WTAI Model | Profit Model | Plain Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full | Main | Under | Full | Main | Under | Full |
60.0% | 66.67% | 62.5% | 80.0% | 33.33% | 62.5% | 80.0% | 33.33% | 62.5% |
WTAI Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
60.0% | 66.67% | 62.5% |
Profit Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
80.0% | 33.33% | 62.5% |
Plain Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
80.0% | 33.33% | 62.5% |
The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Score: 3
Odds:
Marvin Vettori: -156
Roman Dolidze: 122
Marvin "The Italian Dream" Vettori brings remarkable durability and consistent pressure to the octagon. His chin is legendary – he's never been finished in the UFC despite facing heavy hitters like Jared Cannonier and Robert Whittaker. Against Cannonier, Vettori absorbed significant punishment while pressing forward, showing his trademark toughness. He's extremely difficult to put away, continuing to march forward even after "1000 blows to the head" as witnessed in that five-round war.
Vettori's striking is technically sound but lacks finishing power. Against Jack Hermansson, he landed clean strikes that clearly bothered his opponent but couldn't secure a finish. His left hand counter has proven effective, particularly against orthodox fighters, as he demonstrated in the early rounds against Cannonier, repeatedly landing overhand lefts that rocked him multiple times.
What truly separates Vettori is his grappling and wrestling – skills he showcased masterfully in their first meeting in March 2023. Vettori controlled Dolidze with relentless pressure, securing takedowns and neutralizing Dolidze's dynamic but sometimes wild offense. His cardio allows him to maintain this pressure for all rounds, a factor that proved decisive in their previous matchup.
Dolidze is one of the division's most dangerous opportunists. His creative grappling, particularly his leg attacks, makes him a threat in any position. Against Jack Hermansson, he showed his technical grappling brilliance by using modern guard techniques, including the bicep anchor and K-guard, to set up a vicious calf slicer that led to the finish.
His striking has evolved significantly. Against Phil Hawes and Kyle Daukaus, Dolidze secured first-round knockouts, showing his tremendous finishing instinct. The Daukaus finish was particularly impressive – Dolidze initiated a clinch, then timed a perfect left hook on the exit followed by a devastating knee against the fence.
However, Dolidze struggles with consistency. His striking looks formidable when he's confident but falters when opponents neutralize his initial offense. Against Nassourdine Imavov, Dolidze repeatedly pushed him to the fence but couldn't convert these positions into takedowns or meaningful offense. This inconsistency was also evident in their first meeting, where Vettori's constant pressure negated Dolidze's explosive attacks.
When these middleweights first clashed in March 2023, Vettori implemented a masterclass in pressure fighting. He neutralized Dolidze's dangerous grappling by controlling the clinch, securing timely takedowns, and maintaining relentless forward momentum. Dolidze struggled to implement his creative offense as Vettori simply wouldn't give him space to work. The fight went the distance with Vettori winning a clear unanimous decision by outworking Dolidze through consistent pressure and superior cardio.
WolfTicketsAI's model favors Vettori with several key factors influencing this pick:
WolfTicketsAI has a mixed but ultimately favorable history predicting these fighters. The model correctly predicted Vettori's unanimous decision victory in their first meeting with a 0.71 confidence score. The model has gone 2-2 on Vettori's recent fights, accurately calling his win against Dolidze but missing on his loss to Cannonier.
For Dolidze, the model has struggled more, going 3-4 in his recent fights. Notably, it incorrectly predicted losses in his impressive finishes of Jack Hermansson and Phil Hawes, underestimating his finishing ability. However, the model correctly predicted his loss to Imavov and win over Anthony Smith, suggesting it's getting better at gauging his performances.
Expect Vettori to implement the same gameplan that earned him a clear decision in their first meeting. His relentless pressure, superior cardio, and proven ability to neutralize Dolidze's creative offense should carry him to victory once again. While Dolidze always presents a finishing threat with his powerful strikes and crafty submissions, Vettori's legendary durability and consistent approach make him the rightful favorite. WolfTicketsAI sees Vettori grinding out another decision victory through superior fundamentals and pressure fighting.
