The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Basic Prediction
This prediction was made before July 20th, 2024 and does not include detailed insights.
Score: 3 Odds: Norma Dumont: -180 Germaine de Randamie: 150
Norma Dumont is known for her strategic and methodical approach in the octagon. She excels at controlling the pace of the fight, picking her moments to engage with explosive attacks. With a solid boxing foundation, Dumont maintains composure under pressure and executes her game plan effectively.
While she hasn't always secured finishes, her adaptability has allowed her to incorporate more grappling and clinch work into her arsenal. This was evident in her recent unanimous decision victory over Chelsea Chandler, where Dumont utilized her jab to control range and landed significant strikes to make Chandler retreat.
Dumont's striking accuracy (60.39%) and significant striking accuracy (49.94%) demonstrate her precision on the feet. She lands 3.41 significant strikes per minute while absorbing 2.27, giving her a positive significant striking differential. Her striking defense (45.33%) has room for improvement, but her ability to outland opponents has been key to her success.
With a 83.33% win rate and coming off a string of victories, Dumont's confidence will be high heading into this matchup. Look for her to employ a similar game plan as she did against Chandler, using her technical boxing to control range and tempo while mixing in strategic grappling exchanges.
Germaine de Randamie is a seasoned striker with knockout power. She has finished 27.67% of her fights by KO/TKO and also shown submission skills, winning 41.51% of her bouts by submission. De Randamie is comfortable keeping fights standing, where she can utilize her 71-inch reach and diverse kickboxing arsenal.
De Randamie lands 2.78 significant strikes per minute while absorbing 1.62, showing a solid striking differential. Her significant striking accuracy is 48.01%, but her defense is where she shines, successfully defending 64.84% of significant strikes. This defensive prowess allows her to avoid damage and maintain her rhythm in striking exchanges.
However, de Randamie's takedown defense is a potential area of concern. She defends only 37.84% of takedown attempts, which could be problematic against a strategically grappling opponent. While she has a dangerous clinch striking game, landing 1.01 strikes per minute in the clinch, her takedown vulnerability is something to monitor.
De Randamie is coming off a submission win over Julianna Pena, showcasing her evolving ground skills. But prior to that, she suffered decision losses to top-tier competition in Amanda Nunes and Holly Holm. At 37 years old, it will be interesting to see if de Randamie can turn back the clock and recapture the form that saw her claim UFC gold.
This matchup pits Dumont's technical boxing and grappling against de Randamie's elite striking and veteran savvy. The odds slightly favor Dumont, but de Randamie's experience and knockout power make her a live underdog.
For Dumont to emerge victorious, she'll need to utilize her jab and footwork to control range while selectively changing levels for takedowns. If she can ground de Randamie and control positions, she can drain the Dutch striker's gas tank and open up opportunities for ground-and-pound.
De Randamie's keys to victory will be stuffing takedowns, maintaining distance, and unleashing her destructive kickboxing combinations. If she can keep the fight standing, her reach advantage and striking versatility could prove problematic for Dumont. However, she must be wary of Dumont's power and avoid being backed up to the fence where Dumont can unload strikes or change levels for takedowns.
The later rounds could be crucial, as both women have gone the distance multiple times. If Dumont can wear on de Randamie with grappling exchanges, she may take over down the stretch. But if de Randamie can maintain a striking rhythm and land clean shots, her power could be the difference-maker.
WolfTicketsAI favors Norma Dumont to defeat Germaine de Randamie based on a careful analysis of the fighters' attributes, performance metrics, and historical data. The Shap feature importance plot provides insights into the key factors driving this prediction.
Notably, the betting odds (-180 for Dumont, +150 for de Randamie) are a significant predictor, increasing the model's score by 5.0 points in Dumont's favor. This suggests the oddsmakers and betting public see value in Dumont, likely due to her recent performances and stylistic matchup.
