, attacked an armbar when Green framed, then transitioned smoothly to a triangle for the finish. He keeps hips engaged through submission switches.
• Counter right hand against pressure. The Sadykhov knockout proved he can time an aggressive, forward-moving opponent and make him pay. That matters here.

The technical evolution is real. He went from wrestle-and-stall against Borshchev to patient counter-sniper against Sadykhov. That versatility is the main reason he sits as a sizeable favorite.

Matheus Camilo's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Cardio during high-output grappling. In the Green fight, even in a winning effort, Camilo visibly gassed himself chasing the triangle. His whole Borshchev performance drew criticism for fading late. If Herbert survives the early grappling, Camilo's output drops.
• Predictable striking-to-grappling entries. His jab-cross almost always precedes a level change or clinch entry. A rangy counter-striker who reads that timing can meet him coming in. Herbert's whole game is countering guys who step into him.
• Takedown defense has cracked before. He was submitted by Gabe Green earlier in his career (his first UFC-level grappling test went badly before he reversed the Green narrative). Against a longer opponent who can frame and create space, his entries can stall.

Jai Herbert's Breakdown

Herbert, "The Black Country Banger," is a long, Muay Thai-based southpaw-threat striker with legit one-punch power, 10 of his wins by KO/TKO. He's the taller, rangier man here with a 77-inch reach against Camilo's 69. His last fight against Mandel Nallo (April 2026) was pure chaos: Nallo rocked him four times in the opening minute with high kicks, but Herbert stayed composed, caught Nallo overextending, and dropped him with a counter right, then finished with a three-punch combo and ground-and-pound at 2:05 of Round 1.

His signature tools:

• The one-two and high kick. Against Ilia Topuria, Herbert landed a clean 1-2 into a high kick that dropped Topuria early. This is his bread and butter and it's dangerous at range.
• Counter power against aggression. Both the Nallo finish and his style against Khama Worthy show he punishes forward-rushing opponents who come in careless.
• Cage awareness and clinch knees. Against Ludovit Klein he circled off the fence both directions and used a bull guard with knees and elbows in the clinch. He also used defensive knees against Topuria's takedown entries.

Technical evolution has been muddled. Training under Leon Edwards' camp, he kept forcing body locks and wrestling that aren't his strength, most visibly in the Fares Ziam loss, where he won striking exchanges but kept abandoning them to chase takedowns and lost.

Jai Herbert's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Grappling and submission defense. This is the big one. Renato Moicano took him down and tapped him with a rear-naked choke in Round 2. Camilo is a far better grappler than any recent Herbert opponent, and this is exactly the blueprint.
• Backs straight to the cage when hurt. Topuria slipped Herbert's jab, countered with a cross, and when Herbert retreated in a straight line to the fence, Topuria finished him. Camilo's counter right that iced Sadykhov thrives on exactly that straight-line retreat.
• Slow starts and vulnerability to early pressure. Kyle Nelson troubled him early with body kicks and clinch elbows; Nallo nearly finished him in the first minute. Herbert takes damage before he settles in.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a classic grappler-versus-striker setup, and the grappler holds the keys.

• What Camilo exploits: Herbert's takedown defense sits around 50 percent, and he was submitted cleanly by Moicano off a takedown. Camilo attempts nearly 8 takedowns a fight and chains submissions along the fence like he did to Green. If he blends his jab-cross with level changes, he can plant Herbert and hunt the choke or triangle.
• What Herbert exploits: If Camilo shoots sloppy or walks in behind the predictable one-two, Herbert's counter right is live. Herbert dropped both Topuria and Nallo countering guys stepping in. And Camilo's own cardio question means if this hits Round 3 standing, Herbert's volume (5+ significant strikes per minute) could take over.
• Historical parallel: The Moicano fight is the template. A grappler ignored Herbert's striking, closed distance, and took him to the floor. Camilo has the better wrestling entries to repeat it.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: Herbert is dangerous in the opening minute, so Camilo must respect that counter right and not walk in carelessly, exactly the discipline he showed waiting on Sadykhov. If Camilo closes and gets it to the mat, he controls Round 1.
• Mid-fight: If Camilo lands takedowns and threatens submissions, Herbert's defensive grappling, which failed against Moicano, gets tested hard. Expect scrambles where Camilo's chaining ability shines.
• Late rounds: This is Herbert's window. Camilo gassed chasing the Green triangle and faded in the Borshchev decision. Herbert's volume climbs late. If this is standing in Round 3, the pick gets nervous.

Analysis and Key Points

• Camilo's wrestling vs Herbert's takedown defense is the decisive clash. Moicano already showed the template with a Round 2 submission.
• Herbert backs straight to the cage when hurt (Topuria KO), and Camilo just iced Sadykhov with a counter on a man stepping in.
• Herbert's reach (77 vs 69) and volume are his best friends, but only if the fight stays standing.
• Cardio is the live underdog angle: Camilo fades, Herbert surges late. A Round 3 standing battle favors the Brit.
• Warning: Herbert has multiple KO/TKO losses (Topuria, Trinaldo) and a submission loss (Moicano), so his finishing vulnerabilities are well documented.

Understanding the Prediction

The model landed on Camilo with a modest score of 15, and the SHAP features explain why it's close:

• Odds pushed the score up the most (+8), reflecting Camilo's -200 favorite status.
• striking_defense_percentage (+4) and recent_significant_striking_defense_percentage (+2) favored Camilo's defensive numbers.
• recent_win_perc (+3) and recent_takedowns_attempted_per_fight (+3) backed his wrestling volume and momentum.
• reach pulled the score down (-2) because Herbert's 77-inch span is a real edge.
• Smaller bumps from trueskill, significant_striking_impact_differential, and recent_average_striking_output_differential nudged it slightly toward Camilo, while significant_striking_output_differential and average_striking_output_differential shaved a point each the other way.

The net is a lean, not a blowout. The wrestling and defensive metrics tipped it to Camilo.

Past Model Performance

Worth flagging: the model's track record on these two is shaky. It picked against Camilo last time, backing Sadykhov at 0.64, and got it wrong when Camilo scored the first-round KO. On Herbert, WolfTicketsAI is 3-3 across six predictions, missing on the Padilla, Bedoya, and Klein calls. That's a caution. The system has repeatedly misjudged Herbert's live-dog knockout equity and underrated Camilo's finishing. Treat the modest score of 15 as the thin-margin call it is.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI backs Matheus Camilo, and the path is clear: close distance, blend the jab-cross with level changes, and drag Herbert into the grappling hell that Moicano already proved works. Herbert's power is real and his reach is a problem, but his takedown defense and his habit of retreating straight when hurt are exactly the gaps Camilo exploits. The pick is Camilo, most likely by submission or a grappling-heavy decision, with the only real danger being a long night on the feet where Herbert's volume and cardio turn the tide.

Analysis: Loopy Godinez vs Ketlen Souza

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Loopy Godinez to Win

Score: 19
Odds:
Loopy Godinez: -225
Ketlen Souza: +185

Loopy Godinez's Breakdown

Loopy Godinez is a wrestle-first grinder with a purple belt in BJJ and a Mexican boxing base she has steadily sharpened since joining Lobo Gym in Guadalajara. The blueprint is simple and it works: close distance, pin against the fence, and drag opponents into deep water. She averages nearly 7 takedown attempts per fight and lands close to 3, numbers that tell you exactly how she wants the fight to go.

Her signature techniques:

• Catch-the-kick into slam takedown. Against Julia Polastri in March 2025, she snatched a Polastri kick in Round 1 and dumped her with a powerful slam, then went to work from side mount and half guard with elbows to the body and thigh. This is a recurring theme. She punishes strikers who kick without setting it up.
• Clinch entries along the fence into chain wrestling. Against Cynthia Calvillo, she used repeated level changes to kill Calvillo's jab, then fought for double underhooks and single legs against the cage. She rarely telegraphs the shot from distance, preferring to enter in the phone booth where her low center of gravity shines.
• Ankle control from turtle into ground strikes. Against Ariane Carnelossi she grabbed the ankle every time Carnelossi tried to rebuild her base, keeping her flattened and raining strikes. Notably, Carnelossi is a shared opponent, and Godinez dominated her.

Her technical evolution is real. Early on she was a pure grappler who struggled with distance. The Emily Ducote fight showed improved vertical offense, working head and body in combination while cutting the cage. She has become a volume pressure fighter who uses strikes to open the wrestling.

Loopy Godinez's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Fades late and gets wild when tired. Against Polastri in Round 3, she gassed, her output turned sloppy, and Polastri lit her up with uppercuts and right hands, leaving Godinez bloodied. The same pattern showed against Andrade in August 2025, where Andrade came on strong in the later rounds and the analyst thought Andrade may have deserved the nod.
• Struggles with rangy, disciplined strikers who deny the clinch. Angela Hill beat her by managing distance and footwork, never letting Godinez set her pressure game. This is the clearest loss blueprint against her.
• Ground defense against elite grapplers. Mackenzie Dern and Virna Jandiroba both out-grappled her, and Tatiana Suarez submitted her in April 2026. When she cannot be the dominant grappler, she gets controlled.

Ketlen Souza's Breakdown

Souza is a striking-centric counterpuncher with legit one-shot power and a sharp pressure game. Her best work comes off the back foot, timing aggressive opponents as they rush in.

Her signature techniques:

• Inside slip to left hook counter. Against Angela Hill in February 2025 she repeatedly slipped inside Hill's straight right and returned short counters. The Round 1 moment at 3:17 where she slipped a Hill right and buckled her balance was textbook. Note: that fight is recorded as a split decision loss in her record despite the detailed breakdown describing her success.
• Right hand-left hook into back take. Against Yazmin Jauregui she stayed calm under early fire, landed the right-left combo to drop Jauregui, took the back, and finished with a rear-naked choke. That is her highlight finish.
• Combination punching into head kick. Against Ariane Carnelossi in June 2026 she absorbed fence pressure, then exploded with overhand-jab-jab-overhand and finished with a head kick on the way up for a Round 1 KO.

Her evolution shows more kicks, stance switching off inside low kicks, and better cage cutting. But the clinch-heavy grind against Bruna Brasil drew referee warnings for inactivity and showed a less dynamic version of her.

Ketlen Souza's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Submission defense on the ground. Karine Silva leg-locked her in Round 2 in June 2023, and her ground game remains the clearest hole. A grappler who gets top position can threaten.
• Takedown finishing is weak but defense is strong. Her takedown defense sits near 87 percent, but when forced to the mat by a committed wrestler, her offense dries up.
• Predictable forward pressure with hands low. Against Bruna Brasil she winged uppercuts from out of range and ate counter knees to the body in Round 1. Fighters who time her entries can score.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is grappler versus striker, and the key question is whether Godinez can get Souza down and keep her there. Godinez's catch-the-kick slam and fence clinch entries are exactly the tools to exploit Souza's one real weakness, her ground game. Souza got leg-locked by Karine Silva and her offense stalls on her back. If Godinez repeats what she did to Carnelossi, the ankle control and top pressure, she drags Souza into the deep rounds.

But Souza is the harder puncher and the sharper counter striker. She is the stylistic cousin of Angela Hill, the exact archetype that beat Godinez by managing range. If Souza keeps the fight at distance and times Godinez's entries with the inside slip left hook, she can bank rounds and tag Godinez as she tires. Godinez's habit of getting wild and bloodied late, seen against Polastri, plays into Souza's counterpunching.

