The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
This radar chart shows each fighter's strengths across key fighting dimensions. Each dimension is scored 0-100 based on their percentile ranking within the Women's Strawweight weight class.
Recent Prediction
This prediction includes detailed insights.
Predicted Winner: Sam Hughes
Weight Class: Women's Strawweight
Final Confidence: 4.9
Value: -30.0%
Reason: Base confidence < 10, decreased by 30%
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Score: 7
Odds:
Shauna Bannon: +220
Sam Hughes: -295
Bannon brings a unique Taekwondo-based striking style that's proven effective against conventional opponents. Her signature high lead leg chamber position creates multiple offensive threats—she can fire sidekicks with stomping motion, axe kicks, and high round kicks from the same setup. Against Puja Tomar, this approach completely disrupted her opponent's timing, forcing constant retreats along the fence before Bannon landed the fight-ending head kick and transitioned to an armbar finish.
Her opportunistic submission hunting showed against Tomar when she immediately recognized the knockdown opportunity and secured the armbar despite momentarily losing control of the arm. Bannon's footwork is built around single-leg balancing positions that maximize her reach advantage while maintaining offensive pressure.
However, her recent performances reveal concerning patterns. Against Alice Ardelean, she repeatedly grabbed the fence—five times according to analysis—suggesting defensive struggles when pressured. The Bruna Brasil fight exposed her tendency to overcommit to power shots when countering, leaving her vulnerable to level changes. Brasil successfully baited Bannon into wild swings before dropping for takedowns.
Over-reliance on single-leg striking postures: When balanced on her chambered lead leg, Bannon becomes susceptible to low kick counters and timed takedowns. Brasil exploited this by timing her entries when Bannon committed to the chambered position, disrupting her balance and creating takedown opportunities.
Defensive awareness during transitions: Her armbar against Tomar showed control issues—she momentarily lost the arm before re-securing it. This suggests insufficient positional control mechanisms during submission attempts, prioritizing the finish over maintaining dominant position.
Overcommitment to counters: Against Brasil, Bannon consistently overextended on power shots when countering jabs, leaving herself off-balance and vulnerable to takedowns. This tendency to abandon defensive positioning for offense has been exploited by opponents who can time their entries.
Hughes operates as a methodical pressure fighter who's evolved significantly in recent performances. Her signature lead hook to body-head combinations create effective level changes that open defensive gaps. Against Stephanie Luciano, she repeatedly landed this sequence, with the overhand right finding its mark consistently in Round 1.
Her reactive clinch entries have become a weapon—when opponents throw wide strikes, Hughes slips inside and establishes collar ties for short elbows and knees. The fight-ending sequence against Luciano at 3:42 of Round 1 showcased this perfectly when she slipped a right hand, secured the collar tie, and landed two damaging elbows.
Hughes has developed reliable double-leg setups off strikes, using her right hand to draw guards up before changing levels. At 2:15 of Round 2 against Luciano, she executed this sequence flawlessly, catching her opponent mid-stance reset. Her ground control has improved markedly—she maintained chest-to-chest pressure against Luciano while landing short strikes, eventually advancing to mount for the arm-triangle finish.
Straight strike defense: Hughes keeps her head on the centerline when advancing, making her susceptible to straight punches down the middle. Against both Luciano and in previous fights, she's absorbed clean straight rights when initiating exchanges, relying on her chin rather than head movement.
Over-commitment to entries: When closing distance, Hughes sometimes overextends on her jab, leaving her momentarily off-balance. Luciano landed short counter hooks during these entries, exposing this timing vulnerability.
High guard predictability: Under pressure, Hughes adopts a shell defense that protects her head but exposes her body. Against Yazmin Jauregui, this pattern was exploited as opponents recognized the defensive shell and targeted the midsection accordingly.
Hughes's pressure-heavy approach directly counters Bannon's single-leg striking postures. When Bannon chambers her lead leg for kicks, Hughes can time low kicks to the posted leg or shoot takedowns underneath the extended position. Hughes's lead hook to body-head combinations specifically target the defensive gaps created when Bannon commits to her chambered stance.
Bannon's high kicks could find success against Hughes's tendency to keep her head on the centerline, but Hughes's improved clinch entries neutralize Bannon's kicking range. Once Hughes establishes collar ties, Bannon's Taekwondo-based distance management becomes ineffective.
The ground phase heavily favors Hughes. Her improved positional control and submission finishing contrast sharply with Bannon's opportunistic but technically flawed submission attempts. Hughes's chest-to-chest pressure and methodical advancement would likely overwhelm Bannon's defensive scrambling.
Early rounds: Hughes's pressure will immediately test Bannon's single-leg striking postures. Bannon's head kicks could find early success against Hughes's centerline positioning, but Hughes's low kick counters to Bannon's posted leg should disrupt her rhythm quickly.
Mid-fight adjustments: As Bannon's chambered stance becomes predictable, Hughes will increase her takedown attempts. Bannon's tendency to overcommit to counters plays directly into Hughes's double-leg setups off strikes.
Championship rounds: Hughes's track background gives her superior cardio. Bannon's complex kicking techniques require more energy than Hughes's boxing-based pressure, creating a conditioning advantage that should compound over time.
