WTAI Model | Profit Model | Plain Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full | Main | Under | Full | Main | Under | Full |
80.0% | 66.67% | 72.73% | 100.0% | 33.33% | 63.64% | 80.0% | 33.33% | 54.55% |
WTAI Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
80.0% | 66.67% | 72.73% |
Profit Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
100.0% | 33.33% | 63.64% |
Plain Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
80.0% | 33.33% | 54.55% |
The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Score: 28 Odds: Jon Jones: -700 Stipe Miocic: 440
Jon Jones is widely regarded as one of the greatest mixed martial artists of all time. His well-rounded skillset, fight IQ, and ability to adapt make him a formidable opponent for anyone.
Jones excels in using his 84.5 inch reach, 8.5 inches longer than Miocic's, to keep opponents at range and pick them apart with precise kicks and punches. He mixes this up with explosive takedowns, having landed nearly 2 takedowns per fight in his UFC career.
On the mat, Jones is a nightmare. He seamlessly flows between positions, unleashing brutal ground and pound and hunting for submissions. Against Ciryl Gane, he secured a quick takedown and transitioned to an inescapable guillotine choke for the win. This grappling prowess will be a huge factor against Miocic.
Jones is also extremely durable and has never been finished by strikes in his career. His lone loss is by disqualification. He has the cardio to relentlessly pressure opponents for 5 hard rounds.
The only potential concern for Jones is the long layoff and move up to heavyweight. But he looked better than ever in his HW debut against Gane. At age 35, a focused Jones is still in his prime.
Stipe Miocic is the most accomplished UFC heavyweight ever. A strong boxer with Division I wrestling credentials, Miocic has beaten legends like Arlovski, Werdum, Overeem, dos Santos, and Cormier.
On the feet, Miocic has excellent footwork and head movement. He puts together crisp boxing combinations, often finishing with hard right hands. He lands 4.8 significant strikes per minute while absorbing only 4.2.
Miocic is also very effective with his wrestling. He lands 1.86 takedowns per fight at a 34% accuracy rate. From top position, he unleashes brutal ground and pound. The Cormier trilogy showed he can nullify elite wrestlers.
However, Miocic will be at a significant disadvantage in reach against Jones. He'll have a hard time getting inside Jones' range to land his boxing combinations without eating shots.
Miocic's chin is also becoming a concern. He's been knocked out in 2 of his last 4 fights, by Francis Ngannou and Daniel Cormier. At age 40, his durability and reflexes may be declining.
Jones' huge reach advantage will be very difficult for Miocic to overcome. He'll use his 84.5" reach to piece up Miocic at range.
Jones is the far more proven and dangerous grappler. If he can take Miocic down, he can control him and unleash brutal GnP.
Miocic has the boxing advantage, but will struggle to get inside Jones' range to land his shots. He'll likely take a lot of damage trying to close distance.
Miocic's chin and age are becoming concerns, especially against a finisher like Jones. His last few KO losses are worrying.
Jones has looked better than ever and is a stylistic nightmare for Miocic with his reach, versatility and grappling.
Striking Impact Differential: Jones has a massive edge here at 30.73 vs 11.16 for Miocic recently. This shows Jones lands much harder shots on a relative basis.
Significant Striking Defense Percentage: Jones' 71.3% is far better than Miocic's 61.1% recently. Jones is much harder to hit cleanly.
Reach: Jones will have a huge 8.5 inch reach advantage. This will allow him to land shots from distance that Miocic can't easily counter.
Recent Knockdowns per Fight: Jones at 0.25 vs 0.58 for Miocic. Miocic has been getting dropped more as he ages. Not good against a finisher like Jones.
Jon Jones: - Model is 1-0 predicting Jones' fights - Lone prediction was his win over Ciryl Gane, predicted correctly
Stipe Miocic: - No previous predictions for Miocic
With no prior data on Miocic and the model being 1-0 on Jones, there are no major red flags based on past predictions. The model got Jones' last fight correct.
WolfTicketsAI likes Jon Jones to get his hand raised against Stipe Miocic. Jones' huge reach and grappling advantages will be very difficult for the 40-year-old Miocic to overcome. While Miocic has the edge in boxing, his declining chin and Jones' reach will make it very hard for him to implement his gameplan. Expect Jones to piece Miocic up from range and potentially find a submission if he gets it to the mat. All signs point to the younger, longer, and more well-rounded Jones getting it done.