The deciding factor is takedown defense versus takedown volume. Souza stuffed six of six against Brasil, but Brasil is not a wrestler. Godinez throws volume takedown attempts with real entries, and her shared win over Carnelossi, whom Souza needed a KO to beat, suggests Godinez's grappling is the higher-level tool here.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: Souza is dangerous early with her counters. Godinez must avoid rushing in with her hands low the way Jauregui and Carnelossi did and got clipped. Expect Godinez to feint level changes and catch kicks to enter.
• Mid-fight: If Godinez has landed takedowns and racked up control time, she builds a lead. If Souza has kept it standing, her body work and counters start to compound, much like they did on Hill.
• Late rounds: Cardio is the wildcard. Godinez fades but keeps attempting takedowns. Souza also slows and leans on clinch stalling. Whoever imposed their phase first wins the judges.

Analysis and Key Points

• Shared opponent edge goes to Godinez. She grappled Carnelossi to a dominant decision. Souza beat the same fighter but needed a late KO after conceding fence position the whole fight.
• Souza's power is the live threat. Her Jauregui and Carnelossi finishes prove she can end it in one exchange, and Godinez has been hurt late before.
• Godinez's wrestling targets Souza's only real hole. Karine Silva showed the ground is where Souza breaks.
• Range management is Souza's path. The Angela Hill loss is the exact template Souza fits, so this is not a safe fight.
• Caution flag: Godinez is coming off a submission loss to Tatiana Suarez. Souza is coming off a first-round KO win, so she carries confidence and momentum.

Understanding the Prediction

The model leans on Godinez but the confidence score of 19 is slim, reflecting a close fight.

• Odds moved the score most, up 14 points, reflecting Godinez as the clear -225 favorite.
• recent_win_perc added 3, crediting Godinez's recent form.
• recent_takedowns_attempted_per_fight added 3, the single biggest technical driver and a nod to her wrestling volume against Souza's thinner ground game.
• striking_defense_percentage added 2, and significant_striking_impact_differential, recent_significant_striking_impact_differential, significant_striking_output_differential, and recent_significant_striking_defense_percentage each added 1.
• trueskill subtracted 1, the only meaningful negative, reflecting Souza's higher ceiling uncertainty.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has a strong read on Godinez, going correct on 9 of 11 tracked fights. The misses were telling: it wrongly picked her over Mackenzie Dern and Virna Jandiroba, both elite grapplers who controlled her. That is a caution, because Souza is not that archetype, which supports confidence here. On Souza, the model has been mostly right, including her recent Carnelossi and Brasil wins, but it badly missed her submission loss to Yazmin Jauregui, overrating her at 0.76. That miss is a direct warning: Souza can get finished when the grappling turns against her, which is exactly the lane Godinez wants.

Conclusion

This is a close, live fight, but the path is clear. Godinez's wrestling volume and top control attack the one place Souza consistently breaks, and her shared dominance over Carnelossi outshines Souza's grind-and-KO version of the same opponent. The danger is real if this stays standing, since Souza punches like Angela Hill, the one archetype that beats Godinez. But the smart money and the model agree. WolfTicketsAI backs Loopy Godinez to grind out the win.

Analysis: Andre Fili vs Kai Kamaka III

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Andre Fili to Win

Score: 5
Odds:
Andre Fili: -160
Kai Kamaka III: +135

Andre Fili's Breakdown

Fili is a 14-year UFC veteran with a tool bag most fighters would envy, but he's walking into this one on the back of two straight losses, including a nasty Round 2 TKO against Vinicius Oliveira in June 2026. The book on "Touchy" is well established. He's a switch-hitting counter striker who wants to draw you onto his left hook, manage range with the jab, and pick his moments.

His signature weapons:

• Counter left hook off the lean-back draw. This is the old Fili trade-off. Against Christian Rodriguez in August 2025, he weathered early explosiveness, then started clapping Rodriguez with the counter left hook every time the younger man reached. As the fight wore on and Rodriguez slowed, that left hook became a metronome. It won Fili the split.
• Body kicks and body work. Against Oliveira in Round 1, Fili had the Brazilian grimacing and backing up off repeated body kicks. He hurt a rising finisher with midsection work before fading. The body attack is real when he commits to it.
• Reactive double-leg takedowns. Against Cub Swanson in June 2024, Fili timed reactive doubles as Swanson marched forward, managing pace and nullifying power. His stat line backs this up: 4.8 takedowns attempted per fight and a varied attack that keeps strikers guessing.

His technical evolution has leaned toward patience and pace management over the reckless brawler of his early years. But the recent arc tells a darker story. Fili has lost 2 of his last 3, and the Oliveira loss showed a man who can no longer absorb the damage he once could.

Andre Fili's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Calf kick susceptibility. This is the glaring one. Oliveira hacked away at Fili's lead leg from the opening bell in June 2026, and by Round 2 Fili was visibly limping, unable to move or maintain his jab distance. Kamaka is a dedicated leg kicker who did the exact same thing to Dakota Hope and Danny Chavez. This is a flashing red light.
• Takedowns off his own kicks. Fili gets dumped when he throws kicks. Against Christian Rodriguez he was taken down off a body kick, a recurring issue dating back to the Sodiq Yusuff cut-kick sequence. Any time he commits to a kick, his base is compromised.
• Cage pressure and trigger hesitancy. When Oliveira trapped him on the fence, Fili couldn't create angles or escape, and he failed to finish Oliveira in Round 1 when he had him hurt. He hesitates on offense, and he gets stuck against the cage. At 36, that durability decline is a severe concern given he was just KO'd.

Kai Kamaka III's Breakdown

Kamaka is a wrestle-pressure fighter from Xtreme Couture who grinds, works the body, and leans on volume and cardio over 15 minutes. His career is built on decisions (78% of his wins), and he's a genuinely tough out. But he's 1-2 in his last three fights and coming off his own brutal Round 1 TKO loss to Luke Riley in July 2026.

His signature weapons:

• Sustained body work. This is Kamaka's calling card dating back to his UFC debut against Tony Kelley in August 2020, where his left hook to the liver dropped Kelley's output and set up takedowns. Against Dakota Hope in April 2026, his digging body shots and knees in Rounds 2 and 3 broke Hope down and won him the split.
• Low calf kicks. Kamaka targets the lead leg relentlessly. He landed 77% of his leg strikes against Riley and chewed up both Hope and Danny Chavez's front legs. This is precisely the weapon that ruined Fili's last fight.
• Wrestling and scrambles. His 0.82 takedown defense ratio is elite, and he reverses position well. Against TJ Brown he reversed takedowns and controlled from top. His takedown defense dwarfs Fili's.

His technical evolution shows a fighter who weathers early storms and takes over late, as he did against Hope. But the Riley loss exposed that elite power punchers can time him stepping in and end his night before his grind matters.

Kai Kamaka III's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Chin against power when stepping in. Riley timed Kamaka coming forward and dropped him with a clean right hand in July 2026, then swarmed for the finish. This was his first KO loss in six years, but it happened. Fili has counter-striking pedigree and finishing power historically (10 career KOs), and that counter left hook lives exactly in the lane Kamaka walks into.
• Early defensive boxing under pressure. Against Hope, Kamaka was backed to the cage and dropped in Round 1 before adjusting. He takes damage early and absorbs high volume (3.7 head strikes absorbed per minute). A sharp early starter can hurt him.
• Back exposure in grappling. Against Jonathan Pearce in 2020, Kamaka couldn't prevent back control and got finished by ground-and-pound. Fili has shown back-take and submission awareness historically, though this is a lower-probability path.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a fascinating clash of shared weapons. Both men rely on calf kicks, and both men have been destroyed by calf kicks in their most recent fight. Whoever establishes the leg kick first changes the geometry of this fight.

• Kamaka's calf kicks could exploit Fili's single biggest weakness. Oliveira wrote the blueprint in June 2026: attack the lead leg early, compromise Fili's movement, then pressure him to the cage where he can't escape. Kamaka does exactly this, and his pressure-grind style is tailor-made to trap a 36-year-old Fili on the fence.
• Fili's counter left hook could exploit Kamaka's chin. Riley just showed that timing Kamaka as he steps forward lands clean. Fili's entire game is the lean-back draw into the counter left hook, and Kamaka marches forward in straight lines. If Fili pulls the trigger, which has been his issue, he can catch Kamaka coming in.
• The wrestling edge belongs to Kamaka. Fili's 0.39 takedown defense is poor, and Kamaka's 0.82 takedown defense is elite. Fili can't out-grapple him, and if Fili throws kicks, Kamaka will dump him, just as Rodriguez did off the body kick.

The Christian Rodriguez fight is the model for how Fili wins: survive early, let the counters accumulate, pull ahead late. The Oliveira fight is the model for how Fili loses: calf kicks compromise him, pressure traps him, he gets finished.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: Kamaka's calf kicks are the key variable. If he starts chopping Fili's lead leg the way Oliveira did, Fili's distance management collapses early. But Kamaka is historically a slow starter who gets backed up, and Fili's cleaner counters could tag him coming in. Expect a feeling-out phase with both men hunting the lead leg.
• Mid-fight adjustments: This is Kamaka's territory. He took over against Hope in Rounds 2 and 3 with body work and pressure as his opponent faded. Fili's cardio has historically dipped late, and his lead leg may already be compromised by then. If the fight is close after one round, the trend favors the pressure grinder.
• Championship rounds: Not applicable, this is a three-rounder, which actually helps Fili slightly since Kamaka's grind pays off most over 15 hard minutes. But Kamaka's cardio and body work still tilt the back half his way if he survives the early counters.

Analysis and Key Points

• Both men were just KO'd. Fili by Oliveira, Kamaka by Riley, both in 2026, both brutal. Per our KO heuristic, either man can be finished again. Fili at 36 is the bigger durability concern.
• The calf kick is the whole fight. Fili's lead leg got destroyed by Oliveira. Kamaka is a dedicated calf kicker. This is the clearest technical mismatch on the board, and it favors Kamaka.
• Fili's reach (74" vs 69") and counter power are his lanes. The counter left hook that dropped Rodriguez and the body kicks that hurt Oliveira are his paths. He must pull the trigger, which he failed to do against Oliveira.
• Kamaka's wrestling neutralizes Fili's kicks. Fili gets taken down off kicks, and Kamaka's TD defense is elite while Fili's is poor. Fili cannot win the grappling.
• Both are on skids. Fili lost 2 of 3, Kamaka lost 2 of 3. Two fighters trending down, which adds variance.

Understanding the Prediction

The model landed on Fili with a modest score of 5, and the SHAP data tells a conflicted story:

• Odds were the biggest driver, pushing the score up by 5.0. The market has Fili as the -160 favorite, and the model respects that.
• recent_win_perc added 3.0, which is notable since both men sit at 0.33 recently. Fili's edge here is marginal.
• recent_significant_striking_impact_differential added 2.0 and significant_striking_impact_differential added 1.0, favoring Fili's cleaner striking impact.
• reach added 1.0, reflecting Fili's 5-inch advantage (74" vs 69").
• recent_takedowns_attempted_per_fight added 1.0, crediting Fili's volume wrestling.
• striking_defense_percentage added 1.0.
• On the other side, trueskill pulled the score down by 2.0, which is meaningful. Fili's TrueSkill Mu (29.3) is far higher than Kamaka's (19.5), but Kamaka's high sigma (4.36 vs Fili's 2.32) signals uncertainty the model dislikes.
• recent_striking_impact_differential and recent_significant_striking_defense_percentage each shaved off 1.0.

