The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Basic Prediction
This prediction was made before July 20th, 2024 and does not include detailed insights.
Score: 16 Odds: Nate Landwehr: +162 Jamall Emmers: -210
Nate "The Train" Landwehr is a tenacious fighter known for his high-pressure style and willingness to brawl. He pushes forward aggressively, often eating shots to land his own. While this makes for exciting fights, it also leaves him open defensively.
In his recent loss to Dan Ige, Landwehr's limitations were exposed against a technical striker who could maintain distance. However, just prior to that he showcased improved grappling by submitting Austin Lingo. Landwehr's best path to victory is dragging opponents into a slugfest.
Jamall Emmers is a well-rounded fighter with crisp striking and solid wrestling. He's adept at mixing up his attacks, seamlessly transitioning between boxing combinations and takedown attempts.
In his last fight, Emmers showcased his punching power by knocking out Dennis Buzukja in the first round. Prior to that, he suffered a close split decision loss to Jack Jenkins, but the WolfTickets model still favored him in that matchup.
Emmers' diverse skill set makes him a tricky matchup for many featherweights. He can win fights anywhere, whether it's outpointing opponents on the feet or grinding them out with grappling.
This matchup pits Landwehr's relentless pressure against Emmers' technical prowess. Landwehr will look to make it an ugly brawl, wading forward behind hooks and uppercuts. Emmers' key is maintaining distance with his jab and mixing in takedowns to slow Landwehr's advance.
The longer the fight stays at range, the better for Emmers. He's the cleaner striker and can pick apart Landwehr from the outside. If Landwehr gets inside, expect Emmers to tie him up or change levels for a takedown.
Conditioning could play a big factor. Landwehr pushes a frenetic pace but has faded down the stretch in fights. Emmers may have the edge if it goes the distance.
Defensively, Emmers holds the clear advantage. He's harder to hit cleanly and is more apt at avoiding damage. Meanwhile, Landwehr's style is dependent on being able to absorb shots.
Overall, Emmers' paths to victory seem more plentiful. He can outpoint Landwehr on the feet, outlast him in a battle of attrition, or grind him down with wrestling. Landwehr likely needs a knockout or to completely overwhelm Emmers with pressure.
The odds being heavily in Emmers' favor (-210 compared to +162 for Landwehr) decreased the model's score by 10 points, meaning it sees Emmers as a substantial betting favorite.
Emmers' superior recent win percentage increased the score by 2 points, indicating the model puts stock in his current form and momentum.
Interestingly, Landwehr's higher striking impact differential increased the score slightly despite favoring Emmers overall. This may reflect Landwehr's knockout power being his clearest path to victory.
Some of the other key stats slightly decreasing the score for Emmers were his lower TrueSkill rating, recent striking impact differential, and recent average striking output. But overall, the bulk of the data favors him.
In particular, Emmers' 22.39 significant striking output differential dwarfs Landwehr's 4.64, painting the picture of the more active and accurate striker. He also attempts far more takedowns (5.76 per fight vs Landwehr's 2.45).
The model has been up and down in predicting both fighters. For Landwehr, it correctly pegged his last two fights but wrongly picked him to lose to Onama before that.
With Emmers, it has leaned heavily toward him, picking him in his last 3 bouts. However, it was burned by the split decision loss to Jenkins after predicting a win with 72% confidence.
So while the model's recent track record is solid, it's not infallible. The Jenkins fight in particular highlights how close matchups can easily go either way despite what the numbers suggest.
All signs point to Jamall Emmers being a stylistic nightmare for Nate Landwehr. His multi-faceted game and ability to dictate range give him a clear edge on paper.
However, Landwehr's intangibles can't be discounted. His heart, durability and swarming pressure have carried him to victory in fights he was expected to lose. If he can turn it into a brawl and land something big early, an upset is very possible.
Ultimately, the pick is Emmers via decision. His striking and wrestling advantages should be enough to navigate Landwehr's aggressive style. But don't be shocked if the "The Train" throws predictions off the track and finds a way to win.