Score: 11
Odds:
Chidi Njokuani: +162
Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos: -210
"Bang Bang" Njokuani brings impressive technical striking skills to this welterweight clash, having recently transitioned down from middleweight. His background in Muay Thai shows in his ability to control distance and unleash devastating counter-strikes. In his last two outings, Njokuani has picked up back-to-back decision victories, showing his striking accuracy and evolution as a fighter. Against Jared Gooden, he expertly maintained distance using his 80" reach, utilizing the jab effectively to stay out of danger and secure a unanimous decision.
Njokuani's knockout power remains his most dangerous weapon. Against Dusko Todorovic, he showcased this with a perfectly timed elbow during a clinch break that ended the fight instantly. Similar devastating power was on display when he flattened Marc-Andre Barriault with a textbook counter 1-2 combination in just 15 seconds. However, Njokuani has shown vulnerability to pressure fighters who can close distance and neutralize his preferred range - something that cost him against Michal Oleksiejczuk who overwhelmed him for a first-round TKO in August 2023.
"Capoeira" dos Santos brings an unorthodox and dynamic fighting style to the octagon. The Brazilian veteran has evolved from a wild brawler into a more technical striker while maintaining his fight-ending power. In his most recent appearance, he showcased his patient counterstriking against Zachary Scroggin, cutting off the cage methodically before landing a clean strike to the chin that ended the fight via TKO.
Dos Santos possesses a skilled ground game as well, holding a black belt in BJJ which complements his striking arsenal. Against Curtis Millender, he transitioned seamlessly from striking to grappling to secure a submission victory. His kicking game is particularly noteworthy - in his fight against Rinat Fakhretdinov, dos Santos employed a relentless front kick to the body that sapped his opponent's cardio, allowing him to dominate the third round so thoroughly that he earned a 10-8 score, resulting in a draw despite losing the first two rounds.
While dos Santos has shown improved technical striking, he's struggled against fighters with significant reach advantages, as seen in his unanimous decision loss to Randy Brown. At 37 years old, questions remain about his ability to close distance against the rangier Njokuani without exposing himself to counter strikes.
Striking Battle: Njokuani possesses a significant 7-inch reach advantage that he'll need to utilize effectively. Expect him to work his jab to maintain distance, similar to how he neutralized Gooden's attempts to close range.
Power Edge: Both fighters carry knockout power, but Njokuani's precision counters have produced more spectacular finishes. His elbow KO against Todorovic and lightning-fast KO of Barriault demonstrate his ability to end fights with single strikes.
Cardio Considerations: Dos Santos has shown excellent cardio in three-round fights, particularly against Fakhretdinov where he dominated the third round. Njokuani has sometimes faded in later rounds, as seen in his fight against Duraev.
Clinch Danger: The clinch break represents a high-risk moment for both fighters. Njokuani's devastating elbow KO of Todorovic came during a clinch separation, while dos Santos has shown excellent pressure against the cage.
Experience Factor: Dos Santos holds more UFC experience at welterweight, which could be significant as Njokuani continues his adjustment to the division.
Despite Njokuani's recent success, WolfTicketsAI favors Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos with a confidence score of 11. This prediction stems from several key statistical factors:
WolfTicketsAI has a mixed record predicting both fighters. The model correctly predicted Njokuani's victories over Jared Gooden and Rhys McKee but missed on three consecutive fights before that, overestimating his chances against Oleksiejczuk, Duraev, and Rodrigues - all fights Njokuani lost.
For dos Santos, the model has been inconsistent, correctly predicting his loss to Randy Brown, but incorrectly forecasting losses to both Rinat Fakhretdinov (resulted in a draw) and Abubakar Nurmagomedov (dos Santos won by split decision).
