WTAI Model | Profit Model | Plain Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full | Main | Under | Full | Main | Under | Full |
60.0% | 75.0% | 66.67% | 80.0% | 75.0% | 77.78% | 40.0% | 25.0% | 33.33% |
WTAI Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
60.0% | 75.0% | 66.67% |
Profit Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
80.0% | 75.0% | 77.78% |
Plain Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
40.0% | 25.0% | 33.33% |
The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Score: 15 Odds: Mackenzie Dern: 160 Amanda Ribas: -225
Mackenzie Dern is a highly skilled grappler known for her fluid Brazilian jiu-jitsu game. She excels at sweeping opponents and advancing position quickly on the ground to set up submissions like armbars and rear-naked chokes. In her recent win over Angela Hill, Dern showcased improved striking to complement her elite ground skills. She came out aggressively, throwing heavy overhand rights and crisp leg kicks to keep Hill off balance.
However, Dern's biggest weakness remains her wrestling. She has difficulty getting fights to the mat consistently due to her limited takedown abilities. While crafty at pulling guard, this is a less effective approach at the highest levels. Dern is also somewhat hittable on the feet due to defensive lapses and below average hand speed.
Amanda Ribas is an extremely well-rounded fighter who seamlessly mixes together striking and grappling. On the feet, she utilizes precise jabs and hard low kicks to maintain range. Ribas has a strong clinch game, parlaying her opponents' pressure into judo throws and trips.
Once on the ground, Ribas is a serious submission threat with black belts in both judo and Brazilian jiu-jitsu. She flows fluidly between positions and is adept at taking the back. Ribas also has underrated wrestling, chaining together level changes into double leg takedowns, especially when she has opponents near the fence.
Ribas's recent loss to Maycee Barber exposed some potential holes in her striking defense, as she was caught by a well-timed rear straight and head kick combo. However, Ribas has historically been quite durable.
WolfTicketsAI favors Amanda Ribas in this matchup for the following reasons:
WolfTicketsAI has had mixed results predicting these two fighters:
All things considered, Amanda Ribas appears to be a justifiable favorite over Mackenzie Dern. Her striking advantage on the feet and superior wrestling give her more paths to victory. Unless Dern can consistently take Ribas down and keep her there, Ribas's more complete skill set should win out over five rounds. However, Dern is always live for a submission if she can get it to the mat. This should be a fascinating clash of elite grapplers, but the pick is Amanda Ribas to get her hand raised.
Score: 2 Odds: Santiago Ponzinibbio: -111 Carlston Harris: -115
Santiago Ponzinibbio is a seasoned UFC welterweight known for his aggressive striking style. He utilizes precise jabbing and powerful hooks to pick apart his opponents from range before closing the distance with flurries of punches. His background in kickboxing and boxing is evident in his accurate striking, boasting a 42% significant strike accuracy.
In his last fight against Michel Pereira, Ponzinibbio struggled with the unorthodox movement and creative striking of his opponent, losing a close split decision. Prior to that he scored an impressive KO win over Alex Morono, landing a crushing overhand right to secure the finish in round 3. This showcased his one-punch knockout power.
Ponzinibbio will likely look to utilize his jab and low kicks to control range against Harris and limit his wrestling entries. If he can stuff the takedowns and keep it standing, his higher volume striking attack should give him the edge. However, he can be susceptible to being controlled against the fence if his opponents are able to close the distance on him.
Carlston Harris is a versatile fighter who combines solid striking fundamentals with high-level grappling. He is especially dangerous with chokes, securing 6 of his 19 pro wins by submission. In the UFC, he has shown a diverse submission arsenal with wins by arm triangle, anaconda choke, and rear-naked choke.
Harris is coming off a submission loss to top prospect Jeremiah Wells in his last bout. He was able to secure a few takedowns early but struggled to maintain control, eventually getting caught in an anaconda choke in round 3. Prior to that he had won 4 straight, including an impressive 1st round submission over Impa Kasanganay.
For Harris, the key to victory will be using his wrestling to take Ponzinibbio down and work towards dominant positions. He has solid striking but tends to be more effective when he can mix in his grappling. Look for Harris to close distance, get underhooks against the cage, and drag Ponzinibbio to the mat where he can hunt for submissions. Ponzinibbio has solid takedown defense at 67% though, so Harris will need to be persistent with his wrestling.