Score: 18 Odds: Charles Oliveira: -265 Michael Chandler: 200
Charles Oliveira is a dynamic and versatile fighter known for his exceptional grappling skills and aggressive striking. His ability to seamlessly transition between these disciplines makes him a formidable opponent.
Oliveira's jiu-jitsu is among the best in the UFC, with a wide array of submission techniques in his arsenal. He has a knack for catching opponents with slick transitions from guard to submission holds. His guillotine choke and rear-naked choke are particularly potent weapons.
On the feet, Oliveira has evolved significantly. While initially known more for his grappling, his striking has become precise and powerful. He utilizes crisp Muay Thai techniques like knees and elbows in the clinch to great effect.
A key strength is his relentless pressure and pace. Oliveira is constantly moving forward, throwing volume, and looking to drag opponents into deep waters. His cardio allows him to maintain this pressure late into fights.
Despite his strengths, Oliveira does have some vulnerabilities. His striking defense can be porous at times, leaving him open to counters. And while a skilled grappler offensively, he has been controlled and submitted by high-level wrestlers in the past.
However, his recent performances showcase his evolution and ability to overcome adversity. Comeback wins over Dustin Poirier and Justin Gaethje highlight his heart, durability, and finishing instincts.
Michael Chandler is an explosive and powerful athlete with a wrestling base. He's known for his aggressive, forward-pressing style and fight-changing knockout power.
Chandler's best weapons are his overhand right and explosive double-leg takedown. He excels at closing the distance quickly with his speed and forcing opponents to the cage.
From top position, Chandler has brutal ground-and-pound. He postures up well and rains down heavy shots. His ability to take the back and secure a rear-naked choke submission is also noteworthy.
Despite his wrestling pedigree, Chandler often prefers to keep fights standing and hunt for the knockout. His striking, while powerful, can be somewhat rudimentary technically.
Chandler's limitations have been exposed in longer fights where he fades cardio-wise. His striking defense is a concern, as he can be hit cleanly when wading forward. Skilled submission artists have also exploited Chandler's sometimes overaggressive grappling.
While dangerous early, if Chandler can't secure a finish, he becomes increasingly vulnerable as the fight progresses. Losses to Charles Oliveira, Justin Gaethje, and Dustin Poirier have followed this pattern.
However, Chandler's power and explosiveness mean he's always a live dog. His front kick KO of Tony Ferguson showed his ability to produce spectacular finishes from unique techniques.
Oliveira and Chandler previously fought at UFC 262 for the vacant lightweight title. - Round 1 was all Chandler. He hurt Oliveira badly with punches, nearly finishing him. Chandler's power and explosiveness were on full display. - In Round 2, Oliveira recovered and hurt Chandler with a counter left before swarming with punches for the TKO. Oliveira's heart, durability and finishing instincts shined through.
This fight showed the contrasting dynamics at play. Chandler's fast start and power vs Oliveira's resilience and ability to weather the storm and rally back. Chandler faded after not getting the early finish, while Oliveira got stronger as the fight went on.
The model favors Oliveira, and the stats provide insight as to why:
For Charles Oliveira, WolfTickets has made 4 predictions: - Correct: Picked Oliveira to beat Gaethje and Ferguson - Incorrect: Picked Oliveira to beat Makhachev and Dariush There is some risk that the loss to Makhachev could repeat here against another strong wrestler in Chandler.
For Michael Chandler, WolfTickets has made 2 predictions: - Correct: Picked Chandler to beat Ferguson, and picked Poirier to beat Chandler The model has been accurate so far but the small sample size makes it hard to draw firm conclusions.
This is a fascinating clash of styles between two of the most exciting finishers in the lightweight division. Oliveira's slick submissions and technical striking match up against Chandler's explosiveness and knockout power.
The stats and the model point to Oliveira as a justified favorite given his striking edge, submission skills, and superior cardio. However, Chandler's power and wrestling mean he's always dangerous, especially early.
Ultimately, Oliveira's durability, pace, and ability to capitalize on mistakes give him the edge. If he can weather Chandler's early onslaught, his chances of finding a finish grow as the fight progresses.
While not a lock by any means given Chandler's finishing ability, the pick is Charles Oliveira to once again overcome adversity and secure a submission or TKO victory in the middle rounds.
Score: 28 Odds: Bo Nickal: -1400 Paul Craig: 750
Bo Nickal is a rising star in the UFC's middleweight division, known for his exceptional wrestling pedigree. He utilizes his elite grappling skills to dominate opponents, secure takedowns, and control the fight on the ground. Nickal has adapted his folkstyle wrestling game effectively for MMA, incorporating striking to set up shots and using ground-and-pound and submissions to finish fights.