While Njokuani's reach advantage and counter-striking present significant challenges, WolfTicketsAI sees dos Santos' more consistent recent performances, striking impact, and overall skill level as decisive factors. The model predicts Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos will overcome the reach disadvantage to secure a victory in this welterweight clash.
Score: 5
Odds:
Alexander Hernandez: -184
Kurt Holobaugh: 142
Hernandez brings a technically sound striking game to this lightweight bout, though his recent performances show a fighter who's had trouble finding consistency. After beginning his UFC career with a stunning 42-second knockout of Beneil Dariush, Hernandez has alternated between impressive victories and disappointing losses.
His fight against Austin Hubbard last October resulted in a split decision win where he effectively used his jab to control distance and dictate the pace. This control was key to neutralizing Hubbard's clinch attempts - a blueprint he'll likely follow against Holobaugh. However, his recent performances at featherweight raise concerns, dropping back-to-back decisions to Damon Jackson and Bill Algeo before returning to lightweight.
Hernandez's best weapon remains his explosive first-round energy. Against Mike Breeden, he secured a 1:20 knockout by overwhelming his opponent with pressure and power. The problem is sustainability - as seen against Billy Quarantillo, where he dominated early with devastating elbows that "tore through Quarantillo's face like tissue paper" before fading dramatically in later rounds, ultimately getting finished in round two.
Holobaugh brings a well-rounded skillset with dangerous submission abilities, proven by his triangle choke victory over Austin Hubbard. His grappling transitions are fluid - against Hubbard, he methodically worked to mount position before chaining submission attempts, transitioning from an armbar to a triangle when Hubbard defended.
Holobaugh's ground game will be his clearest path to victory against Hernandez, but his approach isn't one-dimensional. Against Kaynan Kruschewsky in July, he relied on his jab to control distance and pace en route to a unanimous decision win. This striking control was disrupted in his previous bout against Trey Ogden, where he struggled with Ogden's pressure and couldn't establish his rhythm.
Holobaugh's durability is concerning - he's been knocked out by Raoni Barcelos and submitted by Shane Burgos, suggesting vulnerability against explosive attackers like Hernandez. His defensive striking will be crucial in weathering Hernandez's early storm.
Hernandez's cardio issues are a critical factor - he consistently starts strong but fades dramatically after round one. Against Quarantillo, this pattern was his undoing despite early success.
Grappling advantage favors Holobaugh - his triangle finish of Hubbard demonstrates superior chain wrestling compared to Hernandez, who was caught in a submission by Renato Moicano after lingering too long in exchanges.
First round dynamics will be crucial - Hernandez has seven first-round finishes and overwhelms opponents early, while Holobaugh needs to weather this storm to implement his more measured approach.
Striking defense is key - Hernandez's 53.4% striking defense percentage gives him a significant advantage over Holobaugh's 36.2%, which will be critical during explosive exchanges.
Recent performances trend in opposite directions - Hernandez has lost 2 of his last 3 fights, while Holobaugh has won 2 of his last 3.
Several key factors have influenced WolfTicketsAI's confidence in Hernandez:
However, Recent Win Percentage decreased the score by 2.0, acknowledging Hernandez's recent struggles with only a 33% win rate in his last fights.
WolfTicketsAI has a mixed record predicting these fighters. For Hernandez, the model has been right twice and wrong twice in his last four fights, correctly calling his losses to Bill Algeo and Billy Quarantillo but missing on his split decision loss to Damon Jackson and his win over Jim Miller.
For Holobaugh, WolfTicketsAI correctly predicted his unanimous decision loss to Trey Ogden but missed on his wins against Kaynan Kruschewsky and Austin Hubbard. This inconsistent track record suggests some uncertainty in the prediction.