Here are the key factors from the SHAP data that support Ponzinibbio winning:
Odds: The odds of -111 for Ponzinibbio indicate the betting market favoring him over Harris. This increased the model score by 5 points.
Striking Defense Percentage: Ponzinibbio's strike defense of 59.8% is very solid and 18 points higher than Harris's at 40.6%. Avoiding damage will be key for Ponzinibbio and this increased the score by 3 points.
Win Streak Difference: Ponzinibbio has won 2 of his last 3 fights, while Harris has lost 2 of his last 3. Momentum seems to favor Ponzinibbio and this increased the score by 1 point.
The one concerning factor for Ponzinibbio is the recent win percentage, which decreased his score by 3 points. At just 33% in his last 3 fights compared to 67% for Harris, the model sees some vulnerability there.
Overall though, the betting odds, striking metrics, and win streak point to Ponzinibbio being a moderate favorite in what should be a competitive fight.
This will be the 5th time WolfTickets has predicted a Santiago Ponzinibbio fight. It has a 2-2 record so far: - Correctly predicted Kevin Holland to beat Ponzinibbio - Correctly predicted Ponzinibbio to beat Alex Morono - Incorrectly picked Ponzinibbio to beat Michel Pereira - Incorrectly picked Muslim Salikhov to beat Ponzinibbio
For Carlston Harris, the model is 2-1 in 3 predictions: - Correctly predicted Khaos Williams to beat Harris - Correctly predicted Shavkat Rakhmonov to beat Harris - Incorrectly picked Jeremiah Wells to beat Harris
So in both cases, the model has been reasonably accurate but shows vulnerability to upset losses for the favored fighter. This adds some uncertainty to the Ponzinibbio prediction.
In what looks to be an entertaining clash of styles, I believe Santiago Ponzinibbio's precise striking and takedown defense will be enough to earn him a decision victory over Carlston Harris. Ponzinibbio's jab, low kicks, and power punching should allow him to control the striking exchanges if he can keep this fight standing.
Harris will have his moments if he can get Ponzinibbio down and maintain control. His submission skills are very dangerous. But Ponzinibbio is an underrated grappler in his own right and I expect him to be able to survive on the ground and force Harris to work hard for any submissions.
This will likely be a back-and-forth fight that goes to the judges, but I predict Ponzinibbio to get his hand raised for a close decision win.
Score: 18 Odds: Cesar Almeida: -290 Abdul Razak Alhassan: +215
Coming from a kickboxing background with 47 wins and 27 knockouts, Almeida brings high-level striking to the octagon. His UFC run shows mixed success, going 2-1 with his most recent win being a unanimous decision over Ihor Potieria. Despite winning on the scorecards, that fight exposed some concerning holes in Almeida's takedown defense and cardio management.
While training at the UFC Performance Institute under Matheus Naccache, Almeida has developed a sophisticated striking game. He lands an impressive 7.5 strikes per minute with a 69% accuracy rate. His defense needs work though, only blocking 39% of incoming strikes. The stats show he prefers to keep fights standing, having attempted less than one takedown per fight.
Alhassan brings explosive power and a high finishing rate to this matchup. His UFC career shows a clear pattern - when he can land early, he's devastating, scoring 1.43 knockdowns per fight. However, his recent performances raise red flags, going 1-4 in his last 5 UFC appearances. The stats reveal his strike accuracy has dropped to 48% recently, down from his career 53%.
His last fight ended in controversy against Cody Brundage with illegal blows, but before that he suffered a submission loss to Joe Pyfer that highlighted his vulnerability on the ground. Alhassan tends to fade after the first round if he can't get the finish, a pattern that's become more pronounced in recent fights.
WolfTicketsAI has predicted two of Almeida's three UFC fights, going 1-1. The correct prediction came in his most recent bout against Potieria with a strong 0.72 confidence score.
For Alhassan, the model has predicted three fights, correctly calling his losses to Pyfer and Buckley. However, it missed on the Brundage fight that ended in a no contest. The model's track record suggests more reliability when predicting against Alhassan.