In his most recent wins over Cody Brundage and Val Woodburn, Nickal showcased his evolving game. Against Brundage, he employed relentless wrestling pressure, smothering him on the ground en route to a submission win. With Woodburn, Nickal's striking took center stage, landing a spectacular leaping lead hook KO reminiscent of Kevin Randleman vs Cro Cop. This knockout illustrated Nickal's growing confidence on the feet.
For future opponents, the key will be surviving Nickal's early onslaught, defending takedowns, and testing his cardio deep into fights. Nickal's pace and pressure can be overwhelming, so counterstriking and creating scrambles will be crucial. Overall, Nickal's rapid evolution and well-rounded skills make him a difficult puzzle to solve at middleweight.
Paul Craig is a veteran submission specialist known for his dangerous guard and unorthodox grappling attacks. He excels at pulling guard, attacking leg locks, and securing come-from-behind wins with triangles and armbars late in fights. Craig's resilience and submission threat make him a live dog even when losing on the scorecards.
However, in recent fights, the holes in Craig's game have been exposed. Against grapplers who can neutralize his guard, like Brendan Allen, Craig struggles to generate offense. His striking defense and wrestling have long been question marks, which elite fighters like Johnny Walker and Volkan Oezdemir exploited for TKO wins. At 35 years old, Craig may be on the downslope of his career.
To beat Nickal, Craig will need to utilize his full bag of submission tricks, attacking from his back and in transitions. Dragging Nickal into deep waters and baiting him into grappling exchanges may be Craig's best path to victory. But he can't afford to absorb too much damage before getting to his A-game.
Bo Nickal and Paul Craig have not previously fought in the UFC.
On 2024-04-13, WolfTickets correctly predicted Bo Nickal to beat Cody Brundage with a high confidence score of 0.80. This suggests the model has a good read on Nickal's skill set and fight-winning capabilities.
For Paul Craig, the model has had more mixed results: - Correctly predicted Caio Borralho and Brendan Allen to beat Craig, but incorrectly picked Andre Muniz and Nikita Krylov to win. - Had less confidence overall in Craig-related predictions, with scores ranging from 0.25 to 0.78. - The Volkan Oezdemir fight stands out as a relatively high confidence pick (0.73) that Craig lost, indicating the model may slightly overrate him.
This prediction history suggests more confidence in the model's assessment of Bo Nickal than Paul Craig, which aligns with the 28 point score in favor of Nickal.
Bo Nickal enters this fight as a substantial favorite, and with good reason. His dominant wrestling, improving striking, and overall athletic talents pose a stylistic nightmare for Paul Craig. While Craig's submission prowess always makes him live, the gulf in wrestling and recent quality of wins decidedly favors Nickal.
Barring a crafty submission from Craig, Bo Nickal should steamroll his way to another impressive UFC victory as he continues his ascent up the middleweight ranks. An early ground-and-pound TKO or submission victory for the standout prospect Nickal seems most probable.
Score: 17
Odds:
Viviane Araujo: 220
Karine Silva: -295
Viviane Araujo is a skilled striker known for her speed, sharp jabs, and effective movement in the octagon. She uses her footwork to maintain distance and avoid takedowns, while peppering opponents with quick, accurate strikes. Araujo's recent UFC fights have been a mixed bag. While she showcased her striking skills in wins over fighters like Jennifer Maia, she has struggled when facing heavy grapplers and pressure fighters.
Araujo's takedown defense and ability to get back to her feet will be critical in this matchup. In past losses to wrestlers like Alexis Davis and Jessica Eye, Araujo was controlled on the ground for long stretches. Against Silva's aggressive submission game, Araujo needs to keep the fight standing where she can utilize her superior striking.
One bright spot for Araujo is her toughness and resilience. Even in her decision loss to Amanda Ribas, she survived an early onslaught and kept fighting hard for all three rounds. She will need to dig deep into that well of grit to fend off Silva's relentless attack.
Karine Silva is an absolute bulldozer in the women's flyweight division. With a perfect 100% finishing rate, she overwhelms opponents with constant forward pressure, heavy strikes, and a lethal submission game. Silva's last three UFC wins have all come via first-round stoppage, a first for a female UFC fighter.
The key to Silva's success is her seamless blending of striking and grappling. She'll lunge in with powerful overhand punches to close the distance, then immediately transition to takedowns and an oppressive top game. Once she gets opponents to the mat, Silva is a submission machine, always threatening with chokes and joint locks from every position.