The net is a thin, odds-driven lean toward Fili rather than a confident read.

Past Model Performance

The model has a mixed but recently strong record on Fili. It correctly called his last two losses (Oliveira and Delgado) and nailed the Lucas Almeida and Dan Ige fights. But it has whiffed on Fili before, picking against him in the Christian Rodriguez and Bill Algeo fights (both Fili wins) and wrongly favoring him against Melquizael Costa. On Kamaka, the model has exactly one data point: it correctly picked Riley to finish him in July 2026. That lone prediction is a caution flag, since the sample is thin and the model has never correctly predicted a Kamaka win or loss outside a finish it was already favored to see.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI sides with Andre Fili, and the pick rides almost entirely on the betting market and his reach and striking-impact edges. Fili's path is clear: use the reach, land the counter left hook that dropped Rodriguez and just caught Kamaka's doppelganger in Riley, and avoid getting his lead leg chopped out from under him. The warning signs are loud, both men were just knocked out, Fili is 36 with fading durability, and Kamaka's calf kicks mirror the exact weapon that ended Fili's last fight. But the model's read is Fili by the slimmest of margins, and that is the call: Andre Fili to win.

Analysis: Malcolm Wellmaker vs Otari Tanzilovi

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Malcolm Wellmaker to Win

Score: 16
Odds:
Malcolm Wellmaker: -225
Otari Tanzilovi: +185

Malcolm Wellmaker's Breakdown

Wellmaker is "The Machine," a switch-hitting bantamweight with scary one-shot power and a growing reputation for walkoff finishes. His first two UFC appearances told you everything about his ceiling. Against Cameron Saaiman in April 2025, he ran a patient pressure game, cut the cage, and baited Saaiman into circling off the fence before pivoting on his lead foot and landing a right hook from a 3 o'clock angle that flatlined him. That was not a wild swing. That was a trap set and sprung with surgical timing.

Then came Kris Moutinho in June 2025. Wellmaker opened with heavy low kicks that wobbled Moutinho in the opening minute, then went to systematic body work. By forcing Moutinho to cover up low, he opened the head. The finish came off a feinted low kick into a winging right hook from the southpaw stance at 2:37 of Round 1. His own words: "The only reason I got the knockout is because he didn't want to get hit to the body no more." That is layered, intelligent striking.

His signature techniques: - Feint-to-right-hook: The low-kick feint into the overhand/winging right hook finished both Moutinho and has been his calling card since the Contender Series. - Pressure-bait-pivot counter: Backing opponents to the fence, giving them an exit, then pivoting into the right hook, exactly how Saaiman went out. - Body jab to high-line: Establishing the body attack to drag the guard down before going upstairs.

The technical evolution is real from Contender Series athleticism to the refined cage-cutting and angle work shown against Saaiman. But the recent trend is ugly. He is 0-2 in his last two, losing a decision to Ethyn Ewing and then getting submitted by Juan Diaz. That is a real downward slide against better competition.

Malcolm Wellmaker's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Back exposure during boxing exchanges: Against Juan Diaz, Wellmaker got his back taken twice off clean boxing exchanges. Diaz ducked under his return fire and ended up riding his back both times before the submission. His commitment to winning striking exchanges leaves him positionally blind to grappling entries disguised as strikes.
• Volume deficiency and telegraphed power: Against Ethyn Ewing, Wellmaker would land his loaded southpaw right hook, then eat three punches in response as Ewing immediately outworked him. The hook was described as being loaded "from outside the cage," meaning it is readable for anyone patient enough to wait for it.
• Leg kick defense when pressuring: Against Saaiman he absorbed several low kicks early because his forward-pressure stance plants his lead leg as an accessible target. His stats confirm it, 0.73 leg kicks absorbed per minute while committing forward.

Otari Tanzilovi's Breakdown

Tanzilovi is a Georgian kickboxer out of Guram Fight Club, a five-time national kickboxing champ and two-time national boxing champ. Coming in he carried a 10-2 record with 7 knockouts and 5 first-round finishes, so the resume says finisher. But you only have one UFC data point, and it is a loss.

In his June 2026 UFC debut against Shane Collins, Tanzilovi took the fight on roughly one week's notice and moved up to featherweight, ten pounds above his natural 135. He opened with inside and outside leg kicks, flashed a spinning back kick to the body, and mixed in single-leg takedowns, going 5 of 9. He also showed counter rights and uppercuts over the top in Round 3 when Collins pressed.

His signature techniques: - Counter right hand: He backed Collins up early with a long right and landed rights over the top in Round 3. - Opportunistic single-leg: He timed takedowns on Collins' forward pressure, reversing position off the cage in Round 1. - Clinch knees: He landed knees to the body, including one spinning off the fence at the end of Round 1.

Here is the problem. He landed 5 takedowns for 4:14 of control and did nothing with them. Zero significant strikes from the ground. Collins stood back up every time. That is wasted energy against a cardio-heavy opponent.

Otari Tanzilovi's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Cardio collapse: He looked gassed by the midpoint of Round 1 against Collins and got pushed backward for 15 straight minutes. All three judges scored it 30-27. He did not win a single round. Against a first-round killer like Wellmaker, gassing early is a death sentence.
• No pressure handling: Collins walked him down the entire fight and dictated where it took place. Tanzilovi could never establish his kickboxing range. Wellmaker is a cage-cutter who specializes in backing men to the fence, exactly the situation that broke Tanzilovi.
• Poor striking defense: His debut numbers are alarming, 36.5% total striking defense and 44.9% significant striking defense. He absorbed 76 significant strikes from Collins. He gets hit, a lot.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a dangerous stylistic trap for Tanzilovi. Wellmaker's entire finishing game is built on the exact setup that undid Tanzilovi against Collins. Wellmaker backs men to the fence, baits the exit, and pivots into the right hook. Tanzilovi's instinct under pressure is to retreat to the cage and fire reactive counters, which is precisely the moment Wellmaker's pivoting hook is designed to catch, see the Saaiman finish.

Tanzilovi's path is clear and it is the same path Juan Diaz used. Disguise takedown entries inside boxing exchanges and take Wellmaker's back when he commits to return fire. Tanzilovi went 5 of 9 on takedowns in his debut and times shots well on forward-moving opponents. If he can drag Wellmaker down and avoid the firefight, he exploits the one proven hole. But Tanzilovi did nothing with top position against Collins, and his cardio cratered in Round 1. Wellmaker's average fight time is 2:14. This likely does not last long enough for Tanzilovi's wrestling to matter.

The low-kick exchange also favors Wellmaker. Tanzilovi likes outside leg kicks, and Wellmaker does absorb kicks when pressuring, but Wellmaker uses the low kick as a feint to detonate the right hook. Every leg kick Tanzilovi throws risks walking into the setup that ended Moutinho.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: This is Wellmaker's kill zone. Six of his finishes come in Round 1. He wobbled Moutinho in the opening minute with low kicks and flatlined Saaiman off a single pivot. Tanzilovi has shown he can be gassed and pushed backward inside the first five minutes. If Wellmaker lands the feint-hook early, it ends.
• Mid-fight adjustments: If Tanzilovi survives the opening storm, his best shot is chaining takedowns and clinch work to drain the exchanges. But his history says he cannot hold men down or do damage on top, and his cardio is already a liability. Wellmaker's back exposure is the one live threat here if it hits the mat in a scramble.
• Later rounds: Unlikely to get here. But if it does, cardio flips toward neither man cleanly. Wellmaker has never been past Round 1 in a win and Tanzilovi has only gone 15 minutes once, losing every round. The data says Wellmaker ends it before this matters.

Analysis and Key Points

• Wellmaker's feint-to-hook is the fight-ender: The same low-kick feint into right hook that flatlined Moutinho matches perfectly against a man who retreats to the fence under pressure.
• Tanzilovi's cardio is a glaring hole: Gassed by the midpoint of Round 1 against Collins, scored out 30-27 across the board.
• Tanzilovi's only path is Diaz's path: Take Wellmaker's back off a botched exchange, as Juan Diaz did twice. But Tanzilovi showed zero ground offense against Collins.
• Warning, Wellmaker was just submitted: He is 0-2 in his last two, losing by decision to Ewing and by submission to Diaz. The downward trend is real and the back-take vulnerability is live.
• Warning, recent KO/sub losses matter: Wellmaker's last outing was a submission loss, and Tanzilovi has knockout power, though his debut showed little of it.
• Tanzilovi has only one UFC fight: Limited history makes any read on him less certain, and that lone fight was a shutout loss at the wrong weight on short notice.

Understanding the Prediction

The model lands on Wellmaker with a modest score of 16, and the breakdown shows why it is not a blowout read: - Odds drove the pick, adding 16 points as the single biggest factor. The betting market has Wellmaker at -225. - significant_striking_impact_differential added 4 points, reflecting Wellmaker's power edge. - recent_significant_striking_impact_differential added 2 points, backing his recent striking impact despite the losses. - trueskill, striking_impact_differential, and striking_defense_percentage each added 1 point. - recent_win_perc subtracted 2 points, and this is the caution flag. Wellmaker's recent record is 33%, reflecting those two straight losses. The model knows he is skidding.

Past Model Performance

Mixed history here. WolfTicketsAI nailed Wellmaker once, calling his Round 1 KO over Moutinho with an 0.81 score. But it also whiffed on his November 2025 fight, predicting Cody Haddon and getting it wrong when the bout went to a decision. So the model is 1-1 on Wellmaker, which fits the low-confidence 16 score here. There is no prediction history on Tanzilovi at all, so the read on him carries extra uncertainty given his single UFC appearance.

Conclusion

The model likes Wellmaker and so should you, but go in clear-eyed. Tanzilovi has a real path through the exact grappling hole that got Wellmaker submitted by Juan Diaz, and Wellmaker is riding a two-fight skid. That said, the stylistic math favors the heavier hands. Tanzilovi cannot handle pressure, gasses in Round 1, and does nothing with his takedowns. Wellmaker is a cage-cutting finisher who ends fights in 2:14 off a feint-hook built for men who retreat to the fence. WolfTicketsAI's pick is Malcolm Wellmaker, and the likeliest ending is another early right hook.

Analysis: Julius Walker vs Gerald Meerschaert

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Julius Walker to Win

Score: 19
Odds:
Julius Walker: -290
Gerald Meerschaert: +235

Julius Walker's Breakdown

Walker is a 6-foot-4 athlete out of Team Fusion in Springfield, Missouri, with a BJJ foundation built on a real wrestling base. His UFC record sits at 1-3, but do not let that number fool you about his tools. His best weapon is his wrestling and top control. Against Rafael Cerqueira in August 2025, he piled up six takedowns and nearly 12 minutes of control time across 15 minutes. That is the Walker blueprint: level change, pin, and grind.

His signature techniques:

• Chain wrestling to top control. The Cerqueira fight showed him stringing together double legs and body-lock trips, then riding top position for extended stretches. His stats back this up, with over 10 takedowns attempted per fight and 100 percent takedown defense across his career.
• Dynamic stance switching. Against Alonzo Menifield in his debut, Walker flipped between orthodox and southpaw to create angles for his power right hand. That performance went the distance and earned praise for its competitiveness.
• Explosive right hand. When he commits, he has pop. The problem is the form, which we get to below.

The technical evolution worry here is real. Walker's recent fights show him leaning more into striking exchanges, and that trend has gotten him hurt. His last two bouts ended in knockout losses.