• Stylistic mismatch: Hughes's pressure game directly counters Bannon's distance-dependent kicking style • Takedown threat: Hughes averages 1.08 takedowns per fight vs Bannon's 0.0, with Bannon showing defensive struggles when pressured • Ground advantage: Hughes's improved submission finishing vs Bannon's flawed positional control • Cardio edge: Hughes's track background and pressure style should overwhelm Bannon's energy-intensive kicking approach • Experience gap: Hughes has faced higher-level competition and shown better adaptability mid-fight
The model's confidence stems from several key statistical advantages for Hughes. Odds heavily decreased the prediction score by 11.0, reflecting the betting market's strong belief in Hughes. However, Hughes's Recent Significant Striking Output Differential increased confidence by 3.0, showing her improved offensive volume. Her Recent Win Percentage (increased by 2.0) and TrueSkill rating (increased by 1.0) demonstrate consistent performance against quality opposition. Hughes's Reach advantage (increased by 1.0) complements her pressure style, while her Recent Significant Striking Defense Percentage (increased by 1.0) shows improved defensive awareness.
WolfTicketsAI has struggled with Hughes recently, incorrectly predicting against her in two of her last three fights (Luciano and Dudakova). However, the model correctly predicted her losses to Jauregui and Rodriguez, showing accuracy when Hughes faces superior competition. For Bannon, the model correctly predicted her recent win over Tomar, but this fight represents a significant step up in competition level.
Hughes's pressure-heavy boxing style directly exploits Bannon's defensive vulnerabilities when forced off her preferred single-leg striking postures. The takedown threat alone should disrupt Bannon's rhythm, while Hughes's improved clinch work neutralizes the kicking range where Bannon finds success. WolfTicketsAI's prediction of Hughes by decision reflects the stylistic mismatch and Hughes's superior all-around MMA game.
Stat | Shauna Bannon | Sam Hughes | Weight Class Average | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Stats | ||||
Age | 31 | 33 | 32 | |
Height | 65" | 65" | 63" | |
Reach | 65" | 64" | 63" | |
Win Percentage | 87.50% | 62.50% | 75.43% | |
Wins | 7 | 11 | ||
Losses | 2 | 6 | ||
Wins at Weight Class | 2 | 5 | ||
Losses at Weight Class | 1 | 5 | ||
Striking Stats | ||||
Striking Accuracy | 57.26% | 58.11% | 49.79% | |
Significant Striking Accuracy | 43.88% | 46.93% | 42.07% | |
Strikes Landed Per Minute | 8.836 | 7.403 | 5.540 | |
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute | 4.770 | 4.407 | 3.773 | |
Knockdowns per Fight | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.144 | |
Striking Impact Differential | 49.33% | 19.80% | 3.67% | |
Significant Striking Impact Differential | 11.33% | -2.20% | 1.28% | |
Striking Output Differential | 89.33% | -0.10% | 1.51% | |
Significant Striking Output Differential | 50.00% | -22.70% | -1.45% | |
Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 39.23% | 91.44% | 89.99% | |
Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 64.48% | 146.57% | 117.14% | |
Striking Defense Percentage | 44.19% | 58.59% | 50.53% | |
Takedown and Submission Stats | ||||
Submissions per Fight | 0.782 | 0.108 | 0.463 | |
Takedowns per Fight | 0.000 | 1.080 | 1.514 | |
Takedowns Attempted per Fight | 1.564 | 3.349 | 3.669 | |
Takedown Defense | 133.33% | 66.67% | 86.68% | |
Takedown Accuracy | 0.00% | 32.26% | 34.89% | |
Head Stats | ||||
Head Strikes Landed per Minute | 2.137 | 2.967 | 2.339 | |
Head Strikes Attempted per Minute | 6.255 | 7.266 | 6.215 | |
Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 2.450 | 2.434 | 2.208 | |
Body Stats | ||||
Body Strikes Landed per Minute | 1.694 | 0.763 | 0.894 | |
Body Strikes Attempted per Minute | 3.128 | 1.203 | 1.300 | |
Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.886 | 1.563 | 0.867 | |
Leg Stats | ||||
Leg Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.938 | 0.677 | 0.540 | |
Leg kicks Attempted per Minute | 1.486 | 0.922 | 0.695 | |
Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute | 0.547 | 0.569 | 0.562 | |
Clinch Stats | ||||
Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.261 | 0.454 | 0.496 | |
Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.391 | 0.591 | 0.663 | |
Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.443 | 0.814 | 0.492 |
Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 22, 2025 | Women's Strawweight | Shauna Bannon | Puja Tomar | Shauna Bannon | |
July 27, 2024 | Women's Strawweight | Shauna Bannon | Alice Ardelean | Shauna Bannon | |
July 22, 2023 | Women's Strawweight | Shauna Bannon | Bruna Brasil | Bruna Brasil |
Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 15, 2025 | Women's Strawweight | Stephanie Luciano | Sam Hughes | Sam Hughes | |
Aug. 3, 2024 | Women's Strawweight | Viktoriia Dudakova | Sam Hughes | Sam Hughes | |
Feb. 24, 2024 | Women's Strawweight | Yazmin Jauregui | Sam Hughes | Yazmin Jauregui | |
April 8, 2023 | Women's Strawweight | Jaqueline Amorim | Sam Hughes | Sam Hughes | |
Oct. 15, 2022 | Women's Strawweight | Piera Rodriguez | Sam Hughes | Piera Rodriguez | |
May 21, 2022 | Women's Strawweight | Elise Reed | Sam Hughes | Sam Hughes | |
April 16, 2022 | Women's Strawweight | Istela Nunes | Sam Hughes | Sam Hughes | |
Nov. 20, 2021 | Women's Strawweight | Luana Pinheiro | Sam Hughes | Luana Pinheiro | |
May 1, 2021 | Women's Strawweight | Loma Lookboonmee | Sam Hughes | Loma Lookboonmee | |
Dec. 12, 2020 | Women's Strawweight | Tecia Pennington | Sam Hughes | Tecia Pennington |