In her most recent win over Maryna Moroz, Silva showed her full arsenal. After an initial feeling out process on the feet, Silva dragged Moroz to the ground and quickly advanced to a dominant position. From there, she locked up a fight-ending guillotine choke with just one second left in the first round. It was a statement performance against a very tough opponent.
This is a classic striker vs grappler matchup, but Silva's all-around skills give her a clear edge:
Grappling Advantage: Silva's aggressive wrestling and submission skills pose a huge threat to Araujo. If Silva can get the fight to the mat consistently, it could be a short night for Araujo.
Striking Power: While Araujo is the faster, more technical striker, Silva has serious KO power in her hands. Araujo needs to be wary of getting clipped during Silva's bum rushes.
Pace and Pressure: Silva pushes a relentless, exhausting pace that has wilted many opponents. Araujo has historically struggled with pressure fighters and will need to manage her energy carefully.
Limited Path to Victory: Araujo's clearest path to victory is to keep the fight standing and win a decision on points. But that's easier said than done over 3-5 rounds against a finisher like Silva.
To unpack why the model is favoring Silva, let's look at some key features from the SHAP data:
TrueSkill: Silva's TrueSkill rating is higher than Araujo's, indicating the model sees her as the superior overall fighter based on strength of competition.
Striking Output and Impact: The model notes that Silva leads Araujo in both striking output (+11 differential) and impact (+2 significant strikes landed per min). This shows Silva can match Araujo on the feet.
Reach: Silva will have a 1-inch reach advantage, which may help her get inside on Araujo's jab and set up takedowns.
Takedowns: Silva attempts nearly 5 takedowns per fight to Araujo's 4.4, with a much higher accuracy (89% vs 40%). If Silva can reliably drag Araujo to the mat, she'll have a huge edge with her submission game.
For Viviane Araujo, the model had mixed results, correctly picking her to lose to Alexa Grasso and Amanda Ribas but incorrectly predicting her to beat Andrea Lee. Its accuracy is only 50% for Araujo.
Meanwhile, for Karine Silva, the model correctly called her recent dominant win over Maryna Moroz, but was wrong in picking against her versus Ariane da Silva. It's batting 67% in Silva's last 3 fights.
Overall, the model seems more "sure" about Silva, likely due to her perfect finishing record and unstoppable momentum. But it has been less reliable in predicting Araujo's fights, so there is some uncertainty.
While Araujo is a skilled, experienced fighter, this looks like a nightmare matchup for her. Silva's overwhelming wrestling and submission arsenal is tailormade to exploit Araujo's weaknesses. Unless Araujo can consistently stuff takedowns and out-point Silva for a full 15-25 minutes, the Brazilian bulldozer should run through her like she has everyone else.
Silva via submission is the most likely outcome, but a ground-and-pound TKO would not be surprising either if Araujo continually gives up positions on the mat. It will take a herculean effort from Araujo to pull off the upset, and while she has the toughness to go the distance, it's hard to see her having the requisite grappling skills to keep Silva off of her for that long.
WolfTicketsAI has spoken: bet on Karine "The Brazilian Bulldozer" Silva to get it done inside the distance. The hype train rolls on.
Score: 32 Odds: Mauricio Ruffy: -900 James Llontop: 575
Mauricio Ruffy is a powerful, aggressive striker known for finishing fights early. His last fight against Jamie Mullarkey showcased his explosive striking and ability to dictate the pace. Key points:
With 10 wins (7 in the 1st round) and only 1 loss, Ruffy's aggressive style has been highly effective. Future opponents may need to focus on defense, clinch control, cardio, and a high-volume striking strategy to withstand his onslaughts.
James Llontop is a dynamic fighter who uses jabs, kicks, and footwork to control distance and set up counters. However, his last fight against Viacheslav Borshchev exposed some weaknesses:
While Llontop landed effective strikes like a multi-punch combo that stumbled Borshchev, his aggressive approach left him vulnerable. Borshchev was able to control the pace and land precise counters.
To improve, Llontop may need to be more selective with attacks, focus on defensive skills against counters, and adapt his strategy mid-fight. With 14 wins and 4 losses, his style can be effective but has limitations against strategic counter-strikers.
Striking: Ruffy's high-volume, powerful striking could overwhelm Llontop if he's overly aggressive like in the Borshchev fight. Llontop needs to be judicious and mind his defense.
Pace: Ruffy pushes a relentless pace. Llontop must maintain cardio to match it or slow things down with clinches and tactical movement.
