The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Recent Prediction
This prediction includes detailed insights.
Predicted Winner: Bia Mesquita
Weight Class: Women's Bantamweight
Final Confidence: 29
Value: +0.0%
Reason: Base confidence >= 27, no change
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Score: 29
Odds:
Bia Mesquita: -800
Montse Rendon: +575
Bia Mesquita enters this fight as one of the most credentialed grapplers to ever transition into MMA. She's 6-0 in her professional career and already has a UFC finish under her belt. Her submission victory over Irina Alekseeva showed exactly what makes her dangerous.
Signature Techniques:
Reactive Closed Guard Armbar - This is her bread and butter from ADCC competition. She baits opponents into hand fighting, lets them grip her wrists, then throws her arm overhead like an old school rising block while jumping her legs around the shoulder. It's unorthodox and catches fighters who aren't prepared for high-level submission grappling.
Grip Inversion Strategy - Unlike most grapplers who fight for their own grips, Mesquita lets you grip her and then exploits your commitment to those grips. This creates submission opportunities that opponents don't see coming because they think they're in control.
Gift Wrap to Back Take - Against Alekseeva, she passed her opponent's arm across the body, secured it behind the head, and used that control to force the back exposure. The rear naked choke followed shortly after. This technique limits defensive options and encourages opponents to turn, which is exactly what Alekseeva did.
Her stats tell the story: 2.07 submissions per fight and 4.15 takedowns per fight. She's landing 66.7% of her takedown attempts and has never been taken down in the UFC. The striking numbers are secondary here. She landed nearly 5 significant strikes per minute against Alekseeva, but the fight was always heading to the mat.
Technical Evolution:
Mesquita is adapting her pure grappling game for MMA. The gift wrap technique, historically associated with gi grappling through Rickson Gracie, has been modernized for no-gi by Gordon Ryan. She's applying these concepts effectively in the cage. Her transition from ADCC to MMA appears seamless so far.
Untested Against Elite MMA Grapplers - Her UFC win came against Alekseeva, who was on a three-fight losing streak. That was described as a "squash match." We haven't seen how her unorthodox submission game translates against someone with genuine MMA grappling awareness and defensive wrestling.
Competition Level Ceiling - She lost her last two ADCC matches to Ffion Davies before transitioning to MMA. This suggests she may have hit her ceiling at the highest levels of pure grappling. Whether this matters in MMA remains to be seen.
Striking Development Unknown - Her striking hasn't been tested. She absorbed strikes at a low rate against Alekseeva, but that fight went to the ground quickly. Against someone who can keep distance or stuff takedowns, her feet game becomes relevant.
Rendon comes in at 7-1 overall and 2-1 in the UFC. Her most recent win over Alice Pereira was a split decision, and her lone UFC loss came via unanimous decision to Daria Zhelezniakova in March 2024.
Signature Techniques:
The available data shows Rendon as a volume fighter who attempts a lot of takedowns (5.33 per fight) but converts at just 37.5%. Her recent takedown accuracy has improved to 55.75%, suggesting some technical refinement. She lands 2.11 head strikes per minute and throws a decent amount of leg kicks at 0.51 per minute.
Her striking accuracy sits at 28% for significant strikes, which is low. She's throwing a lot but not landing clean. Against Vidal and Pereira, she won split decisions, meaning these fights were close and competitive rather than dominant performances.
Technical Evolution:
Recent numbers show improvement in takedown accuracy and overall striking output differential. Her recent average striking output differential jumped to 76.27 from 52.0 career average. She's becoming more active, but the accuracy issues persist.
Low Striking Accuracy - At 28% significant striking accuracy, Rendon is missing far more than she's landing. This creates opportunities for counters and allows opponents to time her entries. Both her split decision wins suggest she's not landing clean enough to dominate rounds.
Negative Significant Striking Impact Differential - Her career significant striking impact differential is -5.0, meaning opponents are landing more meaningful shots than she is. This is a bad sign against anyone with decent hands, let alone someone who will drag you to the mat.
Takedown Conversion Issues - Attempting 5.33 takedowns per fight but landing only 37.5% means she's burning energy on failed shots. Against an elite grappler like Mesquita, failed takedown attempts could lead to scrambles that favor the ADCC veteran.
This matchup heavily favors Mesquita's grappling. Rendon attempts takedowns frequently but doesn't finish them at a high rate. Against Mesquita, any grappling exchange is dangerous territory.
Mesquita's weapons vs Rendon's gaps: - Mesquita's reactive guard game exploits opponents who hand fight and grip. Rendon's grappling approach likely involves exactly this kind of engagement. - The gift wrap to back take sequence works against fighters who don't understand the positional danger. Rendon hasn't shown high-level submission defense. - Mesquita's 100% takedown defense means Rendon's primary path to victory (grinding out decisions via control) is blocked.
Rendon's weapons vs Mesquita's gaps: - Rendon's volume striking could theoretically keep Mesquita at range, but her 28% accuracy makes this unlikely. - Leg kicks at 0.51 per minute could slow Mesquita's entries, but the rate isn't high enough to be a real deterrent.