Expect Alexander Hernandez to win this lightweight clash by capitalizing on his superior striking defense and first-round explosiveness. The odds, striking metrics, and physical advantages all point to Hernandez maintaining distance with his jab and landing more significant strikes. While Holobaugh presents submission threats if the fight goes to the ground, Hernandez's technical striking and defensive awareness should earn him the victory as WolfTicketsAI predicts.
Score: 27
Odds:
Da'Mon Blackshear: -500
Cody Gibson: +340
Blackshear brings a dangerous submission arsenal to the cage with a heightened emphasis on finding openings for chokes and creative submissions. His technical grappling was on full display against Jose Johnson, securing a rare twister submission by capitalizing on Johnson's defensive errors. When Johnson tried throwing back elbows while Blackshear had back control, Blackshear immediately exploited these openings - demonstrating his ability to punish even minor defensive lapses.
Against Cody Stamann, Blackshear showcased impressive striking evolution, employing creative hand traps before firing a straight right down the middle. This technique neutralized Stamann's defense while creating a clean path for his power hand. After establishing this pattern, he mixed in proper left hooks followed by straight rights, creating confusion in Stamann's defensive reads. The fight-changing moment came with a perfectly timed double pump flying knee against the fence, catching Stamann before finishing with a rear-naked choke.
Blackshear's recent loss to Montel Jackson exposed vulnerability to powerful strikers, getting caught early for a first-round KO. However, his bounce-back submission win over Stamann shows his ability to adapt and overcome setbacks. His patient approach to submissions has been a consistent factor in his success, waiting for opponents to make defensive errors rather than forcing submissions.
Gibson has shown solid technical striking combined with timely wrestling in recent performances. Against Chad Anheliger, his takedown game was particularly impressive, utilizing well-timed level changes and foot sweeps to establish dominant positions. These techniques required minimal energy expenditure while yielding optimal positioning - bypassing his opponent's guard directly to dominant control.
Against Brian Kelleher, Gibson demonstrated his grappling proficiency by securing a first-round submission via arm-triangle choke. This technique allowed him to transition seamlessly from striking to grappling, catching Kelleher off guard. Gibson's high-volume striking approach combined with his wrestling background creates a tough stylistic challenge.
Gibson's technical approach was evident against Miles Johns, where he effectively intercepted Johns' forward movement with well-timed strikes. When Johns committed to forward pressure, Gibson capitalized with counters, showing excellent timing and spatial awareness. However, Gibson has shown vulnerability when forced to fight off his back foot for extended periods, which could be exploited by Blackshear's counter-focused approach.
Striking evolution vs fundamental approach: Blackshear has shown significant striking improvement, particularly using creative hand traps and flying knees, while Gibson relies on more fundamental boxing and wrestling combinations.
Submission threats: Blackshear's submission game poses a significant threat, with creative finishes like the twister against Johnson and a recent rear-naked choke of Stamann. Gibson must be extremely cautious about defensive responses when taken down.
Takedown strategies: Gibson's foot sweeps and clinch control will test Blackshear's takedown defense, which has been exploited in previous fights. However, Blackshear's counter knee threat significantly complicates takedown entries, as seen in the Stamann fight.
Counter striking: Blackshear's counter-focused approach with flying knees against the fence makes pressuring him risky, while Gibson's intercepting strikes when opponents commit to forward pressure could create interesting counter-vs-counter dynamics.
Recent momentum: Blackshear is coming off an impressive submission win over Stamann, while Gibson has won two straight with a submission of Kelleher and decision over Anheliger.
WolfTicketsAI's strong prediction for Blackshear is influenced by several key factors:
WolfTicketsAI has been accurate predicting both fighters' recent outings. For Blackshear, the model correctly predicted his submission win over Stamann and his losses to Jackson and Bautista, showing consistent accuracy across his different outcomes.
For Gibson, the model has a perfect record, correctly picking his recent wins over Anheliger and Kelleher, as well as his loss to Johns. This consistent accuracy on both fighters adds significant confidence to the current prediction for Blackshear.