The data points to Almeida's technical striking and recent form being the deciding factors. While both fighters have defensive gaps, Almeida's higher output and more diverse striking arsenal should allow him to control the distance and pace. Alhassan's declining performance and tendency to fade after round one make him vulnerable to Almeida's methodical approach. Unless Alhassan can land something significant early, Almeida's advantages in technique and output should carry him to victory.
Score: 18 Odds: Chris Curtis: +205 Roman Kopylov: -265
Curtis brings a patient counter-striking style to the octagon, working behind a high guard and calculated shoulder roll defense. His recent split decision victory over Marc-Andre Barriault showcased his ability to land crisp combinations, though his output has dropped in recent fights. The data shows Curtis landing 5.61 significant strikes per minute with a 51% striking accuracy, but his recent performances indicate a concerning trend - dropping three of his last five bouts.
His fight against Brendan Allen highlighted vulnerabilities when pressured by fighters who mix up their attacks. While Curtis can stuff takedowns effectively, his tendency to shell up against the cage leaves openings for body shots and leg kicks, weapons that Kopylov has shown proficiency with.
Kopylov enters this bout riding serious momentum with four finishes in his last six fights. His technical striking arsenal features devastating liver shots and head kicks, demonstrated perfectly in his KO victory over Josh Fremd. Kopylov's statistical edge shows in his 4.32 significant strikes landed per minute with a 54% accuracy rate.
His recent loss to Anthony Hernandez came via submission, but before that he was on a four-fight win streak with three KO/TKO finishes. Kopylov's ability to manage distance through feints and angle changes makes him particularly dangerous in the pocket, where he's shown excellent ability to chain together combinations.
The model has correctly predicted two of Kopylov's last three fights, including his win over Josh Fremd and loss to Anthony Hernandez. However, its track record with Curtis has been less reliable, incorrectly predicting four of his last six outcomes. This inconsistency in predicting Curtis's fights adds some uncertainty to the current prediction.
The technical matchup favors Kopylov's more diverse striking arsenal and momentum, though the significant odds impact on the model suggests some caution. His ability to attack the body while Curtis shells up, combined with superior defensive statistics, presents a clear path to victory. While Curtis remains dangerous with his counter-striking, his recent performances and stylistic matchup challenges make Kopylov the justified favorite.
Score: 13 Odds: Punahele Soriano: 162 Uros Medic: -210
Punahele Soriano is known for his powerful striking, especially his left hand. In his recent win against Miguel Baeza, he showcased improved wrestling to complement his striking. Soriano was able to stuff Baeza's leg lock attempts and use top control to land ground-and-pound, similar to Dustin Poirier's style of integrating wrestling with striking.
However, Soriano has shown vulnerability to losing by submission, like in his recent loss to Dustin Stoltzfus. He made the mistake of not capitalizing fully on takedowns, allowing Stoltzfus opportunities to secure the choke in round 2. Soriano's aggressive pursuit of the knockout can also leave him open to counters, as seen in his KO loss to Roman Kopylov.
While Soriano has knockout power, his single-minded approach and cardio issues have been exploited by tactical strikers like Kopylov who damaged him with body shots and leg kicks while Soriano telegraphed the overhand left. Overall, Soriano is dangerous early but can fade if forced into later rounds. He's lost his last 2 out of 3 fights.
Uros "The Doctor" Medic is a precise, technical striker with a strong finishing instinct, securing 6 first-round finishes in his career. In his recent knockout of veteran Tim Means, Medic weathered early clinch attempts to land a snapping left uppercut that crumbled Means.
Medic's striking is marked by adaptability. Against Matthew Semelsberger, he adjusted to an aggressive pace, using clinch work to negate takedowns and tee off with power shots to secure a 3rd round KO. Even in his submission loss to grappler Myktybek Orolbai, Medic showed solid takedown defense and landed strikes before getting caught.
A southpaw kickboxer, Medic utilizes a diverse arsenal of jabs, crosses, uppercuts, hooks and kicks with technical mastery. His precision (58% significant strike accuracy), power (1.99 knockdowns/fight) and killer instinct make him a perpetual finish threat. Though not a grappler by trade, Medic's 80% takedown defense allows him to keep fights standing and pick apart opponents with surgical strikes.
