Results: Nate Landwehr vs. Jamall Emmers

Winner: Nate Landwehr by KO/TKO

Fight Info:
Location: Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA
Elevation: 2.00m
Weight Class: Featherweight
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org…

The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.

The predictions below are shown in dark grey if they were correct, incorxrect predictions are shown in red.
Predictions
Fighter
WolfTicketsAI
Profit
Plain
Odds When Predicted

Weighted Scoring Report

Fight Analysis

Analysis: Nate Landwehr vs Jamall Emmers

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Jamall Emmers to Win

Score: 16 Odds: Nate Landwehr: +162 Jamall Emmers: -210

Nate Landwehr's Breakdown

Nate "The Train" Landwehr is a tenacious fighter known for his high-pressure style and willingness to brawl. He pushes forward aggressively, often eating shots to land his own. While this makes for exciting fights, it also leaves him open defensively.

In his recent loss to Dan Ige, Landwehr's limitations were exposed against a technical striker who could maintain distance. However, just prior to that he showcased improved grappling by submitting Austin Lingo. Landwehr's best path to victory is dragging opponents into a slugfest.

Jamall Emmers's Breakdown

Jamall Emmers is a well-rounded fighter with crisp striking and solid wrestling. He's adept at mixing up his attacks, seamlessly transitioning between boxing combinations and takedown attempts.

In his last fight, Emmers showcased his punching power by knocking out Dennis Buzukja in the first round. Prior to that, he suffered a close split decision loss to Jack Jenkins, but the WolfTickets model still favored him in that matchup.

Emmers' diverse skill set makes him a tricky matchup for many featherweights. He can win fights anywhere, whether it's outpointing opponents on the feet or grinding them out with grappling.

Analysis and Key Points

This matchup pits Landwehr's relentless pressure against Emmers' technical prowess. Landwehr will look to make it an ugly brawl, wading forward behind hooks and uppercuts. Emmers' key is maintaining distance with his jab and mixing in takedowns to slow Landwehr's advance.

The longer the fight stays at range, the better for Emmers. He's the cleaner striker and can pick apart Landwehr from the outside. If Landwehr gets inside, expect Emmers to tie him up or change levels for a takedown.

Conditioning could play a big factor. Landwehr pushes a frenetic pace but has faded down the stretch in fights. Emmers may have the edge if it goes the distance.

Defensively, Emmers holds the clear advantage. He's harder to hit cleanly and is more apt at avoiding damage. Meanwhile, Landwehr's style is dependent on being able to absorb shots.

Overall, Emmers' paths to victory seem more plentiful. He can outpoint Landwehr on the feet, outlast him in a battle of attrition, or grind him down with wrestling. Landwehr likely needs a knockout or to completely overwhelm Emmers with pressure.

Understanding the Prediction

The odds being heavily in Emmers' favor (-210 compared to +162 for Landwehr) decreased the model's score by 10 points, meaning it sees Emmers as a substantial betting favorite.

Emmers' superior recent win percentage increased the score by 2 points, indicating the model puts stock in his current form and momentum.

Interestingly, Landwehr's higher striking impact differential increased the score slightly despite favoring Emmers overall. This may reflect Landwehr's knockout power being his clearest path to victory.

Some of the other key stats slightly decreasing the score for Emmers were his lower TrueSkill rating, recent striking impact differential, and recent average striking output. But overall, the bulk of the data favors him.

In particular, Emmers' 22.39 significant striking output differential dwarfs Landwehr's 4.64, painting the picture of the more active and accurate striker. He also attempts far more takedowns (5.76 per fight vs Landwehr's 2.45).

Past Model Performance

The model has been up and down in predicting both fighters. For Landwehr, it correctly pegged his last two fights but wrongly picked him to lose to Onama before that.

With Emmers, it has leaned heavily toward him, picking him in his last 3 bouts. However, it was burned by the split decision loss to Jenkins after predicting a win with 72% confidence.

