The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
This radar chart shows each fighter's strengths across key fighting dimensions. Each dimension is scored 0-100 based on their percentile ranking within the Welterweight weight class.
Recent Prediction
This prediction includes detailed insights.
Predicted Winner: Sean Brady
Weight Class: Welterweight
Final Confidence: 2.8
Value: -30.0%
Reason: Base confidence < 10, decreased by 30%
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Weight Change: Staying at usual weight
Score: 4
Odds:
Sean Brady: -148
Michael Morales: 116
Brady brings elite-level grappling to this welterweight clash, and his recent performances show he's figured out how to weaponize it against high-level competition. Against Leon Edwards, he displayed the blueprint: use low kicks to freeze opponents on single-leg checks, then explode into hip-level takedown entries that bypass the clinch entirely. That mounted guillotine finish in round four wasn't luck—Brady concealed his grip behind his hip, controlled Edwards' defensive hands, and waited for the positional shift before committing full pressure.
His half-guard passing system is suffocating. Brady uses armpit positioning instead of traditional crossface pressure, manipulating the trapped leg with elbow-to-thigh pressure while executing heel-toe stepping progressions. Against Edwards, this created three-quarter mount positions that allowed mount-level striking with superior control retention. The Kimura became his control multiplier—threatening the submission when opponents posted, creating underhooks for ground strikes, or forcing defensive reactions that opened passing lanes.
Brady's striking has evolved significantly since the Belal Muhammad loss. Against Burns, he landed a 1-2-left uppercut combination repeatedly by exploiting Burns' long guard defensive posture. His double jab variation—throwing the first hard enough to get blocked, immediately following with a second that lands clean—showed technical sophistication. The inside low kicks serve dual purposes: establishing range and creating checking reactions that freeze opponents momentarily, opening windows for his explosive level changes.
His recent win streak (4-0 since the Muhammad loss) includes three finishes and a decision over Burns. Brady's averaging 3.8 takedowns per fight recently with 60% accuracy, and his submission rate has jumped to 1.13 per fight. That's not grinding—that's systematic finishing.
Brady's clinch defense remains exploitable. Edwards repeatedly secured left-side underhook with heavy head pressure and opposite-hand control, landing clean knees throughout round one. Brady showed limited answers to this specific tie-up structure, repeatedly entering into the same defensive position. Against Muhammad, this vulnerability manifested differently—Brady tired from his own output throwing one-two combinations without sufficient variety, eventually getting overwhelmed.
His striking foundation, while improved, lacks the depth to win rounds against elite welterweight strikers. Brady landed effectively against Edwards by surprising him with timing, but showed no ability to systematically break down defense through volume or combination variety. His low kick attacks, though tactically sound, left him vulnerable to counter exchanges. Against Burns, a lazy step-up body kick got countered with a right hand that momentarily stunned him.
Brady's defensive reactions to submission threats showed panic elements during Edwards' mounted guillotine attempt. He concealed his hand behind his hip reactively rather than proactively preventing grip completion. His cardio also appears questionable—the Muhammad fight revealed he can tire from his own offensive output, particularly when relying heavily on forward pressure without efficient energy management.
Morales brings knockout power wrapped in a 6'2" frame with 79" reach, and he's been starching opponents at welterweight. His signature sequence—a slapping left hook while simultaneously loading a looping right hand from below waist level—generates Foreman-esque power. Against Burns, this exaggerated wind-up connected flush and shifted the fight's momentum immediately. That first-round finish showcased his best technical work: pushing Burns' hand down in the over-under, stepping off the fence to create angles, delivering elbows from collar ties, then opening up with extended combinations.
His jab, despite mechanical flaws, functions effectively due to his reach advantage. Morales uses it as a range-finder, extending from distance to keep opponents at bay. Against Magny, he immediately identified the leg kick vulnerability and exploited it with 3-4 heavy low kicks in the first minute, compromising Magny's mobility. When Magny clinched, Morales employed the "backpack lock" defense—turning his back momentarily to separate hands, then pivoting back with a fight-ending elbow.
The counter right hand over extended jabs is money for Morales. Against Matthews, he used inside shin kicks to deter forward movement, then timed Matthews' entries with his right hand. His Superman punch off the fence and feinted cage pushes show creativity in cage escapes. At 25 years old with a perfect 18-0 record, Morales averages 1.68 knockdowns per fight and lands 6.2 significant strikes per minute with 50% accuracy.
Morales' defensive hand positioning during offensive entries is catastrophic against technical strikers. He consistently drops his rear hand to chest level when stepping forward with his lead hand, creating massive openings for counter left hooks. Burns landed multiple clean left hooks—the same punch that's knocked out Maia and dropped Usman—yet Morales' durability masked the technical deficiency. This reliance on chin over technique won't hold against Brady's systematic pressure.