Clash of Styles: This is a classic matchup of an aggressive knockout artist in Soriano vs a precise, technical striker in Medic. Soriano will headhunt with powerful hooks while Medic looks to dissect him with a varied attack.
Early Danger: Soriano is most threatening in round 1 before his cardio declines. Medic needs to weather the early storm and look to punish Soriano with counters and body work as he fades.
Paths to Victory: For Medic, striking defense and cardio are key. He must avoid Soriano's kill shots early, exploit openings as they emerge, and drown him with volume. For Soriano, it's vital to cut off the cage, unload early, and pursue the finish before gassing out. Wrestling could also help him slow Medic down.
The model favors Uros Medic primarily due to his:
Striking Impact Differential (+10.0): Medic significantly outpaces opponents in strike impact, similar to his advantage over Soriano (+10.125). This metric evaluates relative impact of strikes landed vs absorbed.
Recent Striking Accuracy (66%): Medic's accuracy has improved in recent fights and far exceeds Soriano's 51%, indicating a technical edge that may amplify his impact advantage.
Striking Output Differential (+5.83): Medic maintains a higher offensive pace relative to opponents than Soriano does (+4.17), an advantage that is even larger in sig. strikes (+4.16 vs +0.01 for Soriano).
Soriano's declining Recent Win Percentage (33%) and odds (+162) further tilt the scales toward Medic, who is the betting favorite (-210). However, the fight is still quite competitive, as Soriano's sig. strike impact differential is similar to Medic's (+10.5) and he has the striking power to claim victory with one punch.
The WolfTicketsAI model has had mixed results predicting these fighters:
For Punahele Soriano, the model has correctly picked him to lose his last 3 fights with confidences of 65-71%. However, it wrongly favored him over Miguel Baeza recently.
For Uros Medic, the model has been exactly 50/50, correctly backing him over Semelsberger but wrongly picking Morales to defeat him. No data exists on the Means fight.
Given the model's recent accuracy on Soriano fights, there is good reason to trust the Medic prediction here. However, the small sample sizes preclude great confidence.
Uros Medic's precise, varied striking and superior cardio make him a solid pick to outpoint Punahele Soriano over 3 rounds or possibly find a late finish. While Soriano has clear paths to an early knockout, his fading endurance and predictability make him less likely to execute as the fight goes longer.
Medic's more complete skill set, 5-inch reach advantage, and strong takedown defense should allow him to set the terms of the fight, though he must still survive Soriano's early onslaught. Considering the model's solid recent record on Soriano bouts, this shapes up as a reasonably safe bet on the well-rounded "Doctor."
Score: 18 Odds: Jose Johnson: -210 Felipe Bunes: +162
Jose Johnson is a dynamic striker with a deep understanding of Muay Thai. His aggressive fighting style focuses on high-paced striking and decent submission skills. Johnson's ability to switch between orthodox and southpaw stances makes him unpredictable and difficult to game plan against.
In his UFC debut against Da'Mon Blackshear, Johnson was caught in a rare twister submission in the first round. However, he showed significant improvement in his next fight against Chad Anheliger, dominating the striking exchanges and securing a rear-naked choke submission victory in the third round. This highlights Johnson's ability to learn and adapt from previous experiences.
Johnson's striking speed and accuracy allow him to control the distance and pace of the fight. His calculated footwork helps him avoid takedowns and create counterattacking opportunities. While he fell short against Asu Almabayev's superior grappling in his most recent bout, Johnson's 11:24 of control time against a wrestler of Almabayev's caliber is noteworthy.
To beat Johnson, opponents should look to exploit his grappling by attempting takedowns and controlling positions on the ground. Pushing a high pace could also potentially tire Johnson out in later rounds, though his exceptional cardio makes this a tall task. Overall, Johnson's dynamic skillset and fight IQ make him a challenging opponent for anyone in the division.
Felipe Bunes is a well-rounded fighter known for his technical submission skills and versatile grappling. He uses precise striking to set up strong takedowns, often utilizing techniques like the crack back single leg to gain advantageous positions.
In his most recent fight against Joshua Van, Bunes effectively used right straights and knees to punish Van's level changes. However, after a strong start, Bunes faded as the fight progressed, allowing Van's relentless pressure to overwhelm him. This tendency to slow down in later rounds is a significant vulnerability in Bunes' game.