WolfTicketsAI's model gives Blackshear a significant edge in this bantamweight clash. The factors heavily favoring Blackshear include the betting odds, striking impact metrics, and defensive statistics. While Gibson brings solid fundamentals and a two-fight win streak, Blackshear's dangerous submission game, improved striking, and ability to capitalize on opponents' defensive errors make him the clear favorite. Expect Blackshear to use his counter striking to set up submission opportunities en route to a victory.
Score: 35
Odds:
SuYoung You: -770
AJ Cunningham: 470
"Yoo-Jitsu" brings a well-rounded game to this bantamweight clash, mixing grappling expertise with effective striking control. His recent unanimous decision win over Baergeng Jieleyisi showcased his ability to dictate where the fight takes place. You consistently lands 5.6 strikes per minute while absorbing minimal damage, as evident in his impressive 87.5% significant striking defense.
What stands out about You's approach is his takedown game—averaging 2 successful takedowns per fight with a 40% accuracy rate. This allows him to neutralize opponents while working his ground control. Against Jieleyisi, he used this formula to perfection, wearing down his opponent with his balanced attack while staying defensively sound.
His 82.3% career win percentage speaks to his efficiency. You's strengths lie in his methodical approach—he's rarely flashy but consistently effective at implementing a game plan that keeps him safe while scoring points.
"The Savage" Cunningham enters this fight with a 73.3% win percentage but is coming off a KO/TKO loss to Ludovit Klein at lightweight this past March. That knockout raises serious questions about his durability dropping down to bantamweight. Cunningham's striking defense is a glaring weakness—absorbing 8.2 head strikes per minute while only landing 3.2, resulting in a subpar 34% striking defense.
While Cunningham throws volume (7.8 significant strikes per minute), his accuracy sits at just 48%. His leg kicks (2.3 landed per minute) are his most effective weapon, but You's takedown threat could limit Cunningham's ability to establish his kicking range.
Cunningham has shown decent takedown defense (2.0 ratio), but hasn't recorded any offensive takedowns in his UFC stint. This makes him predictable against a grappler like You, who can exploit his defensive holes both standing and on the ground.
The model's confidence in You stems from several key metrics: - Odds boosted the prediction score significantly (+19), reflecting the betting market's strong belief in You - Significant Striking Impact Differential (+7) highlights You's +33 advantage versus Cunningham's -24 - Striking Defense Percentage (+4) recognizes You's superior ability to avoid damage - Recent Takedowns Attempted (+3) values You's wrestling threat that will force Cunningham into defensive mode - Striking Impact Differential (+3) confirms You's overall striking effectiveness
WolfTicketsAI has no previous prediction history for either fighter, which introduces some uncertainty into this pick. However, given the clear statistical advantages You holds in almost every meaningful category, the model's confidence remains justifiable despite the lack of historical validation.
You's superior grappling, defensive prowess, and ability to control fight location will prove too much for Cunningham. The significant defensive liability and recent knockout loss make Cunningham a risky underdog bet despite the attractive odds. WolfTicketsAI confidently picks SuYoung You to outwork Cunningham for either a decision win or potentially find a late submission after wearing down his opponent.
Score: 0
Odds:
Waldo Cortes-Acosta: -172
Ryan Spann: 134
Cortes-Acosta brings a methodical, patient approach to the heavyweight division that's been serving him well. In his recent unanimous decision victory over Robelis Despaigne, he showcased his fight IQ by recognizing Despaigne's limited offensive arsenal and executing a brilliant gameplan. Instead of recklessly pursuing a knockout, Cortes-Acosta waited for Despaigne to overcommit, then secured multiple takedowns in the first and second rounds, effectively neutralizing the 6'7" taekwondo specialist.