Dumont's significant striking impact differential of +21 is another key factor, bumping the score by 4.0 points. She lands impactful strikes at a higher rate compared to the strikes she absorbs, which bodes well for her chances. De Randamie's differential is lower at +4.22, highlighting Dumont's edge in striking potency.
Conversely, de Randamie's TrueSkill rating of 38.04 is higher than Dumont's 32.15, decreasing the prediction score by 2.0 points. TrueSkill is a metric that assesses a fighter's overall skill level based on their wins, losses, and the quality of their opponents. De Randamie's higher rating suggests she has faced stiffer competition, but this is outweighed by other factors in the model's estimation.
Other variables like Dumont's higher recent significant striking impact differential (+23.81 vs +6.34) and superior recent takedown attempts per fight (2.34 vs 0.19) contribute to her favorable projection. However, de Randamie's striking output and accuracy pose a threat that Dumont must navigate carefully.
While the model sides with Dumont, this is a competitive matchup where the margin for error is slim. De Randamie's striking skills and submission abilities give her clear paths to victory. Nonetheless, Dumont's all-around game, positive performance trends, and favorable stylistic matchup make her a defensible pick to secure the win.
When assessing the reliability of the model's prediction, it's important to consider its historical performance on bouts involving these fighters. Unfortunately, the model has limited predictive data to draw from in this case.
For Norma Dumont, the model has a mixed track record. It correctly predicted her victory over Chelsea Chandler but incorrectly picked her to win against Karol Rosa and Macy Chiasson. With a 1-2 record in Dumont predictions, there is some uncertainty around the model's assessment of her fights.
Notably, there is no available data on the model's past predictions for Germaine de Randamie. This lack of historical performance makes it challenging to gauge how well the model has captured her fighting style and outcomes.
The absence of a robust prediction history for both fighters introduces additional risk factors for anyone considering betting based on this pick. While the model's current analysis is well-reasoned, the limited sample size of past predictions suggests a degree of caution is warranted.
As with any probabilistic model, WolfTicketsAI's predictions are not guarantees. Unforeseen factors like injuries, game plan changes, or stylistic clashes can always disrupt pre-fight projections. Bettors should carefully weigh the model's analysis against other sources of information and their own judgment before making any wagers.
WolfTicketsAI's prediction of a Norma Dumont victory over Germaine de Randamie is grounded in a detailed analysis of each fighter's attributes, performance metrics, and stylistic matchup. Dumont's edge in striking impact, recent form, and grappling potential give her a narrow but defensible path to victory.
However, the model's limited prediction history for both fighters introduces uncertainty around the pick. De Randamie's elite striking skills and submission abilities cannot be discounted, making this a highly competitive fight where the outcome is far from guaranteed.
Ultimately, this bout will likely hinge on Dumont's ability to control range, land impactful strikes, and selectively grapple against de Randamie's dangerous kickboxing arsenal. While the model favors Dumont, the tactical battle and potential momentum swings make this a fight where anything can happen.
As always, bettors should carefully consider the model's analysis in the context of other information sources and their own judgment. With two skilled and experienced competitors, Dumont vs de Randamie promises to be an entertaining and closely contested affair.