Julius Walker's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Chin durability and opening-exchange defense. This is the glaring one. Against Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev in June 2026, Walker threw a naked low kick with no setup and ate a counter right hand over his lead shoulder. He was out cold in 8 seconds. That is a catastrophic hole, and Meerschaert owns 12 middleweight finishes.
• Backing straight to the fence when hurt. Against Dustin Jacoby in February 2026, Walker dominated the wrestling early, then got dropped by the right hand. He retreated straight to the cage with his eyes off Jacoby and got finished in Round 2. When hurt, Walker does not circle out. He freezes.
• Over-commitment on power shots. The Menifield fight showed him overextending on his right hand and falling off balance, leaving his head stationary on the centerline during resets. A patient counter grappler can time that.

When Walker's wrestling gameplan fails or he gets caught, he has shown he does not have a reliable panic button. He either freezes or backs into danger. That is the exact script that ended his last two fights.

Gerald Meerschaert's Breakdown

Meerschaert is a 37-fight savvy veteran and one of the best pure submission artists in middleweight history, holding the division record for most finishes with 12 and 29 career submission wins. His whole game is getting the fight to the mat and hunting the neck.

His signature techniques:

• Opportunistic back takes and chokes. Against Bryan Barberena in March 2024, he trapped the weighted hand along the fence and punched in a rear-naked choke for the finish. That is textbook GM3.
• Submission hunting from bad spots. Against Dustin Stoltzfus, he chained failed escapes into counters and finished off a scramble. He is dangerous even when he looks like he is losing.
• The unorthodox lean-back defense. Against Bruno Silva in 2022, his waist lean confused Silva into swinging and missing, then he landed a clinch-exit sneaker punch that rocked him.

But the recent picture is grim. Meerschaert has lost four straight: Reinier de Ridder, Brad Tavares, Michal Oleksiejczuk, Kyle Daukaus, and then Jacob Malkoun for a fifth. His recent win percentage is 0.00.

Gerald Meerschaert's Technical Vulnerabilities

• No head movement, chin in the air. Against Krzysztof Jotko, left hooks whizzed past his chin by half an inch with zero reaction. He does not see shots coming.
• Recent KO/sub losses pile up. Oleksiejczuk trapped his hand southpaw-vs-southpaw and dropped him in Round 1. Daukaus cracked him with a left hand 30 seconds in and D'Arce'd him at 50 seconds. He gets finished early now.
• Cannot force the grappling anymore. Against Tavares, his telegraphed single and double legs could not get the fight down. Against Daukaus and Oleksiejczuk, he never even got to initiate his grappling. The speed and athleticism have clearly declined at 37.

When Meerschaert's grappling entry fails, his fallback is a defensive, slow-paced striking shell that modern opponents punish. He has no bridge between phases anymore.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a clash between Walker's wrestling and Meerschaert's submission game, and that is where the caution flag flies. Walker loves to take people down and grind on top. But Meerschaert is at his most dangerous exactly there. Barberena, Giles, Stoltzfus, and Shahbazyan all found out that putting Meerschaert on his back or giving him scrambles is a trap. If Walker shoots carelessly or tries to pass into back-take range, he is handing GM3 the neck.

On the flip side, Walker's path mirrors the blueprint that has crushed Meerschaert five fights running. Keep it standing, pressure, and land the right hand. Oleksiejczuk, Daukaus, and Pyfer all showed that Meerschaert's chin-up, no-head-movement striking is there to be taken. Walker's explosive right hand and reach advantage (78 inches vs 77) fit that mold, provided Walker does not throw naked strikes like he did against Yakhyaev.

The key question is which fighter's flaw shows up first. Walker's chin is fragile but Meerschaert no longer has the pop to exploit it the way Yakhyaev or Jacoby did. Meerschaert's ground game is lethal but he cannot get fights there anymore.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: This is Meerschaert's most dangerous window. Daukaus and Oleksiejczuk both got him out in Round 1, but those were explosive strikers. If Walker rushes a sloppy takedown, Meerschaert can snatch a guillotine or D'Arce on the entry, just like he did to so many aggressive grapplers. Walker needs disciplined level changes, not wild ones.
• Mid-fight: If Walker establishes top control safely and avoids the neck, his volume and ground-and-pound take over. Meerschaert's recent inability to create scrambles against fresher athletes suggests Walker can grind rounds the way he did against Cerqueira.
• Later rounds: Walker showed real cardio going 15 minutes with Menifield and Cerqueira. Meerschaert at 37 fading into his defensive shell favors Walker late if the fight stays competitive and Walker keeps his chin tucked.

Analysis and Key Points

• Walker's wrestling must stay disciplined. Reckless shots feed Meerschaert's guillotine and D'Arce game, the same finishes that ended Giles and tagged countless aggressive grapplers.
• Walker's chin is the red flag. Back-to-back KO losses to Yakhyaev (8 seconds) and Jacoby mean a clean shot ends his night. Warning: he was recently knocked out, and it can happen again.
• Meerschaert is on a brutal skid. Five straight losses, 0.00 recent win rate, told to retire by fans after the Daukaus sub. The athleticism gap against younger fighters is now obvious.
• The striking edge tilts to Walker. Meerschaert's chin-up, no-head-movement defense got exposed by Jotko, Pyfer, Oleksiejczuk, and Daukaus. Walker's right hand and reach can find it.
• Avoid the neck. If Walker controls on top without over-pursuing, he wins the grind. If he dives for a sub or gets sloppy, GM3 can still catch anyone.

Understanding the Prediction

The model lands on Walker with a modest score of 19, and the SHAP data tells you why it is confident but not blown out:

• Odds were the dominant factor, adding 16 points. The market has Walker a clear -290 favorite.
• significant_striking_impact_differential, trueskill, and recent_takedowns_attempted_per_fight each added 2 points, reflecting Walker's heavy takedown volume and the broader skill picture.
• recent_significant_striking_impact_differential, recent_win_perc, striking_impact_differential, significant_striking_output_differential, and reach each nudged the score up by 1.
• On the other side, recent_striking_impact_differential and recent_average_striking_output_differential each pulled the score down by 1, a nod to Walker's ugly recent KO losses dragging on his recent numbers.

The push and pull of those recent-form features is why the final score sits at a cautious 19 rather than a runaway number.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has been sharp on both men. On Walker, the model is 3-for-3, correctly calling the Yakhyaev KO, the Jacoby KO, and the Cerqueira decision win. That is a perfect record and a real vote of confidence when the model backs Walker.

On Meerschaert, the model has been right in 8 of his last 10 tracked fights, including every recent loss in his skid. The two misses were when it picked against him and he pulled off subs over Bruno Silva and Shahbazyan. That is the lurking risk here: when the model doubts Meerschaert, his submission magic has occasionally spoiled the pick. Keep that in mind, because GM3's neck game never fully disappears.

Conclusion

Walker is the live favorite for good reason. His wrestling, reach, and the exact striking profile that has finished Meerschaert five times running point to a Walker win, and the model's perfect 3-for-3 record on him adds weight. The path is clear: pressure, land the right hand, and control on top without feeding the neck. The only way this flips is if Walker's suspect chin gets cracked or he dives into one of GM3's trademark chokes. Play it smart, and WolfTicketsAI's pick of Julius Walker holds.

Analysis: Francisco Prado vs Ismael Bonfim

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Francisco Prado to Win

Score: 8
Odds:
Francisco Prado: -110
Ismael Bonfim: -110

Francisco Prado's Breakdown

Prado is the young Argentine brawler who came into the UFC with a reputation for violence and first-round finishes. His best night in the Octagon came against Ottman Azaitar in July 2023, and it is the blueprint for how he wins this fight. Against Azaitar, Prado read his opponent's favorite left hook to the body and timed a right elbow every time Azaitar dropped his guard to dig downstairs. That sequence built into a spinning back elbow that hurt Azaitar and set up the TKO. That fight shows what Prado does best: pressure, close-range elbows, and punishing predictable patterns.

His signature techniques:

• Counter elbows in the pocket. The Azaitar finish is the clearest example. When he can read an opponent's rhythm, he steps in with elbows that land clean in tight spaces.
• Lead calf kick into overhand right. Against Jake Matthews he leaned on leg kicks early and tried to chain them into his power right hand. The kicks landed, but the combinations behind them fizzled.
• Opportunistic grappling. Against Nikolay Veretennikov in July 2025, his first-round grappling looked, in the words of one analyst, "slick as hell." He can get the fight down and work when the sequence opens up.

Technical evolution has been a mixed bag. He flashed a southpaw look against Daniel Zellhuber to vary his jab and distance, which showed growing fight IQ. But across his recent run he has struggled to put it all together for 15 minutes.

Here is the warning you cannot ignore. Prado has lost four of his last five, dropping decisions to Zellhuber, Matthews, Veretennikov, and Charles Radtke. His last win was Azaitar in 2023. His recent win percentage sits at zero. That is a real downward trend, and WolfTicketsAI is leaning on the odds and TrueSkill rather than recent form to make this pick.

Francisco Prado's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Head position on entries. Against Matthews, Prado led with his head when firing the right hand, and Matthews punished him all night with the straight down the middle and a ramrod jab. Bonfim is a sharp counter puncher who can do the same thing.
• Cardio fade. The Mullarkey fight (February 2023) is the textbook case. Prado started strong, then visibly tired by round three as Mullarkey turned up the volume and cruised. The Zellhuber clinch wore him down too. If this fight gets to the later rounds, Prado historically slows.
• Spinning attacks that give up the back. Against Veretennikov he "kept giving up his back by doing crap spinning kicks." Bonfim is a finisher who pounces on openings, and a blown spinning attack is exactly the kind of mistake he feasts on.

When his gameplan fails, Prado defaults to shelling up against the fence or circling out with his guard dropping, which Matthews exploited repeatedly. Under pressure he does not reset well.

Ismael Bonfim's Breakdown

Bonfim, "Marreta," is the more technically refined striker on paper. At his peak he was 14-1 over a 15-fight stretch and announced himself in the UFC with a highlight flying-knee KO of Terrance McKinney in January 2023. Against McKinney he baited the reckless flying knees, worked the body along the fence, then landed his own flying knee in round two for the finish. That is Bonfim at his best: composed, body-focused, countering an aggressive opponent.

His signature techniques:

• Multi-level striking and body work. Against Vinc Pichel (May 2024) he landed 244 significant strikes, managing range with the jab and digging to the body to control pace over three rounds.
• Counter right hand. Against Chris Padilla he timed heavy counter rights on Padilla's entries early. The power is real even when he is not at his best.
• Flying knee and spinning attacks. The McKinney KO is the signature, and he mixes spinning elbows and knees into his offense.

Here is where it gets ugly. Bonfim is on a three-fight losing streak, all stoppages. Nazim Sadykhov finished him with a question mark kick to the eye (February 2025). Padilla wore him down and TKO'd him in round two after Bonfim missed weight by five pounds (November 2025). Axel Sola submitted him via D'Arce choke in round one (July 2026). His recent win percentage is zero.