To defeat Bunes, opponents should focus on weathering his early storm and dragging him into deep waters. Maintaining a high pace, utilizing body attacks, and exploiting Bunes' fading cardio could be paths to victory. Bunes would benefit from improving his conditioning and pacing himself better to maintain performance throughout the fight.
Striking vs Grappling: This matchup pits Johnson's high-level striking against Bunes' submission-heavy grappling game. Whoever can implement their preferred style will have a significant advantage.
Cardio Concerns: Both fighters have shown vulnerabilities in their gas tanks. Johnson struggled in later rounds against Almabayev's grappling pressure, while Bunes faded badly against Van's volume striking. The fighter who manages their energy better will be well-positioned to win.
Wrestling as X-Factor: Bunes' strong wrestling could be key in neutralizing Johnson's dangerous striking. If Bunes can consistently take Johnson down and control him on the mat, it would take Johnson's biggest weapons out of the equation.
Recent Losses: Both men are coming off losses and will be hungry to rebound. The mental aspect could come into play, especially if the fight starts badly for either fighter.
Odds: The betting odds favor Johnson at -210, increasing the model's score by 8 points. The odds reflect Johnson's striking prowess and overall skill level.
Striking Output: Johnson is predicted to have a slight edge in striking output and impact, raising the score by 7 points. His speed and diverse striking could help him outland Bunes.
Grappling Stats: Bunes' strong takedown game decreased the score by 2 points. His 9.46 takedowns attempted per fight and 3.15 takedowns landed per fight are significantly higher than Johnson's and could be a path to victory.
Recent Performances: Johnson's recent loss decreased the score by 2 points compared to Bunes. However, the model still favors Johnson's overall body of work.
The model does not have a prediction history for Bunes, which adds uncertainty to the pick. More data would increase confidence.
For Johnson, the model has gone 2-0, correctly picking him to beat Anheliger and lose to Almabayev. This suggests the model has a decent understanding of Johnson's skills and vulnerabilities.
The lack of data on Bunes and Johnson's limited UFC sample size (3 fights) are factors to consider when assessing this prediction.
WolfTicketsAI predicts Jose Johnson to defeat Felipe Bunes, Johnson's dynamic striking and strong takedown defense are expected to be the difference-makers. However, Bunes' grappling-heavy style and the cardio questions surrounding both fighters add intrigue to this matchup. This shapes up as a competitive, high-stakes battle between two skilled flyweights looking to make a statement.
Score: 0.0 Odds: Thiago Moises: -210 Trey Ogden: 162
Thiago Moises is a skilled and dynamic lightweight fighter known for his well-rounded game. With a black belt in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Moises has demonstrated impressive grappling skills, securing 7 of his 18 career wins by submission. He can smoothly transition from striking to clinch work to wrestling exchanges.
On the feet, Moises utilizes crisp muay thai striking with hard kicks and punches. He maintains a high striking pace, landing 3.07 significant strikes per minute in the UFC. Moises is durable too, absorbing just 3.53 strikes per minute.
Moises will likely look to close the distance, push Ogden against the cage, and either work for takedowns or land knees and elbows in the clinch. Once on the mat, expect him to hunt for submissions from dominant positions. In his last fight, Moises used an opportunistic inside trip to get Ludovit Klein to the canvas where he established back control.
However, Moises is coming off a tough KO loss to Benoit Saint Denis in his previous outing. Getting finished so definitively could impact his confidence stepping into this bout. His takedown defense of 51% is also somewhat concerning.
Trey Ogden is primarily a grappler who uses wrestling to control fights. He averages an impressive 2.04 takedowns per 15 minutes in the UFC while defending 100% of his opponents' takedown attempts.
Once Ogden gets the fight to the mat, he is very effective at maintaining top position and racking up control time. In his last win over Kurt Holobaugh, Ogden secured 3 takedowns and amassed over 11 minutes of control. He landed frequent ground strikes throughout to seal the unanimous decision.
On the feet, Ogden has serviceable striking but it's not his strong suit. He absorbs more significant strikes than he lands per minute. His 47% striking defense is worrisome, especially against a muay thai specialist like Moises.