Stat | Norma Dumont | Germaine de Randamie | Weight Class Average | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Stats | ||||
Age | 33 | 39 | 33 | |
Height | 67" | 69" | 67" | |
Reach | 67" | 71" | 67" | |
Win Percentage | 83.33% | 71.43% | 76.07% | |
Wins | 11 | 10 | ||
Losses | 2 | 5 | ||
Wins at Weight Class | 1 | 6 | ||
Losses at Weight Class | 0 | 1 | ||
Striking Stats | ||||
Striking Accuracy | 60.39% | 60.63% | 47.80% | |
Significant Striking Accuracy | 49.94% | 48.01% | 40.96% | |
Strikes Landed Per Minute | 5.738 | 5.156 | 5.301 | |
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute | 3.409 | 2.776 | 3.576 | |
Knockdowns per Fight | 0.253 | 0.277 | 0.160 | |
Striking Impact Differential | 6.75% | -1.44% | 0.97% | |
Significant Striking Impact Differential | 21.00% | 4.22% | 1.46% | |
Striking Output Differential | -2.38% | -23.56% | 3.66% | |
Significant Striking Output Differential | 11.75% | -13.44% | 4.06% | |
Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 76.32% | 100.54% | 69.83% | |
Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 118.56% | 161.13% | 94.85% | |
Striking Defense Percentage | 66.99% | 64.84% | 44.89% | |
Takedown and Submission Stats | ||||
Submissions per Fight | 0.000 | 0.415 | 0.379 | |
Takedowns per Fight | 1.392 | 0.000 | 0.838 | |
Takedowns Attempted per Fight | 2.152 | 0.138 | 2.501 | |
Takedown Defense | 38.89% | 37.84% | 69.83% | |
Takedown Accuracy | 64.71% | 0.00% | 24.22% | |
Head Stats | ||||
Head Strikes Landed per Minute | 2.312 | 1.319 | 2.143 | |
Head Strikes Attempted per Minute | 5.425 | 4.031 | 5.684 | |
Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 1.114 | 1.199 | 1.902 | |
Body Stats | ||||
Body Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.658 | 0.932 | 0.902 | |
Body Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.835 | 1.116 | 1.229 | |
Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.532 | 0.526 | 0.818 | |
Leg Stats | ||||
Leg Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.439 | 0.526 | 0.532 | |
Leg kicks Attempted per Minute | 0.565 | 0.636 | 0.684 | |
Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute | 0.346 | 0.701 | 0.615 | |
Clinch Stats | ||||
Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.591 | 1.015 | 0.628 | |
Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.743 | 1.190 | 0.833 | |
Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.447 | 0.397 | 0.496 |
Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
July 15, 2023 | Women's Featherweight | Norma Dumont | Chelsea Chandler | Norma Dumont | |
April 22, 2023 | Women's Featherweight | Karol Rosa | Norma Dumont | Norma Dumont | |
Sept. 10, 2022 | Women's Featherweight | Norma Dumont | Danyelle Wolf | Norma Dumont | |
May 7, 2022 | Women's Featherweight | Macy Chiasson | Norma Dumont | Macy Chiasson | |
Oct. 16, 2021 | Women's Featherweight | Aspen Ladd | Norma Dumont | Norma Dumont | |
May 22, 2021 | Women's Featherweight | Felicia Spencer | Norma Dumont | Norma Dumont | |
Nov. 28, 2020 | Women's Bantamweight | Ashlee Evans-Smith | Norma Dumont | Norma Dumont | |
Feb. 29, 2020 | Women's Featherweight | Megan Anderson | Norma Dumont | Megan Anderson |
Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct. 3, 2020 | Women's Bantamweight | Germaine de Randamie | Julianna Pena | Germaine de Randamie | |
Dec. 14, 2019 | UFC Women's Bantamweight Title | Amanda Nunes | Germaine de Randamie | Amanda Nunes | |
July 13, 2019 | Women's Bantamweight | Germaine de Randamie | Aspen Ladd | Germaine de Randamie | |
Nov. 10, 2018 | Women's Bantamweight | Raquel Pennington | Germaine de Randamie | Germaine de Randamie | |
Feb. 11, 2017 | UFC Women's Featherweight Title | Holly Holm | Germaine de Randamie | Germaine de Randamie | |
May 8, 2016 | Women's Bantamweight | Germaine de Randamie | Anna Elmose | Germaine de Randamie | |
March 14, 2015 | Women's Bantamweight | Larissa Pacheco | Germaine de Randamie | Germaine de Randamie | |
Nov. 6, 2013 | Women's Bantamweight | Amanda Nunes | Germaine de Randamie | Amanda Nunes | |
July 27, 2013 | Women's Bantamweight | Julie Kedzie | Germaine de Randamie | Germaine de Randamie |