Ismael Bonfim's Technical Vulnerabilities

• KO/TKO warning. Bonfim has been stopped in three straight fights, including a KO/TKO by Padilla and a doctor's stoppage from Sadykhov's head kick. A fighter taking this much recent damage is a live candidate to get stopped again. Prado has one-shot power and the elbows to end it.
• Overreaction to body attacks. The Sadykhov finish exposed a deep flaw. Bonfim dove forward with both hands dropping to defend a body kick that redirected into a question mark kick to his eye. He abandons head defense to protect the body. Prado works level changes and kicks that could draw this out.
• Submission defense when hurt. Benoit Saint Denis (July 2023) and Axel Sola both choked him out once the grappling started. When stunned, Bonfim panic-scrambles and exposes his neck. Prado has six career submission wins and slick scramble grappling, which is a genuine threat here.
• Confidence fragility. Analysts have noted Bonfim needs to "admire his work" to stay in rhythm. Disrupt his tempo and his output collapses, as it did against Padilla.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a clash between the sharper technician who is physically and mentally compromised, and the heavier-handed brawler who cannot buy a win.

Prado's best path is clear. His counter elbows, the exact weapon that ended Azaitar, match up well against a Bonfim who drops his hands to defend the body. If Prado shows a kick or body feint, Bonfim's documented overreaction could open the head. And if Prado can threaten the clinch or hit a scramble, Bonfim's submission defense has failed three times now, though Prado must avoid being the one caught, as Bonfim is the better finisher when fresh.

Bonfim's path is to do what Matthews did: stay disciplined, use the jab, control range, and counter Prado's head-first entries with the straight right. If Bonfim fights like he did against Pichel, picking shots and managing distance, he boxes up Prado and wins rounds. The problem is whether the current version of Bonfim can still do that after three straight stoppages.

The McKinney fight is the cautionary tale for Prado. Bonfim eats wild aggression for breakfast and counters it. But the Sadykhov and Sola fights show a man whose defensive integrity has cracked.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: Bonfim is the more dangerous fighter in the first five minutes if his confidence holds. He countered McKinney and Padilla well early. Prado's power is also most live here, and Bonfim has been stopped early twice recently. This is the highest-variance phase.
• Mid-fight: If Prado survives early and lands his elbows or draws out a bad Bonfim reaction, this is where his pressure pays. Against Azaitar the finish came from reading patterns and stepping in.
• Late rounds: Prado fades, as Mullarkey and Zellhuber both showed. But Bonfim's own cardio collapsed against Padilla. Whoever is fresher wins a scrappy third. Neither man has been reliable here recently.

Analysis and Key Points

• Both fighters enter on brutal skids. Prado has lost four of five, Bonfim three straight by stoppage. This is a fight between two men who need a win badly.
• Prado's counter elbows vs Bonfim's dropped hands. The Azaitar finish is the template, and Bonfim's body-defense flaw from the Sadykhov loss is the opening.
• Bonfim's KO/TKO risk is real. Three straight stoppages. Prado's power and elbows could add a fourth.
• Prado's cardio is the recurring crack. If Bonfim boxes smart like he did against Pichel, he can drag Prado into deep water where Prado wilts.
• Submission threat cuts toward Prado. Bonfim has been choked out twice when hurt. Prado's scramble grappling and submission history matter.

Understanding the Prediction

The model's confidence here is driven almost entirely by a few features:

• Odds moved the score up by 6.0. This is a pick'em at -110 both ways, and the model reads that market signal heavily toward Prado.
• TrueSkill added 3.0, which is notable because Bonfim actually carries the higher TrueSkill mu (32.3 vs 20.8). The feature nonetheless pushed toward Prado in the model's calculation.
• recent_win_perc added 3.0. Both men sit at zero recent win percentage, which flattens Bonfim's edge.
• significant_striking_impact_differential and recent_striking_impact_differential each added 1.0.
• recent_significant_striking_impact_differential subtracted 1.0, the lone feature pulling back toward Bonfim, reflecting his sharper recent output when he is landing.

Everything else registered no meaningful impact.

Past Model Performance

This is where you should temper confidence. WolfTicketsAI has a rough history with both men. On Prado, the model has picked him correctly only once (the Azaitar KO) and whiffed when backing him against Veretennikov. On Bonfim, the record is worse: the model picked Bonfim to win in his last four and was wrong in three of them, including the Saint Denis, Sadykhov, Padilla, and Sola fights. The model has repeatedly overrated Bonfim. The silver lining for this pick is that the model is now on the other side of Bonfim, which breaks that losing pattern.

Conclusion

Two fighters in free fall collide, but WolfTicketsAI sides with Francisco Prado. Bonfim has been stopped three straight times, his submission defense folds when hurt, and his body-defense flaw plays into Prado's elbows and level changes. Prado's power and finishing instinct are the kind that ends a fighter already carrying this much damage. The clear risk is Prado's cardio and his head-first entries, but on balance, back Prado to hand Bonfim a fourth straight stoppage loss or grind out the win.

Analysis: Niko Price vs Leon Shahbazyan

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Leon Shahbazyan to Win

Score: 2
Odds:
Niko Price: +130
Leon Shahbazyan: -155

Niko Price's Breakdown

Niko "The Hybrid" Price is one of the most entertaining welterweights of his era, but the version showing up for this fight is a shell of the man who upkicked James Vick into another dimension in 2019. Price built his name on chaos. His signature weapons are unorthodox and dangerous when he is allowed to work.

Signature techniques: - Finishes from the bottom. Price is the only fighter to record multiple UFC knockouts from his back. Against Randy Brown at UFC Fight Night 133 (Round 2), he trapped Brown's head with his left foot against the fence and hammerfisted him unconscious. Against James Vick (Round 1), he timed a perfect upkick as Vick postured up. If this fight hits the mat with Price on bottom, he is never truly out of it. - Counter right hand. Price dropped Alan Jouban (2017, Round 1) with a counter straight as Jouban threw a naked low kick. He did the same to Tim Means (2019, Round 1), eating punishment for four minutes before landing a fight-ending counter right hook. His power is real and lives late in rounds. - Volume pressure boxing. Against Donald Cerrone (2020), Price landed 40 strikes in under half a round, backing Cowboy to the fence with uppercuts and elbows at close range.

Technical evolution: There has been none in the right direction. The recent trend is decline. Price has gone 1-6 in his last seven, and the wheels have come off completely. His once-granite chin is gone.

Niko Price's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Shattered chin and defensive striking. This is the big one. Price was starched by Nikolay Veretennikov in just 1:42 (February 2026), left standing but unconscious after a right hand, knee, and elbow sequence against the fence. Before that, Phil Rowe (2022, Round 3) and Robbie Lawler (2023, Round 1) both knocked him out. Three KO losses in his last several fights is a flashing red warning. A fighter whose chin is this compromised should not be sharing a cage with a rangy power striker.
• Takedown defense and wrestling. Themba Gorimbo (2024) took him down seven times across three rounds and piled up 9:14 of control. Price landed just 16 significant strikes the entire fight. His 50 percent career takedown defense is a chronic hole.
• Gets backed to the fence and smothered. Against both Veretennikov and Gorimbo, Price could not maintain center octagon and was trapped against the cage early, where he has no answers anymore.

Leon Shahbazyan's Breakdown

Leon Shahbazyan is the older brother of Edmen Shahbazyan and a tall, rangy welterweight at 6'4" with a 77-inch reach. His resume outside the UFC is built almost entirely on submissions. He has 11 of 12 wins by submission with six guillotine chokes, finishing his last four regional opponents by first-round sub.

Signature techniques: - Guillotine choke and submission chains. This is his bread and butter. He is a finisher who closes distance, clinches, and attacks the neck. Against a fighter like Price who will willingly scramble and give up his neck in chaotic exchanges, this is a live threat. - Length and frame. His reach and height let him smother smaller welterweights and work from top position or in the clinch toward submissions.

Technical evolution: Impossible to measure meaningfully. His lone UFC appearance was a disaster. Levan Chokheli vaporized him in 23 seconds (June 2026) with a calf kick and an eight-punch barrage before Shahbazyan could do anything.

Leon Shahbazyan's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Catastrophic striking defense and leg kick vulnerability. All five of Shahbazyan's career losses are by KO/TKO. In his UFC debut, a single calf kick compromised him instantly, and he turtled against the fence rather than fighting back. This is a fighter who folds under early striking pressure.
• Pressure response. When Chokheli came forward, Shahbazyan had no counter, no clinch entry, and no exit. He simply covered up and got finished.
• Unproven at this level with massive uncertainty. He has exactly one UFC fight, and it lasted 23 seconds. With fewer than two meaningful UFC fights, this prediction carries elevated uncertainty. His TrueSkill Sigma of 8.33 reflects how little the model actually knows about him.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a fight between two badly damaged or badly unproven fighters, and it comes down to which flaw gets exposed first.

• What Shahbazyan can exploit: Price's gone chin and his willingness to be hittable. If Shahbazyan lands clean early, the way Veretennikov and Lawler did, Price is in serious danger. Shahbazyan's length also lets him attack the guillotine when Price shoots sloppy takedowns, exactly the kind he attempted against Michael Chiesa before getting submitted in 63 seconds.
• What Price can exploit: Shahbazyan's own glass chin and his panic under pressure. Price's best path is his counter right hand and early volume. If Price does to Shahbazyan what he did to Jouban and Means, he can get a finish. The Veretennikov blueprint works both ways, and Price still hits hard.
• Historical parallel: Shahbazyan's 23-second collapse mirrors how Price himself gets finished when pressured to the fence. Two fighters who both crumble under early aggression is a coin flip with a short fuse.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: The most dangerous phase for both. Whoever lands first likely wins. Price has the counter power (Jouban, Means) and Shahbazyan has shown he cannot absorb early offense at all. But Price's own chin means one clean Shahbazyan shot could end it too.
• Mid-fight: If it survives the opening exchanges, Shahbazyan's length and submission game become factors in the clinch and on the mat. Price's scramble-heavy bottom game (Brown, Vick) remains a live counter-threat even from bad spots.
• Later rounds: Price's cardio has faded badly in recent fights, and Shahbazyan is a total unknown past round one. Neither man profiles as a strong late-round fighter.

Analysis and Key Points

• Price has been KO'd three times recently. Per heuristic, the same can absolutely happen again against a power striker. This is the single biggest factor working against him.
• Shahbazyan has fewer than two UFC fights, and the one he had lasted 23 seconds. The prediction is less certain because of it.
• Both fighters have been finished by strikes repeatedly. Price's recent KO losses to Veretennikov and Lawler; Shahbazyan's five career losses all by TKO/KO.
• Price is on a brutal 1-6 slide over his last seven, a clear downward trend per heuristic.
• Shahbazyan's guillotine threat matches dangerously against Price's habit of shooting ill-advised takedowns, as seen in the Chiesa submission loss.

Understanding the Prediction

The model lands on Shahbazyan with a modest score of 2, and the SHAP features explain the tug of war:

• recent_takedowns_attempted_per_fight increased the score by 5.0, the biggest single driver toward Shahbazyan.
• odds decreased the score by 3.0, reflecting that Shahbazyan is already the betting favorite at -155.
• recent_win_perc decreased the score by 2.0, a point in Price's favor given Shahbazyan's recent loss.
• trueskill decreased by 1.0, acknowledging Price's higher and more established rating.
• Several striking features nudged the score up by 1.0 each: recent_significant_striking_impact_differential, striking_impact_differential, reach, recent_significant_striking_output_differential, and striking_defense_percentage.
• recent_significant_striking_defense_percentage decreased the score by 1.0.

