The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Recent Prediction
This prediction includes detailed insights.
Predicted Winner: Fares Ziam
Weight Class: Lightweight
Final Confidence: 2.8
Value: -30.0%
Reason: Base confidence < 10, decreased by 30%
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Score: 4
Odds:
Fares Ziam: +114
Mike Davis: -146
Fares Ziam enters on a strong run of recent UFC victories, finishing Matt Frevola by TKO and picking up decisions over Claudio Puelles and Jai Herbert. Distance management stands out in Ziam’s style. He prefers to stay at range and pile up jabs and long kicks. Against Frevola, he caught him rushing in and established a steady rhythm of counters before delivering the finishing shot. Earlier in his career, he showed grappling vulnerabilities, especially in a submission loss to Terrance McKinney, but his clinch work and takedown defense have improved. His growth as a fighter has focused on avoiding early mistakes and making use of his reach (75 inches) and striking accuracy to pick opponents apart.
Mike Davis wields a heavier emphasis on power and offensive wrestling. He has four wins in his last five fights, including a slick submission of Natan Levy and a grinding decision over Viacheslav Borshchev. Davis mixes fluid boxing combinations with strong clinch entries, then hunts takedowns (averaging 3.46 per fight) to impose top control. He’s comfortable maintaining a fast pace but sometimes absorbs more head strikes than he’d like while pushing forward. In the Levy fight, he knocked him down early, then patiently moved to an arm-triangle finish. His 72-inch reach is slightly shorter than Ziam’s, so Davis may look to close the gap, work body shots or leg kicks, and test Ziam’s grappling defense.
WolfTicketsAI’s model favors Ziam. Key stats from the SHAP data that boosted or lowered his score:
Other factors like improved striking defense and consistent output also weighed in favor of Ziam.
WolfTicketsAI has been correct in all four predictions involving Fares Ziam and also accurate in both predictions made for Mike Davis. The model’s track record with these fighters adds confidence but doesn’t guarantee a sure outcome, given both are on win streaks and show well-rounded skill sets.
Ziam’s sharp distance striking, recent improvements in takedown defense, and momentum underscore the pick for him to win. Davis’s pressure and wrestling present real dangers, yet WolfTicketsAI sees Ziam’s consistency, reach advantage, and polished counter game swinging the fight in his favor.
Stat | Fares Ziam | Mike Davis | Weight Class Average | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Stats | ||||
Age | 27 | 32 | 32 | |
Height | 73" | 72" | 70" | |
Reach | 75" | 72" | 72" | |
Win Percentage | 80.00% | 84.62% | 79.69% | |
Wins | 17 | 11 | ||
Losses | 4 | 3 | ||
Wins at Weight Class | 6 | 4 | ||
Losses at Weight Class | 2 | 1 | ||
Striking Stats | ||||
Striking Accuracy | 60.92% | 56.55% | 46.68% | |
Significant Striking Accuracy | 50.74% | 53.51% | 41.32% | |
Strikes Landed Per Minute | 4.773 | 6.259 | 5.082 | |
Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute | 2.919 | 5.402 | 3.794 | |
Knockdowns per Fight | 0.143 | 0.741 | 0.463 | |
Striking Impact Differential | 22.88% | -4.80% | 3.76% | |
Significant Striking Impact Differential | 16.50% | 0.60% | 2.46% | |
Striking Output Differential | 15.25% | -36.20% | 5.92% | |
Significant Striking Output Differential | 10.88% | -31.20% | 4.13% | |
Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 76.29% | 118.16% | 80.12% | |
Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 111.73% | 135.37% | 101.82% | |
Striking Defense Percentage | 66.22% | 57.74% | 46.84% | |
Takedown and Submission Stats | ||||
Submissions per Fight | 0.285 | 0.494 | 0.466 | |
Takedowns per Fight | 1.284 | 3.459 | 1.484 | |
Takedowns Attempted per Fight | 3.566 | 5.435 | 3.921 | |
Takedown Defense | 47.37% | 62.50% | 84.01% | |
Takedown Accuracy | 36.00% | 63.64% | 29.23% | |
Head Stats | ||||
Head Strikes Landed per Minute | 1.845 | 3.475 | 2.364 | |
Head Strikes Attempted per Minute | 4.545 | 7.412 | 6.150 | |
Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.637 | 3.212 | 2.193 | |
Body Stats | ||||
Body Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.590 | 1.400 | 0.857 | |
Body Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.685 | 2.009 | 1.219 | |
Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.590 | 0.906 | 0.776 | |
Leg Stats | ||||
Leg Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.485 | 0.527 | 0.573 | |
Leg kicks Attempted per Minute | 0.523 | 0.675 | 0.682 | |
Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute | 0.437 | 1.235 | 0.561 | |
Clinch Stats | ||||
Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.352 | 0.461 | 0.392 | |
Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.475 | 0.576 | 0.545 | |
Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.257 | 0.379 | 0.369 |
Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sept. 28, 2024 | Lightweight | Fares Ziam | Matt Frevola | Fares Ziam | |
Feb. 24, 2024 | Lightweight | Claudio Puelles | Fares Ziam | Fares Ziam | |
July 22, 2023 | Lightweight | Jai Herbert | Fares Ziam | Fares Ziam | |
Sept. 3, 2022 | Lightweight | Fares Ziam | Michal Figlak | Fares Ziam | |
Feb. 26, 2022 | Lightweight | Terrance McKinney | Fares Ziam | Terrance McKinney | |
June 12, 2021 | Lightweight | Fares Ziam | Luigi Vendramini | Fares Ziam | |
Oct. 17, 2020 | Lightweight | Jamie Mullarkey | Fares Ziam | Fares Ziam | |
Sept. 7, 2019 | Lightweight | Don Madge | Fares Ziam | Don Madge |
Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 16, 2024 | Lightweight | Natan Levy | Mike Davis | Mike Davis | |
Oct. 1, 2022 | Lightweight | Mike Davis | Viacheslav Borshchev | Mike Davis | |
Jan. 20, 2021 | Lightweight | Mike Davis | Mason Jones | Mike Davis | |
Oct. 12, 2019 | Lightweight | Mike Davis | Thomas Gifford | Mike Davis | |
April 27, 2019 | Lightweight | Gilbert Burns | Mike Davis | Gilbert Burns |