Stat | Nate Landwehr | Jamall Emmers | Weight Class Average | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Stats | ||||
Age | 35 | 34 | 31 | |
Height | 69" | 70" | 69" | |
Reach | 72" | 74" | 71" | |
Win Percentage | 77.27% | 74.07% | 79.87% | |
Wins | 18 | 20 | ||
Losses | 5 | 8 | ||
Wins at Weight Class | 4 | 3 | ||
Losses at Weight Class | 3 | 3 | ||
Striking Stats | ||||
Striking Accuracy | 49.76% | 48.02% | 48.38% | |
Significant Striking Accuracy | 46.85% | 45.73% | 42.22% | |
Strikes Landed Per Minute | 7.322 | 5.598 | 5.243 | |
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute | 6.140 | 4.785 | 3.629 | |
Knockdowns per Fight | 0.000 | 0.239 | 0.349 | |
Striking Impact Differential | 12.43% | 10.17% | 4.28% | |
Significant Striking Impact Differential | 5.57% | 15.50% | 2.53% | |
Striking Output Differential | 15.71% | 18.00% | 8.36% | |
Significant Striking Output Differential | 5.43% | 22.17% | 5.97% | |
Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 96.50% | 94.87% | 79.37% | |
Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 113.69% | 105.33% | 101.14% | |
Striking Defense Percentage | 55.56% | 60.42% | 46.44% | |
Takedown and Submission Stats | ||||
Submissions per Fight | 1.068 | 0.239 | 0.640 | |
Takedowns per Fight | 1.068 | 2.153 | 1.424 | |
Takedowns Attempted per Fight | 2.564 | 5.263 | 3.841 | |
Takedown Defense | 15.79% | 11.11% | 82.55% | |
Takedown Accuracy | 41.67% | 40.91% | 32.80% | |
Head Stats | ||||
Head Strikes Landed per Minute | 4.388 | 2.456 | 2.284 | |
Head Strikes Attempted per Minute | 10.427 | 6.954 | 5.976 | |
Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 4.060 | 1.898 | 2.184 | |
Body Stats | ||||
Body Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.855 | 1.531 | 0.790 | |
Body Strikes Attempted per Minute | 1.539 | 2.249 | 1.128 | |
Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 1.182 | 0.670 | 0.911 | |
Leg Stats | ||||
Leg Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.897 | 0.797 | 0.555 | |
Leg kicks Attempted per Minute | 1.140 | 1.260 | 0.678 | |
Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute | 0.342 | 0.734 | 0.544 | |
Clinch Stats | ||||
Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute | 1.311 | 0.590 | 0.432 | |
Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute | 1.838 | 0.797 | 0.584 | |
Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.456 | 0.271 | 0.561 |
Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 10, 2023 | Featherweight | Dan Ige | Nate Landwehr | Dan Ige | |
March 25, 2023 | Featherweight | Nate Landwehr | Austin Lingo | Nate Landwehr | |
Aug. 13, 2022 | Featherweight | Nate Landwehr | David Onama | Nate Landwehr | |
Oct. 16, 2021 | Featherweight | Nate Landwehr | Ludovit Klein | Nate Landwehr | |
Feb. 20, 2021 | Featherweight | Nate Landwehr | Julian Erosa | Julian Erosa | |
May 16, 2020 | Featherweight | Darren Elkins | Nate Landwehr | Nate Landwehr | |
Jan. 25, 2020 | Featherweight | Herbert Burns | Nate Landwehr | Herbert Burns |
Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov. 11, 2023 | Featherweight | Dennis Buzukja | Jamall Emmers | Jamall Emmers | |
June 24, 2023 | Featherweight | Jamall Emmers | Jack Jenkins | Jack Jenkins | |
Feb. 18, 2023 | Featherweight | Jamall Emmers | Khusein Askhabov | Jamall Emmers | |
Aug. 28, 2021 | Featherweight | Jamall Emmers | Pat Sabatini | Pat Sabatini | |
Aug. 1, 2020 | Featherweight | Jamall Emmers | Vince Cachero | Jamall Emmers | |
March 7, 2020 | Featherweight | Giga Chikadze | Jamall Emmers | Giga Chikadze |