The net is a slim lean toward Shahbazyan, driven heavily by takedown and reach factors but tempered by Price's established TrueSkill and the odds.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has a strong track record picking against Price. It correctly called his losses to Michael Chiesa (0.80), Jacobe Smith (0.67), Themba Gorimbo (0.63), and Phil Rowe (0.33). It was wrong twice: picking Price to beat Robbie Lawler (he got KO'd) and picking Alex Morono over Price (Price won). The pattern is clear. When the model picks against Price, it has mostly been right, which lends confidence to this Shahbazyan lean. There is no prediction history on Shahbazyan, which adds uncertainty to his side of the equation.

Conclusion

This is a low-confidence pick in a fight between two compromised men. WolfTicketsAI sides with Leon Shahbazyan, leaning on his length, submission threat, and takedown activity, plus a strong recent record of correctly calling Price's downfall. But understand the risk: both fighters fold under early pressure, and Price still carries counter power. Expect an early finish either way, with the edge going to Shahbazyan.

Analysis: Felipe Franco vs Brendson Ribeiro

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Felipe Franco to Win

Score: 18
Odds:
Felipe Franco: -370
Brendson Ribeiro: +290

Felipe Franco's Breakdown

Franco is a grappling-first light heavyweight out of Galpão da Luta in Salvador, the same gym that produced Jailton Almeida. He holds a BJJ black belt and a judo brown belt, and his fighting DNA matches that resume. Ten of his eleven career wins came in round one, and he has never once seen a judge's scorecard in a victory. Every single win is a finish, split between seven KO/TKOs and four submissions. That is the profile of a wrecker, and against Ribeiro it may be exactly what the matchup calls for.

His signature sequences revolve around hurting you, then dragging you down:

• Strike-to-takedown chaining. Against Levi Rodrigues Jr. in July 2026, Franco opened round 2 with a stiff jab that visibly buzzed Rodrigues. Rather than chase the knockout against a faster striker, he immediately shot a double leg, moved straight to mount, and finished. That is textbook fight IQ: use the strike to freeze the opponent, then change levels while they recover.
• Mount advancement and elbow ground-and-pound. In round 1 of that same fight, Franco climbed to full mount with 30 seconds left and dropped blistering elbows. He posts heavy, kills the hip escape, and postures up to unload. This is his bread and butter and it earned him a $100,000 Performance of the Night bonus.
• Flying knee as a scramble reset. When Rodrigues clubbed him with a left hand and swarmed, Franco answered with a flying knee to disrupt forward momentum, then transitioned to a takedown. It is how he buys time when he's hurt and shifts the fight back to his world.

When his primary plan stalls, Franco leans on durability and wrestling grit. In his heavyweight debut against Mario Pinto he stuffed 12 of 14 takedowns and muscled back to his feet repeatedly, winning a round on all three cards despite giving up roughly 60 pounds. His technical evolution is simple: dropping from a short-notice heavyweight bout back to his natural 205 let his finishing instincts breathe again.

Felipe Franco's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Early striking defense and hand speed. Franco got badly hurt in round 1 against Rodrigues, eating a massive clubbing left that sent him retreating. He admitted on film he could not win pure boxing exchanges against the faster man and needed grappling to survive. His recent significant striking defense sits around 28 percent, which is alarming. Ribeiro is a rangy, orthodox power puncher who starts fast, exactly the kind of early threat that has rocked Franco before.
• Reliance on hurting opponents to set up takedowns. Franco's best shots came after he'd already stunned his man. Against Pinto, with a healthy opponent who refused to trade recklessly, Franco landed only 21 significant strikes in 15 minutes and could not create entries. If Ribeiro stays disciplined early and does not get clipped, Franco's offense can go quiet.
• Ring generalship against patient fighters. Pinto "led the dance" and Franco could not cut the cage or dictate range. A measured opponent who keeps distance can neutralize his pressure.

Brendson Ribeiro's Breakdown

Ribeiro is "The Gorilla," a 6'3" orthodox striker with an 81-inch reach and a deep but checkered 17-11-1 record. He brings real power and some genuinely slick submissions, but he arrives on a brutal four-fight skid, all losses, with a recent win percentage of zero. That is the elephant in the cage.

His weapons, when they work:

• Counter power punching. Against Magomed Tuchalov in July 2026, Ribeiro won round 1 outright on all three cards, landing a counter that opened a cut under Tuchalov's eye in the final 20 seconds. He also out-landed Tuchalov in total significant strikes across the fight.
• High kicks and range striking. He landed a clean high kick flush on the chin of Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev. His length lets him pepper jabs and straights when he can keep the fight at distance.
• Kimura from bottom half guard. This is his most dangerous surprise. He submitted Diyar Nurgozhay with a kimura off his back from half guard against the cage, and he threatened the same grip against Oumar Sy. Any opponent who gets careless in top control can get caught.

Brendson Ribeiro's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Takedown defense is a sieve. Ribeiro's career takedown defense hovers around 32 percent, and against Tuchalov he ate 8 takedowns to 0 and got ragdolled in round 3. Against Yakhyaev he was taken down after landing his own high kick and submitted at 2:52 of round 1. This is the single biggest hole in his game and it lines up perfectly with Franco's entire skill set.
• Cardio collapse after round 1. This is a recurring pattern. He won round 1 against Tuchalov then visibly gassed and got dominated in rounds 2 and 3. If he does not finish early, his output and defense crater.
• Durability and chin under pressure. Ribeiro has been KO'd multiple times, including by Zhang Mingyang (trapped against the fence, walked through a 1-2 and ate a 2-3 counter) and Azamat Murzakanov (dropped by a clean left hand then finished with ground-and-pound). His straight-line retreats to the cage leave him a sitting target. Warning: Ribeiro has been finished by strikes in three of his last four, so another KO/TKO loss is a live possibility here.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a grappler-versus-striker clash where the grappler's bread and butter attacks the striker's worst flaw.

• Franco's double leg and mount-based ground-and-pound exploit Ribeiro's 32 percent takedown defense directly. The blueprint already exists: Tuchalov out-wrestled Ribeiro for 8 takedowns, and Yakhyaev took him down and submitted him in under three minutes. Franco finishes from mount better than either of those men.
• Ribeiro's counter right hand and high kick are his path to trouble for Franco. Franco's early striking defense is genuinely bad, and he got rocked by Rodrigues' left hand. If Ribeiro lands a clean counter in the first two minutes, he has the power to end it. That is the one road to an upset.
• The kimura trap is the dark horse. Franco likes to pass straight to mount. If he gets sloppy posturing up, Ribeiro's bottom-half-guard kimura, the exact finish he hit on Nurgozhay, is a real threat. Franco's grappling pedigree and teammate Almeida's influence should keep him tidy, but it is worth respecting.

The historical lesson writes itself: the Yakhyaev fight is the template. Ribeiro landed his flashy strike, got taken down anyway, and tapped. Franco is that same takedown threat with even nastier top-side finishing.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: This is Ribeiro's window. He starts fast, as he showed against Tuchalov and in the opening exchanges with Rodrigues' conqueror types. Expect him to look for the counter right and high kick while Franco weathers the storm. Franco's own round 1 against Rodrigues shows he can get hurt early but survive and turn it around.
• Mid-fight adjustments: Once Franco changes levels and gets Ribeiro's back on the mat, the complexion shifts hard. Ribeiro has no answer for sustained top pressure, and his cardio is already a question mark after one hard round. Franco's mount-to-elbows sequence is the likely finishing picture.
• Later rounds: If this somehow goes long, it only gets worse for Ribeiro. He has faded in every recent fight that left round 1, while Franco showed he can grind 15 minutes against a heavyweight. Cardio and grappling both point the same direction.

Analysis and Key Points

• Franco's double leg vs Ribeiro's 32% takedown defense is the defining mismatch. Tuchalov and Yakhyaev both drilled this hole; Franco finishes harder than both.
• Ribeiro's only real path is an early counter right hand or high kick, the shots that hurt Franco-level chins. His power against Franco's shaky early striking defense is the upset scenario.
• Warning on Ribeiro's skid: four straight losses, zero recent win percentage, and KO/TKO defeats in three of the last four. The downward trend is steep and real.
• Watch the kimura. Ribeiro's Nurgozhay finish proves he can punish a sloppy top player off his back.
• Cardio is a one-way street. Ribeiro gasses after round 1; Franco survived 15 minutes at heavyweight.

Understanding the Prediction

The model's confidence here is modest at 18, and the SHAP data explains why it is not higher:

• Odds were the dominant factor, pushing the score up by 20. The market has Franco a clear -370 favorite and the model respects it.
• Significant striking impact differential and recent significant striking impact differential each nudged the score up by 2, reflecting Franco's finishing power when he connects.
• Recent win percentage (+1) and recent significant striking defense percentage (+1) added small bumps in Franco's favor.
• On the other side, reach cut the score by 3, since Ribeiro owns a 5-inch reach edge (81 vs 76), and striking defense percentage cut another 3, a nod to Franco's genuinely leaky early defense.

So the model landed on a confident but not blowout pick: Franco's power and the betting line carry it, while Ribeiro's reach and Franco's defensive gaps keep the number grounded.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has no prediction history on Felipe Franco, so there is some built-in uncertainty on how the model reads his profile. On Ribeiro, though, the model has been sharp. It correctly called his losses to Yakhyaev (0.83), Oumar Sy (0.78), and Azamat Murzakanov (0.79), all first-round finishes. Its one miss on Ribeiro was predicting against him versus Caio Machado, a fight Ribeiro won by split decision. The pattern is clear: when the model picks against Ribeiro in a finish-threat spot, it has been right every time. That is a meaningful vote of confidence in this exact kind of pick.

Conclusion

The styles could not line up more cleanly for WolfTicketsAI's pick. Franco is a finisher who hunts takedowns and buries opponents under mount elbows, and Ribeiro's career-long takedown defense, cardio collapse, and recent run of first-round losses make him the ideal victim for that game. Ribeiro has the power to steal it early if Franco's shaky defense lets him in, but the math, the film, and the model all point one way. Take Felipe Franco to drag this to the mat and finish it.

Analysis: Allen Frye Jr. vs RJ Harris

WolfTicketsAI Predicts RJ Harris to Win

Score: 18
Odds:
Allen Frye Jr.: +250
RJ Harris: -310

Allen Frye Jr.'s Breakdown

Frye came into the UFC as a pure finisher. Six pro fights, six knockouts, never a judge required. Then the matchmakers threw him in against the long, rangy Guilherme Pat in December 2025, and the whole thing fell apart. Frye got swept 30-27 across all three cards and, for the first time in his career, had to find out what round three feels like.

His signature tools, such as they are, revolve around close-range work:

• Clinch striking against the fence. Frye's best offense versus Pat came in tight. He landed 14 of 17 significant strikes in the clinch at 82% accuracy. When he could press an opponent to the cage, he found a home for short shots.
• Body work on the inside. He went a perfect 12 of 12 on body shots against Pat. The timing and placement were clean. The problem was volume, not accuracy.
• Cage control. He piled up 7:55 of control time over 15 minutes, climbing each round (2:18, 2:15, 3:22). But he never converted it. No takedowns, no ground strikes, no submissions. Control that scores nothing.

The honest read on Frye's evolution is that he hasn't shown one yet at this level. His regional game was built on landing one big shot early. When that path was closed against Pat, he had no plan B beyond leaning on the fence and stalling.