The big question is whether Ogden can consistently take Moises down. In Ogden's loss to Ignacio Bahamondes, he struggled to get the fight to the floor and ended up losing a clear-cut decision on the feet. He'll need to mind Moises' submissions if he does get top position.
WolfTickets predicts a Moises win, but only with a score of 0.0. Key factors:
In Moises's last 3 fights, WolfTickets correctly predicted his wins over Mitch Ramirez and Christos Giagos but also correctly predicted his KO loss to Benoit Saint Denis.
For Ogden's last 3 fights, WolfTickets was correct in predicting his win over Kurt Holobaugh, but incorrectly picked him to beat Loik Radzhabov and Nikolas Motta (overturned).
So while the model has a decent recent track record for both fighters, the incorrect picks introduce some uncertainty, especially with how close it sees this matchup.
Ultimately, this fight will likely hinge on where it takes place. Moises has the edge if he can keep it standing and let his striking shine. But if Ogden can impose his wrestling as he often does, he could grind out a decision.
The odds and striking numbers favor Moises by a hair, aligning with WolfTickets' 0.0 score prediction. But Ogden's grappling definitely makes him live. This one is a true pick'em with upset potential.
Score: 20 Odds: Fatima Kline: -860 Viktoriia Dudakova: 500
Fatima "The Archangel" Kline is an up-and-coming flyweight prospect known for her well-rounded skill set. With a background in jiu-jitsu that she started training at age 10, Kline has seamlessly integrated striking into her game to become a formidable threat both on the mat and standing.
In her most recent fight against Jasmine Jasudavicius, Kline showcased solid grappling, landing a takedown and defending well against Jasudavicius's attacks. While she ultimately lost a unanimous decision, the loss highlighted areas Kline can shore up, namely her striking output and ability to maintain a high pace for three full rounds.
At just 20 years old when she turned pro, Kline's ceiling remains high. Training at top-tier gyms like MK Muay Thai, Cordoba Wrestling Club and Silver Fox Jiu-Jitsu has equipped her with the technical tools to compete with the division's best. Look for Kline to lean on her grappling early to test Dudakova's takedown defense.
A talented prospect out of Russia, Viktoriia Dudakova brings an aggressive, well-rounded game built on a foundation of powerful striking and opportunistic grappling. "The Fury" pushes a relentless pace from the opening bell, overwhelming opponents with forward pressure and a diverse arsenal of attacks.
In her UFC debut against Istela Nunes, Dudakova's aggressiveness led to a freak injury for Nunes just 34 seconds into the fight. While an unfortunate ending, it highlighted Dudakova's ability to force the action and capitalize on openings. She followed that up with a unanimous decision over veteran Jinh Yu Frey, though she missed weight, indicating potential issues with her weight cut.
Most recently, Dudakova dropped a split decision to Sam Hughes in a back-and-forth battle. After starting strong with her powerful right hand and knees in the clinch, Dudakova faded late as Hughes rallied. The loss exposed a potential weakness in Dudakova's gas tank that opponents may look to exploit by dragging her into the later rounds.
The model favors Fatima Kline to get the win here, and the odds reflect that, pegging her as a sizable favorite. Several factors are tipping the scales for Kline:
That said, Dudakova has some key advantages of her own: - Striking output: Dudakova tends to throw in higher volume, both in terms of overall and significant strikes landed per minute. If she can keep the fight standing, she could outland Kline over 15 minutes. - One-shot power: Dudakova's high knockdown rate indicates real fight-ending power in her hands. One clean shot could end Kline's night early.
WolfTicketsAI has no recorded past predictions for Fatima Kline.
For Viktoriia Dudakova, the model has a mixed track record: - Correctly predicted her win over Jinh Yu Frey with high confidence - Incorrectly picked her to beat Sam Hughes in a close fight
The limited prediction history adds uncertainty to this pick. With such a small sample size to gauge the model's performance, bettors should proceed with added caution, especially given the wide odds.
All in all, WolfTicketsAI projects Fatima Kline to emerge victorious over Viktoriia Dudakova, likely on the strength of her grappling superiority and slight striking advantages. However, Dudakova's power striking and aggressive style make her a live underdog capable of scoring the upset if she can land a fight-changing blow.