Against veteran Andrei Arlovski, Cortes-Acosta employed a clinch-heavy strategy, using his size and strength to control the 45-year-old along the cage. His persistent pressure and dirty boxing in close quarters earned him another decision win. When facing Lukasz Brzeski, Cortes-Acosta demonstrated his developing striking skills, using a stinging jab followed by powerful straight rights while maintaining pressure against the cage. This approach gradually broke down Brzeski's defense and cardio, leading to a first-round KO victory.
What's particularly impressive about Cortes-Acosta is his improved cardio management. Unlike many heavyweights who gas quickly, he's shown an ability to throttle back when necessary to preserve his energy while maintaining effective offense. His only UFC loss came against grappling specialist Marcos Rogerio de Lima, where he struggled to implement his preferred striking game.
Spann is a dangerous finisher with 16 first-round stoppages in his career. His guillotine choke is particularly lethal, accounting for 10 of his 13 submission victories. We saw this technique's effectiveness in his quick win over Ion Cutelaba, where Spann capitalized on Cutelaba's aggressive takedown attempt by securing a devastating guillotine that applied direct pressure to the windpipe rather than just squeezing the sides of the neck.
In his knockout win over Dominick Reyes, Spann's explosive power punching was on full display. His big right hand found the mark against Reyes, who was already compromised from previous knockout losses. Against OSP in October, Spann once again showcased his quick submission skills, securing another first-round finish.
However, Spann has shown vulnerability when his initial attacks don't lead to quick finishes. Against Bogdan Guskov in April, Spann started strong with a takedown and top control in the first round, but appeared to slow down as the fight progressed. Guskov capitalized with a perfectly timed right uppercut as Spann was jabbing, leading to a second-round KO. Similarly, in his loss to Nikita Krylov, Spann made a critical error by rushing headlong at Krylov who was on his back, essentially diving into a triangle choke position.
Size and Division Shift: This marks Spann's move to heavyweight after fighting at light heavyweight. While he has the frame (79" reach), the adjustment to facing bigger, harder-hitting opponents presents significant risks.
Striking Defense Differential: Cortes-Acosta's 52.9% significant striking defense percentage outpaces Spann's 44.5%, suggesting he's the more defensively responsible fighter. This could be crucial as exchanges develop.
Pacing and Cardio: Cortes-Acosta has proven his ability to maintain effectiveness over three rounds, as seen in his victories over Despaigne and Arlovski. Spann has shown a tendency to slow down when unable to secure an early finish.
Clinch Work: Against the fence, Cortes-Acosta excels at dirty boxing and control, as demonstrated in his fight with Arlovski. This could neutralize Spann's height and reach advantage.
First Round Danger: Spann's 16 first-round finishes make him extremely dangerous early. Cortes-Acosta must weather the initial storm while avoiding the guillotine choke that finished fighters like Cutelaba and OSP.
Several statistical factors influenced WolfTicketsAI's pick of Cortes-Acosta:
Conversely, some factors decreased confidence: - TrueSkill reduced the score by 4.0, suggesting Spann's overall skill rating might be higher - Recent Takedowns Attempted decreased the score by 2.0, possibly indicating Spann's grappling threat - Average Striking Output Differential and Recent Average Striking Output Differential each reduced the score by 1.0
WolfTicketsAI has a mixed record predicting both fighters. The model correctly predicted Cortes-Acosta's victories over Brzeski and Arlovski, as well as his win against Sherman, showing good accuracy when backing him as the favorite. However, it failed to predict his victory over Despaigne, incorrectly favoring the taekwondo specialist.
With Spann, the model has been less accurate. It correctly predicted his submission victory over OSP, but missed on his KO victory over Reyes and his submission win over Cutelaba, both times backing his opponents. The model also incorrectly predicted Spann would defeat Guskov and Anthony Smith.
This inconsistent prediction history, particularly with Spann, suggests some caution is warranted despite the model's confidence in Cortes-Acosta.