Allen Frye Jr.'s Technical Vulnerabilities

• Can't solve length at range. Against Pat, Frye landed just 19 of 69 distance strikes (28%) and a woeful 17 of 65 to the head (26%). He got outlanded 54-19 at range. Harris is 6'6" and will be the longer, rangier man here, just like Pat was. This is the exact profile that neutralized Frye.
• Cardio collapse in deep water. In Round 3 versus Pat, Frye's output cratered to 4 of 12 (33%) while Pat poured it on at 27 of 35 (77%). His first fight past two rounds exposed a gas tank problem. If he can't finish early, he fades.
• No answer when the KO doesn't come. When his power game stalls, Frye defaults to passive fence-leaning with no follow-up. That tendency got him swept on every card. Against a counter puncher like Harris, pressing forward recklessly to force a finish is dangerous.

Warning: Frye has lost his most recent fight and it was his only UFC appearance. His one-dimensional power game has already been solved once by a longer opponent, and Harris fits that mold.

RJ Harris's Breakdown

Harris made his debut on one week's notice in July 2026, stepping in for, of all people, Allen Frye Jr. He needed just 1:40 to dispatch Alvin Hines by TKO. For a short-notice heavyweight who still works full-time as a union lineman, it was a clean, violent statement.

His core strengths:

• Counter uppercut. The finish against Hines was textbook. Hines lunged with a lead overhand right, Harris slipped it clean and fired a right uppercut from the hip that flush caught the jaw and lifted Hines off his feet. This is a fighter who waits for the overcommit and punishes it.
• Pattern reading off leg kicks. Early in that fight Hines was pumping low kicks. Harris stayed patient, calculated the rhythm, then timed a leg kick with a right hand counter. He reads tendencies and exploits them rather than forcing the issue.
• Finishing instinct and ground follow-up. The second Hines dropped, Harris pounced with ground-and-pound and closed the show. His wrestling base from high school shows up in how comfortable he is following a hurt man to the mat.

Technically, Harris is raw but efficient. His left hook in tight helped him find rhythm after a slow first minute. At 6'6" with a 78" reach and legitimate one-shot power, he brings exactly the physical profile that gives Frye nightmares.

RJ Harris's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Slow, tentative starts. Harris looked hesitant for the first minute against Hines, eating leg kicks before he found his range. A faster starter could bank early damage. Frye, however, is not a quick starter and lands at only 38% himself, so this gap is unlikely to get punished here.
• Leg kick defense. Hines landed multiple low kicks early before Harris adjusted. His recent leg kicks absorbed sits high. Frye does throw some leg kicks (0.27 landed per minute) but it's not a real part of his arsenal, so the threat is minimal.
• Thin resume. Harris has limited pro experience and one UFC fight that lasted under two minutes. We haven't seen him tested in deep water or against a measured technician. That's a real uncertainty, but Frye isn't the technician to expose it.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a classic case of the longer counter puncher versus the shorter power hunter who has already proven he can't deal with length.

What Harris does to Frye: Frye has to close distance to be effective, and closing distance is exactly where Harris is deadly. The Hines finish is the blueprint. When an opponent lunges in to get inside, Harris slips and fires the uppercut. Frye's path to victory requires forward pressure and reckless entries, the very behavior that Harris turned into a highlight reel. Pat already showed that Frye can be outlanded 54-19 at range by a tall heavyweight. Harris has more pop than Pat and a cleaner counter game.

What Frye does to Harris: His one real shot is dragging Harris to the fence and grinding. He had 7:55 of control against Pat. If he can smother Harris and avoid the open-space counters, he could steal rounds. But he's never shown he can score or damage from control, and Harris has a wrestling base to defend the clinch. Frye also has zero takedown attempts in the UFC, so the "grind" is just leaning, which judges already ignored once.

The historical lesson is right there in Frye's own record. Pat picked him apart with length and patience. Harris is a longer, harder-hitting, more dangerous version of that same archetype.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: This is where it likely ends. Frye will press forward to find his power. Harris sits back, reads the entry, and counters. The first clean lunge from Frye is the danger moment, exactly how Hines got dropped at 1:40.
• Mid-fight adjustments: If Frye survives the opening exchanges, he'll try to drag it to the fence and stall like he did against Pat. Harris must stay disciplined and avoid being smothered. But Frye's inability to damage from control means even a grind-heavy middle round may not score.
• Late rounds: This favors nobody for Frye. His Round 3 against Pat was a collapse, 4 of 12 striking. If this somehow reaches the third, a fading Frye walking onto Harris's counters is a recipe for a late stoppage, not a comeback.

Analysis and Key Points

• Harris's counter uppercut vs Frye's reckless entries is the defining clash. Frye must come forward to win, and that's exactly the trigger Harris finished Hines with.
• Length beats Frye again. Pat outlanded him 54-19 at distance. Harris has the same reach advantage plus real knockout power.
• Frye's control time is empty calories. 7:55 against Pat produced zero takedowns, zero ground strikes, and a sweep on the cards.
• Cardio is a Frye liability. His only three-round fight ended with his output collapsing. Harris doesn't need deep water, but it's one more edge.
• Warning on Frye: coming off a one-sided loss, with a one-dimensional game already solved by a tall rangy opponent.
• Caution on Harris: very thin sample size and a slow starter, but his flaws don't line up with Frye's limited tools.

Understanding the Prediction

The model lands on Harris with a modest score of 18, and the SHAP data tells you why it's confident but not overwhelming:

• Odds moved the score down by 12, the single biggest factor, reflecting that Harris is already a heavy -310 favorite.
• significant_striking_impact_differential dropped it another 2, and recent_significant_striking_impact_differential and recent_win_perc each shaved off 1.
• On the other side, striking_impact_differential, average_striking_output_differential, and reach each added 1 to the score, with Harris's length and cleaner impact numbers helping his case.
• striking_defense_percentage cost 1 while recent_significant_striking_defense_percentage added 1 back.

The net is a measured lean toward Harris, driven mostly by the market and his superior striking impact and reach.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has no prior prediction history on either Allen Frye Jr. or RJ Harris. Both are fresh to the system with a single UFC fight apiece. That means there's no track record to lean on for confidence or to flag as a caution. Weigh the thin sample size accordingly, but note the stylistic logic behind this pick is strong regardless.

Conclusion

Frye is a one-shot power puncher who has already been shown the exit by a tall, rangy heavyweight, and Harris is a harder-hitting, better-countering version of that exact problem. Every entry Frye needs to make is the entry Harris lives to counter. WolfTicketsAI backs RJ Harris, and the smart read is a first-round counter that ends Frye's night early.

Analysis: Alice Pereira vs Daria Zhelezniakova

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Alice Pereira to Win

Score: 6
Odds:
Alice Pereira: -150
Daria Zhelezniakova: +125

Alice Pereira's Breakdown

Pereira is a 20-year-old Sanda-based knockout artist with a 7-1 record and an 86% finish rate. You saw her ceiling on full display at UFC Vegas 115 against Hailey Cowan, where she walked away with Performance of the Night for one of the nastiest knees of 2026.

Her signature weapons:

• The step-in/jumping knee up the middle. This is her finisher and her calling card. Against Cowan in Round 2, after eating over three minutes of ground control, Pereira scrambled back to her feet and timed Cowan's forward re-engagement perfectly. The knee landed flush on the chin and put Cowan out cold at 4:24. She reads forward pressure and punishes it up the center, which is exactly the kind of pattern Zhelezniakova's movement-and-return style can walk into.
• Clinch separation with superman punches and step-in knees. In Round 1 against Cowan, when Cowan pressed her to the fence and hunted takedowns, Pereira fired superman punches and knees to create space and break grips. She turns clinch defense into offense.
• Long-range leg kicks and looping power hands. She opened the Cowan fight with leg kicks to damage the base, then layered in looping power shots that cut and bruised Cowan's face in Round 1. At 5'8" with a 71-inch reach, she fights tall and hits hard.

Her technical evolution is real. The Cowan win was a direct correction of her debut loss to Montse Rendon, where she "mainly circled away" and lacked activity. Against Cowan she engaged from the opening bell and showed improved takedown defense, shrugging off multiple clinch entries in Round 1.

Alice Pereira's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Ground control defense. Once Cowan committed to an emphatic slam around the 90-second mark of Round 2, Pereira gave up over three minutes of top control. She stayed composed and wall-walked back up, but she offered no submission or reversal threats off her back. An opponent who can hold her down could bank rounds.
• Takedown susceptibility to committed power doubles. She defends the clinch arm-drag well, but when Cowan fully committed to the slam, Pereira went down hard. Her takedown defense ratio sits at a modest 0.3333.
• Leg kicks absorbed. Her stats show 0.4918 leg kicks absorbed per minute against minimal leg kick offense of her own. A disciplined kicker working the lead leg could chip at her base over time.

Here's the catch for Zhelezniakova: exploiting that ground game requires takedowns, and Zhelezniakova lands just 0.307 takedowns per fight. She is not the grappler built to drag Pereira down and keep her there.

Daria Zhelezniakova's Breakdown

The "Iron Lady" carries a 10-3 overall record but sits at 2-2 in the UFC and has dropped 2 of her last 3. She is a classical boxer out of MMA Factory Paris who fights behind movement and volume.

Her signature weapons:

• Jab and counter timing. The jab is her favorite tool. Against Melissa Croden in Round 1, she circled right, timed Croden's entries, and bloodied her nose with a steady jab. Against Mullins at UFC Baku she threw 223 significant strikes, out-landing Mullins badly through the first two rounds.
• Left hook to the liver. Her best offensive moment of the Mullins fight came in Round 2, when a left jab/hook to the liver doubled Mullins over and nearly produced a finish. She targets the body well, landing 16 of 20 body shots in that round.
• Lateral movement and cage craft. She circles to her right away from power, resets to center cage, and picks shots at range. It works beautifully when she is fresh.

Her evolution shows improved clinch defense. Against Croden in Round 1, she fought for underhooks and escaped rather than giving up the takedown, a step up from the Ailin Perez loss where she was taken down and arm-triangled.

Daria Zhelezniakova's Technical Vulnerabilities

• Cardio collapse. This is the big one. Her movement-first game burns fuel, and she fades hard. Against Croden, by mid-Round 2 her output cratered and she could no longer hold range. Against Mullins, her accuracy dropped from 53% in Round 2 to just 31% in Round 3. She has to fight perfectly for 15 minutes to win, and she rarely sustains it.
• Clinch vulnerability under fatigue. When she tires, she cannot stop opponents from clinching. Croden bombarded her with knees and elbows in the clinch in Round 3, took her down, and nearly finished her. She resorted to three fence grabs to survive.
• No power, no finishing threat. She landed clean right hands on Croden's temple and could not discourage the pressure. She has zero knockdowns per fight in the UFC. She cannot make an aggressive opponent respect her.

The warning here is direct: Zhelezniakova lost her most recent fight getting battered and nearly finished, and she has shown she wilts under sustained pressure. Pereira is a finisher who thrives on forward-moving opponents.

Style Matchup Dynamics

Pereira's weapons vs Zhelezniakova's gaps: Pereira's step-in knee is tailor-made for a fighter who circles out and then steps back in to counter. That is exactly how Zhelezniakova lost Cowan the plot last time out. When Zhelezniakova re-engages after circling, she exposes herself up the middle, the precise lane Pereira used to sleep Cowan. Pereira's reach (71 inches vs 68) and looping power also let her meet Zhelezniakova on the way in.

Zhelezniakova's weapons vs Pereira: Her jab and lateral movement could win her early minutes, much like Round 1 against both Croden and Mullins. If she keeps Pereira at the end of the jab and refuses to trade, she can bank an early round. The liver shot is a legitimate threat if Pereira presses carelessly.