So while the model's recent track record is solid, it's not infallible. The Jenkins fight in particular highlights how close matchups can easily go either way despite what the numbers suggest.

Conclusion

All signs point to Jamall Emmers being a stylistic nightmare for Nate Landwehr. His multi-faceted game and ability to dictate range give him a clear edge on paper.

However, Landwehr's intangibles can't be discounted. His heart, durability and swarming pressure have carried him to victory in fights he was expected to lose. If he can turn it into a brawl and land something big early, an upset is very possible.

Ultimately, the pick is Emmers via decision. His striking and wrestling advantages should be enough to navigate Landwehr's aggressive style. But don't be shocked if the "The Train" throws predictions off the track and finds a way to win.

Stat Breakdown

Stat Nate Landwehr Jamall Emmers
Main Stats
Age 35 34
Height 69" 70"
Reach 72" 74"
Win Percentage 77.27% 74.07%
Wins 18 20
Losses 5 8
Wins at Weight Class 4 3
Losses at Weight Class 3 3
Striking Stats
Striking Accuracy 49.76% 48.02%
Significant Striking Accuracy 46.85% 45.73%
Strikes Landed Per Minute 7.322 5.598
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute 6.140 4.785
Knockdowns per Fight 0.000 0.239
Striking Impact Differential 12.43% 10.17%
Significant Striking Impact Differential 5.57% 15.50%
Striking Output Differential 15.71% 18.00%
Significant Striking Output Differential 5.43% 22.17%
Striking Defense to Offense Ratio 96.50% 94.87%
Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio 113.69% 105.33%
Striking Defense Percentage 55.56% 60.42%
Takedown and Submission Stats
Submissions per Fight 1.068 0.239
Takedowns per Fight 1.068 2.153
Takedowns Attempted per Fight 2.564 5.263
Takedown Defense 15.79% 11.11%
Takedown Accuracy 41.67% 40.91%
Head Stats
Head Strikes Landed per Minute 4.388 2.456
Head Strikes Attempted per Minute 10.427 6.954
Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute 4.060 1.898
Body Stats
Body Strikes Landed per Minute 0.855 1.531
Body Strikes Attempted per Minute 1.539 2.249
Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute 1.182 0.670
Leg Stats
Leg Strikes Landed per Minute 0.897 0.797
Leg kicks Attempted per Minute 1.140 1.260
Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute 0.342 0.734
Clinch Stats
Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute 1.311 0.590
Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute 1.838 0.797
Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute 0.456 0.271
Nate Landwehr History:
Date Weight Red Corner Blue Corner Winner
June 10, 2023 Featherweight Dan Ige Nate Landwehr Dan Ige
March 25, 2023 Featherweight Nate Landwehr Austin Lingo Nate Landwehr
Aug. 13, 2022 Featherweight Nate Landwehr David Onama Nate Landwehr
Oct. 16, 2021 Featherweight Nate Landwehr Ludovit Klein Nate Landwehr
Feb. 20, 2021 Featherweight Nate Landwehr Julian Erosa Julian Erosa
May 16, 2020 Featherweight Darren Elkins Nate Landwehr Nate Landwehr
Jan. 25, 2020 Featherweight Herbert Burns Nate Landwehr Herbert Burns
Jamall Emmers History:
Date Weight Red Corner Blue Corner Winner
Nov. 11, 2023 Featherweight Dennis Buzukja Jamall Emmers Jamall Emmers
June 24, 2023 Featherweight Jamall Emmers Jack Jenkins Jack Jenkins
Feb. 18, 2023 Featherweight Jamall Emmers Khusein Askhabov Jamall Emmers
Aug. 28, 2021 Featherweight Jamall Emmers Pat Sabatini Pat Sabatini
Aug. 1, 2020 Featherweight Jamall Emmers Vince Cachero Jamall Emmers
March 7, 2020 Featherweight Giga Chikadze Jamall Emmers Giga Chikadze