Cortes-Acosta's patient approach, superior striking defense, and proven cardio give him the edge over Spann's explosive but sometimes reckless style. While Spann presents serious first-round danger with his submission skills and power, Cortes-Acosta's ability to weather early storms and implement strategic pressure should allow him to take control as the fight progresses. WolfTicketsAI predicts Cortes-Acosta will neutralize Spann's early attacks and secure the victory through his more measured, defensively sound approach.
Score: 24
Odds:
Stephanie Luciano: -265
Sam Hughes: 200
Luciano brings a perfect blend of Muay Thai striking and defensive prowess to the women's strawweight division. In her UFC debut against Talita Alencar, "Rondinha" showcased exceptional striking output (5.8 strikes landed per minute) while maintaining an impressive 61% defensive rate. Throughout that fight, she neutralized Alencar's grappling attempts with 83% takedown defense, dictating the pace with precise head kicks and elbow strikes.
Luciano's striking accuracy (57%) has been a key weapon - she consistently lands clean shots while maintaining defensive positioning. Against Alencar, she specifically excelled at controlling distance, preventing her opponent from establishing any grappling advantages. Her high kick attempts were particularly effective, forcing Alencar to hesitate before shooting for takedowns.
The Brazilian striker has demonstrated knockout power with 1.0 knockdowns per fight - an impressive statistic for the women's strawweight division. While her UFC sample size is small, her technique and composure suggest a fighter who can maintain her 86% win percentage against increasingly difficult competition.
Hughes has evolved significantly over her UFC career, showing particular growth in defensive grappling. Against Viktoriia Dudakova, she displayed innovative scrambling techniques - specifically rolling over her shoulder when Dudakova had back control, allowing Hughes to end up in top position. Her technical hand-peeling when opponents attempt back control has become a signature defensive move.
Against Yazmin Jauregui, Hughes struggled with a more technical striker, unable to implement her grappling effectively. However, she rebounded impressively against Jaqueline Amorim, neutralizing the Brazilian jiu-jitsu ace by keeping the fight standing and utilizing her cardio advantage. This strategic approach demonstrates Hughes' fight IQ - she knew avoiding the ground was crucial against a submission specialist.
Hughes' TKO victory over Elise Reed showed her striking power and ability to maintain pressure through three rounds. She wore Reed down with consistent striking, finally finishing her at 3:52 of the third round. This performance showcased Hughes' cardio advantage, likely attributable to her background in track and cross-country running.
Striking Differential: Luciano's significant striking impact differential (+31.0) dwarfs Hughes' numbers (-1.7778), suggesting a major advantage in landing meaningful shots.
Defensive Edge: Luciano's 72.85% significant striking defense versus Hughes' 56.88% means Luciano is far more elusive. Against Alencar, Luciano specifically excelled at slipping punches while maintaining counter position.
Historical Pattern: Hughes has lost 3 of her last 8 fights, with all losses coming against technical strikers (Jauregui, Rodriguez, Torres) - precisely the style Luciano brings.
Weight Class Experience: Hughes' split decision win over Dudakova showed improved defensive grappling, but she hasn't faced a striker with Luciano's Muay Thai background and striking accuracy.
Technical Matchup: Hughes prefers to create scrambles after defending takedowns (as seen against Amorim), but Luciano's 83% takedown defense and counterstriking will make this approach difficult.
The model strongly favors Luciano based on several key factors:
The combination of these factors creates a compelling case for Luciano's technical superiority in this matchup.
WolfTicketsAI has no prediction history for Stephanie Luciano, making this her first evaluation by the model.
For Sam Hughes, the model has a mixed record - correctly predicting her losses to Rodriguez and Jauregui, but failing to predict her victories over Dudakova, Reed, and Nunes. This inconsistency suggests Hughes can occasionally exceed expectations, particularly when facing grapplers. However, the model has accurately predicted Hughes' struggles against technical strikers, which aligns with this matchup against Luciano.