Historical parallel: The Croden fight is the blueprint against Zhelezniakova. Pressure, close distance, force her to fight in the pocket, and wait for the cardio to crack. Pereira brings more power than Croden did. Zhelezniakova does not have the wrestling to exploit Pereira's one true hole, the ground, since she averages only 0.307 takedowns per fight.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: Expect Zhelezniakova to find success behind the jab and movement, much like her Round 1 wins over Croden and Mullins. Pereira may start measured, as she did before turning it on against Cowan.
• Mid-fight: This is where it tilts. Zhelezniakova historically fades by mid-Round 2, and Pereira grows into fights. As the movement slows and Zhelezniakova gets caught stepping back in, the knee and power hands come into range.
• Late: If this reaches Round 3, Zhelezniakova has shown she cannot hold the pace or stop the clinch. Pereira's finishing instinct against a tiring, low-power opponent is a dangerous equation for the Iron Lady.

Analysis and Key Points

• Pereira's knee punishes exactly what Zhelezniakova does. Zhelezniakova circles out and steps back in to counter. Cowan did the same and got knocked cold at 4:24 of Round 2.
• Zhelezniakova's cardio is a proven liability. She faded badly against both Croden and Mullins, with accuracy dropping to 31% by Round 3 versus Mullins.
• Zhelezniakova can't exploit Pereira's ground game. Pereira's weakness is being held down, but Zhelezniakova averages just 0.307 takedowns per fight. No wrestling threat.
• Power gap is massive. Pereira has an 86% finish rate; Zhelezniakova has zero UFC knockdowns and cannot deter pressure.
• Recent form warning on Zhelezniakova. She has lost 2 of her last 3 and was nearly finished in her last outing against Croden.

Understanding the Prediction

The model lands on Pereira with a score of 6, and the SHAP breakdown shows why:

• Odds were the biggest driver, pushing the score up by 6.0, reflecting Pereira as the betting favorite at -150.
• recent_win_perc added 3.0, backing Pereira's momentum after the Cowan finish.
• significant_striking_impact_differential (+1.0) and striking_impact_differential (+1.0) favor Pereira's power and damage output.
• reach added 1.0, crediting Pereira's 71-inch frame.
• recent_takedowns_attempted_per_fight added 1.0.
• recent_significant_striking_defense_percentage added 1.0.
• On the other side, recent_significant_striking_impact_differential pulled the score down 2.0, with significant_striking_output_differential and average_striking_output_differential each shaving off 1.0, a nod to Zhelezniakova's higher volume and output numbers.

The output metrics favor Zhelezniakova, but impact, power, reach, and recent form tilt the model firmly toward Pereira.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has one prior read on Pereira and nailed it, predicting her to beat Cowan at a 0.64 score and watching it play out as a Round 2 KO. That is a vote of confidence. There is no prediction history on Zhelezniakova, so the model has no track record to lean on for her side, a minor note of uncertainty but not enough to shift the pick.

Conclusion

Zhelezniakova can win minutes early with her jab and movement, but she cannot hold the pace, cannot deter pressure, and cannot drag Pereira to the mat where the youngster is most vulnerable. Pereira grows into fights, hits with fight-ending power, and her signature knee punishes exactly the kind of step-back-and-re-engage rhythm Zhelezniakova lives on. WolfTicketsAI backs Alice Pereira, and the smart read is a stoppage once the Iron Lady fades.

```

Analysis: Ernesta Kareckaite vs Melissa Gatto

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Ernesta Kareckaite to Win

Score: 9
Odds:
Ernesta Kareckaite: +100
Melissa Gatto: -120

Ernesta Kareckaite's Breakdown

Kareckaite is a pressure-first volume striker who likes to crash forward and turn fights into phone booth brawls. Against Regina Tarin at catchweight, she pressed the action from the opening bell, pinned the newcomer to the cage in round one, and refused to back off even while eating counters. Her offense is more diverse than people expect for a brawler.

Her signature weapons:

• Forward pressure boxing into pocket exchanges. Against Tarin she pinned her to the fence in round one and kept marching forward all three rounds. She throws serious volume, landing 7.84 strikes per minute and 5.62 significant per minute. She does not stop coming.
• Body kick to right hook combinations. She opened round two against Tarin by snapping a body kick and following with a right hook, her best offensive stretch of the night. When she strings kicks into her boxing she becomes much harder to time.
• Opportunistic takedowns off scrambles. She secured a late takedown just before the horn in round two against Tarin, and when Tarin took her back in round three, she popped straight back up and reversed against the fence. She mixes in grappling to break rhythm.

Her technical edge here is physical. At 5'9" with a 71-inch reach, she towers over Gatto's 69-inch frame. Her chin is proven too, as she ate a thudding Tarin left hook that wobbled her early and still fought through three hard rounds without wilting.

Ernesta Kareckaite's Technical Vulnerabilities

• She walks onto counters. This is the big one. Against Tarin, she got timed repeatedly when crashing distance, slipping under her shots and firing back right hands and knees to the body. She led with her face instead of her jab, and the sharper, more damaging blows kept coming back at her. Gatto is a natural counter-striker who times entries for a living.
• She gets eaten up in the clinch. Against Tarin she lost virtually every battle for position in tight, absorbing uppercuts and knees to the midsection despite her reach advantage. Gatto digs knees to the chest and body in the clinch, exactly where Kareckaite struggles.
• She refuses to adjust when losing. In round three against Tarin, a smarter fighter circles out and fights long off the reach. Instead Kareckaite kept swinging in firefights and got outworked by the final flurry. Her defensive striking percentage sits at a leaky 47.5%, and recently worse at 37.7%.

Melissa Gatto's Breakdown

Gatto is the more complete martial artist on paper, a BJJ-savvy counter-striker with real finishing pop. She owns three UFC finishes, including a body kick TKO of Sijara Eubanks and a body punch TKO of Tamires Vidal. She fights smart and patient.

Her signature weapons:

• Counter-striking off opponent aggression. Against Victoria Leonardo she landed preemptive counters almost at will in round two, dropping in an overhand right and walking Leonardo down with body-to-head combos. Against Barbosa she read a spin coming and timed it to grab the back for a takedown. She punishes fighters who come forward carelessly, and that is exactly Kareckaite's game.
• Body attack to break opponents. She body-jabbed Vidal all night to bring the hands down before the finish, and she has a TKO body kick on Eubanks. She targets the midsection to drain cardio and open the head.
• Submission chaining and clinch grappling. Against Leonardo she rolled an armbar into back control with a kimura grip, and she lands clinch trips off body locks. Her 70% takedown defense and 0.39 submissions per fight show the grappling is real.

Her technical evolution shows a fighter who added slick boxing to a grappling base. But the warning signs are loud.

Melissa Gatto's Technical Vulnerabilities

• She cannot win decisions. Gatto is 0-3 when UFC fights hit the scorecards, losing to Cortez, da Silva, and Barbosa. If she does not finish, she tends to lose. Against a durable, high-volume fighter like Kareckaite who ate Tarin's best and kept coming, the finish may not be there.
• She was just brutally knocked out. In her last outing against Barbosa, an illegal soccer kick appeared to knock her cold in round two, and she was hospitalized for a CT scan afterward. She is also coming off nearly two years of inactivity before that fight. Ring rust plus a recent head trauma is a genuine red flag.
• Her takedown defense dipped and she struggles off her back. Barbosa took her down and controlled her through rounds two and three, and she gave up an armbar scare from bottom. She also fades, her output was down against Barbosa, landing only 33 significant strikes over 15 minutes.

Style Matchup Dynamics

This is a classic pressure-brawler versus counter-striker setup, and that normally favors the counter-puncher. The Tarin fight is the blueprint for beating Kareckaite, and Gatto has the exact toolkit Tarin used: counter right hands, clinch knees to the body, and timing on the entries.

But the model sees something different. Kareckaite's relentless volume and output differential are enormous. Her average striking output differential sits at 65.7 against Gatto's 23.5, meaning she throws and lands far more. Gatto's low output, 3.47 significant strikes per minute, means she needs the finish or the clean counters to win, and if she cannot put Kareckaite away, the volume wins rounds. Kareckaite's Tarin fight proved she eats power and keeps marching.

Gatto's clearest path is the body. She kicked and punched her way to TKOs over Eubanks and Vidal by investing downstairs, and Kareckaite absorbs 1.56 body strikes per minute. If Gatto drains her and lands the counter, she finishes. If not, Kareckaite's pace buries her on the cards, the same way Gatto has lost three straight decisions.

Fight Phase Analysis

• Early rounds: Gatto is the sharper technician early. Expect her to counter Kareckaite's entries like she countered Barbosa's spins, and like Tarin countered Kareckaite in round one. Gatto may bank the first round.
• Mid-fight: This is where Kareckaite's volume and reach start to tell. Against Tarin she found her body kick and right hook in round two. If Gatto's output stays low, Kareckaite's sheer activity flips the math.
• Late: Cardio decides it. Gatto faded against Barbosa and is 0-3 in decisions. Kareckaite went to war for 15 minutes with Tarin and never slowed. If this reaches round three close, Kareckaite's gas tank and forward pressure take it, just as her volume stat suggests.

Analysis and Key Points

• Gatto was recently knocked out cold. The Barbosa soccer kick sent her to the hospital. A fighter coming off that kind of trauma carries real risk of it happening again, and Kareckaite has two career KO wins and heavy hands.
• Gatto is 0-3 in UFC decisions. If she does not finish Kareckaite, history says she loses the scorecards. Kareckaite's chin and pace make a finish hard.
• Kareckaite's volume dwarfs Gatto's. 65.7 vs 23.5 average output differential. In a close fight the busier fighter wins rounds.
• Reach and size favor Kareckaite. 71 inches vs 69, plus a two-inch height edge she can use if she fights long.
• Both fighters trend down recently. Each sits at a 33% recent win rate, so this is a battle of fighters trying to stop the slide.
• Gatto's counters and clinch knees are the live danger. Tarin's blueprint works, but Gatto has to stay busy enough to use it over three rounds.

Understanding the Prediction

The model lands on Kareckaite with a confident 9, driven mostly by:

• Odds added the most, 5.0 points, reflecting the near pick-em line that makes Kareckaite live value at +100.
• recent_win_perc added 3.0, a tight recent record comparison between two fighters on cold streaks.
• trueskill added 2.0 despite Gatto holding the higher raw rating, so this was balanced by other factors.
• Striking impact and output differentials each added 1.0, rewarding Kareckaite's massive volume edge.
• Reach added 1.0 for her 71-inch frame.
• Striking defense percentage added 1.0.

Features like win streak difference, recent takedowns attempted, and recent output differentials moved the needle 0.0, so they did not shape this call.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has no prediction history on Kareckaite, so her side carries built-in uncertainty. On Gatto the model is 2-1. It correctly tabbed Barbosa over her last time out and correctly picked Cortez over her, but it wrongly backed Gatto against Ariane da Silva in a split decision loss. The pattern is telling: the model has twice correctly picked against Gatto, and both times she lost. That lines up with the pick here.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI takes Ernesta Kareckaite, and the logic holds up. Gatto is the cleaner technician, but she is 0-3 in decisions, coming off a brutal knockout and a long layoff, and relies on finishes she may not get against a durable, high-volume opponent. Kareckaite's pressure, reach, chin, and sheer output are built to drag Gatto into exactly the kind of long fight she keeps losing. Back Kareckaite at +100.