Given the lack of a substantial track record predicting these fighters, this shapes up as a potentially risky bet, despite what the odds suggest. Trend carefully and keep the stakes reasonable with this one. An evenly-matched scrap between two exciting up-and-comers awaits.
Score: 6
Odds:
Nurullo Aliev: 340
Yanal Ashmouz: -500
Nurullo Aliev, the first Tajikistani UFC fighter, has an aggressive, relentless style characterized by pushing opponents against the cage and wearing them down with constant pressure. In his debut win over Rafael Alves, he effectively used overhooks and head pressure to nullify Alves' striking and takedowns. Aliev's constant forward movement and gritty clinchwork draw comparisons to pressure fighters like Khabib Nurmagomedov and Colby Covington.
However, Aliev's aggressive pursuit can leave him vulnerable to counters, which Alves exploited at times. Future opponents should aim to capitalize on moments when Aliev overextends. While he adapted well against Alves by mixing in takedowns, his ability to maintain a high pace deep into fights remains to be seen.
With only one UFC bout, questions remain about how Aliev's pressure-heavy approach will fare against more experienced, well-rounded opponents. But his successful debut showed promise that his physical style can translate to UFC success.
Yanal Ashmouz is a well-rounded fighter who excels at controlling fights with wrestling and measured striking. In his last win over Trevor Peek, he utilized superior grappling to rack up over 8 minutes of control time. When Peek got aggressive, Ashmouz capitalized with perfectly timed takedowns.
On the feet, Ashmouz has solid defense, deflecting 59% of Peek's significant strikes. He picks his shots well, landing stinging punches when opportunities arise without overextending himself. His clinch striking is also effective.
A previous loss to Chris Duncan showed some potential weaknesses. Duncan's pressure striking overwhelmed Ashmouz early before he could implement his grappling. Ashmouz was resilient though, rallying with takedowns and nearly stealing the fight. This shows he can be beaten to the punch by a quick starter, but is adaptable and dangerous even when hurt.
Stylistic Matchup: This shapes up as a classic grappler vs pressure fighter matchup. Aliev will look to bull forward and grind Ashmouz against the cage, while Ashmouz wants to maintain distance, pick shots, and reactive wrestle.
Early Exchanges Critical: Whoever can impose their preferred pace and range in the first round will have a huge advantage. Can Aliev immediately back Ashmouz up or will Ashmouz establish his jab and low kicks?
Clinch Battles: Much of the fight could take place in the clinch, given both men's strengths there. Ashmouz has technical trips and throws, but can he hit those against Aliev's sheer physical pressure?
Cardio a Potential Factor: Aliev's nonstop style requires immense cardio, something not yet tested in the UFC. If he slows even slightly, Ashmouz can take over with his more measured approach.
Adaptability : Both have shown ability to adjust mid-fight. That in-the-moment tactical acumen and resilience could be the difference maker if the initial game plans stall out.
Striking Impact Differential: This heavily favors Aliev at 67.0000 vs -5.3333 for Ashmouz. Not surprising given the former's pressure style and higher striking output. Swings the odds in his favor.
Grappling Stats: On takedowns per fight and takedown accuracy, Ashmouz holds a slight edge. He lands 4.8 takedowns at 50%, compared to Aliev's 3 at 75%. This explains why the model isn't even more bullish on Aliev given the striking disparity.
Overall Winning Records: Both fighters have stellar winning percentages - Aliev is undefeated at 9-0 while Ashmouz is 8-1. The model sees them as closely matched in overall skill but gives Aliev the nod based on his specific statistical advantages.
WolfTicketsAI is 1-1 in predicting Ashmouz's previous fights, correctly calling the Duncan loss but missing the Peek win. The model has no data on its past performance with Aliev.
This limited data means the prediction carries some uncertainty. More past results would lend extra confidence to the pick. As is, the model sees Aliev as a solid but not overwhelming favorite.
In a matchup of two talented prospects, WolfTicketsAI projects Nurullo Aliev to defeat Yanal Ashmouz, outpointing him in a grueling physical affair. The pick hinges on Aliev's relentless pressure being too much for Ashmouz's more nuanced approach.
However, Ashmouz's own grappling skills and ability to make tactical adjustments means an upset would hardly be shocking. He has multiple paths to victory if he can weather Aliev's early storm and turn the tables with timely takedowns.