The historical comparison here is Mackenzie Dern against lower-level opposition. When elite grapplers face fighters without submission awareness, the skill gap becomes obvious quickly.
Early Rounds: Mesquita will look to close distance and initiate grappling immediately. Her 66.7% takedown accuracy against Rendon's 100% takedown defense ratio creates an interesting dynamic, but Mesquita's entries are likely more sophisticated. Expect Mesquita to secure a takedown or clinch position within the first two minutes.
Mid-Fight Adjustments: If Rendon survives early grappling exchanges, she'll need to establish range with her jab and leg kicks. But her low accuracy makes this difficult. Mesquita showed against Alekseeva that once she gets top position or back control, the finish comes quickly.
Championship Rounds: This fight is unlikely to see round three. Mesquita's submission rate and Rendon's lack of elite defensive grappling suggest an early finish.
The SHAP data shows what's driving this prediction:
The only negative factor was Striking Defense Percentage, which decreased the score by 1.0. Mesquita's 50% striking defense is lower than Rendon's 54.35%, but this is largely irrelevant given the grappling disparity.
WolfTicketsAI has no prediction history for either fighter. This is Mesquita's second UFC fight and the model hasn't previously picked her. Rendon's fights also lack prediction data.
This creates some uncertainty, but the statistical advantages are so clear that the lack of historical model performance shouldn't concern you much.
This is a stylistic nightmare for Montse Rendon. She's facing an elite submission artist with world-class credentials, and her path to victory requires winning a striking battle with 28% accuracy or surviving grappling exchanges against someone who finished opponents at ADCC. Neither seems likely.
WolfTicketsAI has Mesquita winning this fight, and the data supports that conclusion. Expect Mesquita to secure a takedown, advance to a dominant position, and finish via submission. The only question is how long Rendon can delay the inevitable.
| Stat | Bia Mesquita | Montse Rendon | Weight Class Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Stats | ||||
| Age | 34 | 36 | 33 | |
| Height | 64" | 68" | 67" | |
| Reach | 67" | 68" | 68" | |
| Win Percentage | 100.00% | 87.50% | 77.05% | |
| Wins | 7 | 7 | ||
| Losses | 0 | 2 | ||
| Wins at Weight Class | 1 | 2 | ||
| Losses at Weight Class | 0 | 1 | ||
| Striking Stats | ||||
| Striking Accuracy | 62.24% | 34.42% | 49.62% | |
| Significant Striking Accuracy | 57.14% | 28.08% | 42.70% | |
| Strikes Landed Per Minute | 8.433 | 4.444 | 5.471 | |
| Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute | 4.977 | 3.089 | 3.507 | |
| Knockdowns per Fight | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.165 | |
| Striking Impact Differential | 44.00% | 2.00% | 8.72% | |
| Significant Striking Impact Differential | 30.00% | -5.00% | 7.53% | |
| Striking Output Differential | 64.00% | 52.00% | 8.96% | |
| Significant Striking Output Differential | 40.00% | 39.67% | 7.64% | |
| Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 27.87% | 115.50% | 68.37% | |
| Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 47.22% | 159.71% | 89.92% | |
| Striking Defense Percentage | 73.91% | 59.04% | 46.64% | |
| Takedown and Submission Stats | ||||
| Submissions per Fight | 2.074 | 0.333 | 0.231 | |
| Takedowns per Fight | 4.148 | 2.000 | 0.981 | |
| Takedowns Attempted per Fight | 6.221 | 5.333 | 2.654 | |
| Takedown Defense | 100.00% | 100.00% | 75.31% | |
| Takedown Accuracy | 66.67% | 37.50% | 27.64% | |
| Head Stats | ||||
| Head Strikes Landed per Minute | 4.839 | 2.111 | 1.955 | |
| Head Strikes Attempted per Minute | 8.571 | 9.289 | 5.112 | |
| Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.415 | 1.822 | 1.831 | |
| Body Stats | ||||
| Body Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.000 | 0.467 | 0.827 | |
| Body Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.000 | 0.956 | 1.155 | |
| Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.000 | 0.689 | 0.674 | |
| Leg Stats | ||||
| Leg Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.138 | 0.511 | 0.726 | |
| Leg kicks Attempted per Minute | 0.138 | 0.756 | 0.901 | |
| Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute | 0.415 | 0.911 | 0.518 | |
| Clinch Stats | ||||
| Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.000 | 0.067 | 0.548 | |
| Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.000 | 0.289 | 0.753 | |
| Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.000 | 0.178 | 0.406 | |
| Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct. 11, 2025 | Women's Bantamweight | Bia Mesquita | Irina Alekseeva | Bia Mesquita |
| Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sept. 13, 2025 | Women's Bantamweight | Montse Rendon | Alice Pereira | Montse Rendon | |
| March 23, 2024 | Women's Bantamweight | Montse Rendon | Daria Zhelezniakova | Daria Zhelezniakova | |
| Sept. 23, 2023 | Women's Bantamweight | Tamires Vidal | Montse Rendon | Montse Rendon |