His elevated chin during jab execution mirrors preliminary-level flaws. Morales lifts his chin and partially diverts visual focus when extending his jab, creating a direct highway for counter right hands. His binary fighting mode—either maintaining safe distance with minimal output or abandoning defensive responsibility entirely when aggressive—lacks the gradation required against elite competition.
Morales' takedown defense is largely untested. He's faced 1.12 takedown attempts per fight and defended only 12.35% successfully. His ground game remains a mystery—zero submission attempts in his UFC career. Against Magny, he showed competent clinch defense, but Magny's wrestling is nowhere near Brady's level. The limited combination arsenal also hurts—Morales relies heavily on his right hand while underutilizing his left side, creating predictability that Brady's defensive wrestling can exploit.
Brady's explosive hip-level takedown entries directly attack Morales' biggest weakness. When Morales drops his rear hand loading that looping right, Brady can time level changes that bypass striking exchanges entirely. Morales' elevated chin during jab extensions gives Brady clean looks for his own straight right, but more importantly, creates windows for Brady to shoot underneath.
Morales' inside shin kicks—effective against Matthews and Magny—won't deter Brady's wrestling-first approach. Brady's low kicks serve a different purpose: creating checking reactions that freeze opponents momentarily, opening windows for explosive shots. Morales hasn't faced anyone who chains takedown attempts like Brady (6.7 attempts per fight recently).
The clinch presents Brady's clearest path to victory. Morales' over-under work against Burns was impressive, but Burns is a diminished fighter at 38 years old. Brady's systematic half-guard passing and Kimura control will test Morales' completely unproven ground game. Once Brady establishes top position, Morales has shown nothing suggesting he can sweep, submit, or even effectively defend against Brady's methodical advancement.
Morales needs to keep this fight at kicking range and punish Brady's takedown entries with counter strikes. His reach advantage (79" vs 72") should allow him to pot-shot from distance. But Brady's patient approach—using low kicks to create checking reactions, then exploding into shots—neutralizes reach advantages by attacking when opponents are stationary.
Early rounds: Morales will likely establish his jab and look to counter Brady's entries. Brady needs to weather early power shots while establishing his low kick checking game. The first takedown attempt will reveal whether Morales' takedown defense can hold—if Brady gets him down early, this fight's trajectory shifts dramatically.
Mid-fight adjustments: If Morales stuffs initial takedowns, Brady will increase volume on low kicks and striking combinations to create fatigue and openings. Morales must maintain distance discipline—any clinch exchanges favor Brady's positional control. Brady's cardio questions from the Muhammad fight could resurface if Morales forces high-output striking exchanges.
Championship rounds: This fight likely doesn't see round five. Brady's submission rate (1.13 per fight recently) suggests he finishes opponents once he establishes control. Morales' knockout power means he's always dangerous, but his defensive flaws become more pronounced as fatigue sets in. Brady's systematic approach—takedown, pass, submit—should overwhelm Morales' limited grappling experience.
The model heavily favors Brady based on several key differentials. Odds increased the score by 3 points—Brady's -148 line reflects bookmaker confidence in his grappling advantage. Recent Win Percentage added another 3 points, with Brady's perfect 4-0 run since the Muhammad loss showing clear upward trajectory.
Recent Takedowns Attempted per Fight boosted the score by 2 points—Brady's 6.99 attempts per fight recently versus Morales' 1.34 attempts demonstrates the grappling volume disparity. Striking Impact Differential added 2 points, favoring Brady's systematic approach over Morales' power-punching style.
Reach decreased the score by 3 points, acknowledging Morales' 7-inch advantage. But Brady's wrestling-first approach neutralizes reach advantages by attacking when opponents are stationary on single-leg checks. Significant Striking Output Differential decreased the score by 1 point, reflecting Morales' knockout power, but the model correctly weighs grappling control over striking potential in this matchup.
WolfTicketsAI has been perfect on Brady recently—correctly predicting his wins over Edwards (0.55 score), Burns (0.63), and Gastelum (0.62). The only miss came against Muhammad (0.27 score), where Brady's cardio failed and Muhammad's striking overwhelmed him. That loss taught Brady to abandon extended clinch exchanges where he tires, instead timing explosive shots that bypass energy-draining positions.
For Morales, the model's been equally accurate—correctly predicting wins over Burns (0.80), Magny (0.70), Matthews (0.67), and Griffin (0.31). The model recognizes Morales' knockout power but hasn't been tested against elite grapplers. This matchup presents Morales' first true wrestling challenge.