Luciano's technical Muay Thai striking, superior defensive metrics, and knockout power create a stylistic nightmare for Hughes. While Hughes has shown admirable evolution in defensive grappling, her struggles against precise strikers remain evident. Expect Luciano to control distance with her 1-inch reach advantage, maintain a higher striking accuracy, and consistently outstrike Hughes en route to victory. WolfTicketsAI confidently predicts Stephanie Luciano to continue her winning streak in the women's strawweight division.
Score: 18
Odds:
Daniel Barez: +240
Andre Lima: -330
Barez brings technical striking and intelligent cage work to this flyweight matchup. His ability to pressure opponents against the fence was showcased perfectly against Victor Altamirano, where he exploited Altamirano's bladed stance by cutting off escape routes and landing precise combinations. When he gets opponents backed up, Barez excels at reading their positioning errors and capitalizing with clean shots.
His body work is particularly devastating, as evidenced when he dropped Jafel Filho with a perfectly placed body shot. Barez loves setting up these attacks with false entries - feinting to bait counters before unloading his own offense. That shove-to-body kick combination he used against Filho is a signature move that disrupts his opponent's balance before landing damaging strikes.
Despite these strengths, Barez has struggled with consistency, losing two of his last three UFC appearances. His striking defense has shown vulnerabilities, with a recent significant striking defense percentage of just 37.19% - a potential liability against a sharp striker like Lima.
The undefeated Lima (10-0) has quickly made his mark in the UFC's flyweight division with technical striking and surprising adaptability. Against Felipe dos Santos, he showcased excellent distance management through well-timed inside low kicks that disrupted his opponent's rhythm. When dos Santos began anticipating these kicks, Lima seamlessly mixed in body kicks and punches, demonstrating that high-level fight IQ.
Lima's defensive wrestling has been particularly impressive. Against Mitch Raposo, he effectively used a "jab and dip" technique to simultaneously create offensive opportunities while preparing to defend takedowns. His strategic use of the cage against Igor Severino similarly prevented takedown attempts while maintaining striking position.
What stands out about Lima is his composure under pressure. Even in the bizarre situation against Severino (which ended in DQ when Severino bit him), Lima remained calm and professional. This mental fortitude complements his technical skills and makes him difficult to rattle in the octagon.
Technical striking clash - Both fighters are primarily strikers but with different approaches. Barez thrives on pressure and cage cutting, while Lima excels at distance management and counter striking.
Body work differential - Barez's commitment to body attacks (landing 1.36 body strikes per minute compared to Lima's 0.55) could be a key factor, especially if he can back Lima to the fence.
Lima's defense advantage - Lima's recent significant striking defense percentage (59.99%) dramatically outperforms Barez's (37.19%), suggesting Lima will be harder to hit cleanly.
Fight positioning battle - Lima must avoid being backed against the cage where Barez thrives, as we saw against Altamirano. Lima's jab and distance control will be crucial in keeping the fight in open space.
Composure factor - Lima has shown excellent composure in previous fights, while Barez has sometimes struggled under pressure, as seen in his loss to Filho.
The model's 18-point score favoring Lima is influenced by several key factors:
Interestingly, Odds decreased the prediction score by 14 points, suggesting the betting market may be overvaluing Lima. The model still favors him but with less confidence than the betting odds would suggest.
WolfTicketsAI has a perfect record predicting both fighters: correctly calling Barez's victory over Altamirano and Lima's win against dos Santos. This consistent accuracy lends credibility to the current prediction. However, with both fighters having limited UFC experience (Barez with just 2 UFC fights and Lima with 3), the sample size for model predictions remains small.
Lima's combination of technical striking, defensive prowess, and composure should prove too much for Barez. While Barez's pressure and body work will create dangerous moments, Lima's superior defensive statistics and fight IQ give him the edge. Expect Lima to manage distance effectively, avoid the cage positions where Barez thrives, and counter with precision to secure a decision victory or potentially find a late finish as Barez's defense deteriorates.