Brady takes this fight through systematic grappling dominance. Morales' defensive flaws—dropped rear hand during entries, elevated chin during jabs—create windows for Brady's explosive takedown entries. Once Brady establishes top position, Morales' completely unproven ground game gets exposed by Brady's methodical half-guard passing and Kimura control. The mounted guillotine that finished Edwards or the kimura that tapped Gastelum both present realistic finishing sequences against Morales' limited grappling experience. Brady by submission, round three.
| Stat | Sean Brady | Michael Morales | Weight Class Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Stats | ||||
| Age | 32 | 26 | 33 | |
| Height | 70" | 72" | 72" | |
| Reach | 72" | 79" | 75" | |
| Win Percentage | 94.74% | 100.00% | 78.33% | |
| Wins | 18 | 19 | ||
| Losses | 2 | 0 | ||
| Wins at Weight Class | 8 | 6 | ||
| Losses at Weight Class | 1 | 0 | ||
| Striking Stats | ||||
| Striking Accuracy | 68.62% | 51.40% | 49.99% | |
| Significant Striking Accuracy | 55.69% | 50.23% | 45.21% | |
| Strikes Landed Per Minute | 9.128 | 6.499 | 5.411 | |
| Significant Strikes Landed Per Minute | 4.003 | 6.200 | 4.119 | |
| Knockdowns per Fight | 0.117 | 1.681 | 0.596 | |
| Striking Impact Differential | 76.22% | 26.00% | 6.44% | |
| Significant Striking Impact Differential | 15.11% | 26.17% | 4.77% | |
| Striking Output Differential | 73.33% | 41.83% | 8.52% | |
| Significant Striking Output Differential | -0.89% | 42.17% | 6.67% | |
| Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 47.95% | 67.24% | 81.81% | |
| Significant Striking Defense to Offense Ratio | 107.59% | 70.18% | 98.38% | |
| Striking Defense Percentage | 59.40% | 57.11% | 49.52% | |
| Takedown and Submission Stats | ||||
| Submissions per Fight | 0.935 | 0.000 | 0.459 | |
| Takedowns per Fight | 3.622 | 0.280 | 1.332 | |
| Takedowns Attempted per Fight | 6.659 | 1.120 | 3.335 | |
| Takedown Defense | 15.38% | 13.64% | 71.28% | |
| Takedown Accuracy | 54.39% | 25.00% | 35.49% | |
| Head Stats | ||||
| Head Strikes Landed per Minute | 2.734 | 4.893 | 2.608 | |
| Head Strikes Attempted per Minute | 5.701 | 10.607 | 6.559 | |
| Head Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 1.830 | 1.886 | 2.368 | |
| Body Stats | ||||
| Body Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.312 | 0.448 | 0.827 | |
| Body Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.421 | 0.635 | 1.179 | |
| Body Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.662 | 0.822 | 0.721 | |
| Leg Stats | ||||
| Leg Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.958 | 0.859 | 0.684 | |
| Leg kicks Attempted per Minute | 1.067 | 1.102 | 0.818 | |
| Leg kicks Absorbed per Minute | 0.452 | 0.560 | 0.642 | |
| Clinch Stats | ||||
| Clinch Strikes Landed per Minute | 0.187 | 0.411 | 0.421 | |
| Clinch Strikes Attempted per Minute | 0.226 | 0.672 | 0.583 | |
| Clinch Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 0.366 | 0.205 | 0.385 | |
| Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 22, 2025 | Welterweight | Leon Edwards | Sean Brady | Sean Brady | |
| Sept. 7, 2024 | Welterweight | Gilbert Burns | Sean Brady | Sean Brady | |
| Dec. 2, 2023 | Welterweight | Sean Brady | Kelvin Gastelum | Sean Brady | |
| Oct. 22, 2022 | Welterweight | Belal Muhammad | Sean Brady | Belal Muhammad | |
| Nov. 20, 2021 | Welterweight | Michael Chiesa | Sean Brady | Sean Brady | |
| March 6, 2021 | Welterweight | Sean Brady | Jake Matthews | Sean Brady | |
| Aug. 29, 2020 | Welterweight | Sean Brady | Christian Aguilera | Sean Brady | |
| Feb. 29, 2020 | Welterweight | Sean Brady | Ismail Naurdiev | Sean Brady | |
| Oct. 18, 2019 | Welterweight | Court McGee | Sean Brady | Sean Brady |
| Date | Weight | Elevation | Red Corner | Blue Corner | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2025 | Welterweight | Gilbert Burns | Michael Morales | Michael Morales | |
| Aug. 24, 2024 | Welterweight | Neil Magny | Michael Morales | Michael Morales | |
| Nov. 18, 2023 | Welterweight | Michael Morales | Jake Matthews | Michael Morales | |
| July 1, 2023 | Welterweight | Max Griffin | Michael Morales | Michael Morales | |
| July 30, 2022 | Welterweight | Michael Morales | Adam Fugitt | Michael Morales | |
| Jan. 22, 2022 | Welterweight | Michael Morales | Trevin Giles | Michael Morales |