Range: Llontop's jab and kicks could help control distance. But in close, Ruffy's swarming combos may do serious damage, especially if Llontop's back hits the cage.
Counters: Llontop has the footwork to set up counters, but he was too eager against Borshchev. Measured counters could catch Ruffy coming in, but James must be defensively responsible and pick his spots carefully.
Here's why the model favors Mauricio Ruffy:
Odds (-900 vs +575): Betting markets strongly favor Ruffy, moving the score by 23 points
Recent Takedowns Attempted (3.19 vs 0): Ruffy is more active with takedown attempts
Recent Win % (91% vs 78%): Ruffy has won more of his recent fights
Significant Striking Impact (+11 vs -3): Ruffy lands much more impactful strikes
TrueSkill Rating (25 vs 24): The model thinks Ruffy is the slightly more skilled fighter overall
Other factors like striking defense, reach, and striking accuracy also slightly favor Ruffy, painting a picture of a dangerous, effective striker who can dictate the fight.
The model has no past predictions for either fighter to analyze.
Mauricio Ruffy is a formidable opponent, an aggressive finisher well-equipped to push the pace and overwhelm James Llontop with powerful striking combinations. Llontop has paths to victory through distance management, well-timed counterpunching, and tactical clinch work, but he must be extremely disciplined, selective, and defensively sound.
One mistake could spell disaster against a prolific knockout artist like Ruffy. The model predicts Ruffy's relentless pressure and striking prowess will be too much, and sees a Ruffy win as the most likely outcome. But as always in MMA, anything can happen once the cage door closes.
Score: 2 Odds: Jonathan Martinez: 114 Marcus McGhee: -146
Jonathan Martinez is a well-rounded fighter known for his adaptability and precision striking. He employs a diverse array of techniques, including calf kicks, body attacks, and punch combinations. Martinez's ability to control the pace of the fight through effective pressure and distance management has been crucial to his success.
However, Martinez has shown vulnerabilities in his takedown defense and occasional lapses in striking defense. Opponents have capitalized on these weaknesses by dragging him into grappling exchanges or catching him with counters during his aggressive striking flurries. Additionally, Martinez's tendency to chase knockouts has sometimes led to him gassing out in later rounds.
Marcus McGhee is an explosive striker with knockout power and a rapidly evolving skill set. His aggressive pace, varied striking arsenal, and improving defensive capabilities make him a formidable opponent. McGhee's ability to mix up his attacks, transitioning seamlessly between punches, kicks, and spinning techniques, keeps his opponents guessing.
McGhee's footwork and movement have been key to his success, allowing him to maintain a high pace while avoiding counters. He has also shown adaptability, adjusting his strategy mid-fight to capitalize on his opponents' weaknesses. However, McGhee's aggressive style can leave openings for disciplined counter-strikers, and his cardio in later rounds is still a question mark.
The model has a mixed track record with these fighters: - For Jonathan Martinez, it has been correct in 4 out of 6 predictions (67% accuracy) - For Marcus McGhee, it has been correct in both of its predictions so far (100% accuracy)
This suggests reasonable confidence in the model's prediction, especially given its perfect record with McGhee. However, the limited data for McGhee adds some uncertainty.
The model's prediction of a Marcus McGhee victory is based on his powerful striking, grappling potential, and the stylistic matchup. However, Jonathan Martinez's technical skills and experience make him a dangerous opponent. Ultimately, the fight may come down to who can impose their game plan and manage the pace. While the model favors McGhee, Martinez certainly has paths to victory through his precise striking and kicks. Expect an exciting, high-level battle between two talented bantamweights looking to climb the ranks.
Score: 6
Odds:
David Onama: -295
Lucas Alexander: 220
David Onama is an extremely well-rounded fighter who couples aggressive striking with solid wrestling and grappling. His striking arsenal is dynamic, featuring precise jabs, effective feints, intercepting knees, and powerful punch combinations. Onama is adept at using feints to close distance and set up his strikes.
One of Onama's standout attributes is his defensive grappling and ability to reverse positions when taken down. Even when put on his back by skilled wrestlers like Jonathan Pearce, Onama showcased excellent defensive awareness to escape bad spots and get back to his feet. His scrambling allows him to keep fights standing where he can utilize his diverse striking.
Onama's killer instinct is another dangerous weapon. When he senses his opponent is hurt, like against Gabriel Benitez, Onama will swarm with a relentless flurry of strikes to secure the finish. However, his aggressiveness can sometimes leave defensive openings that tactically sound opponents like Nate Landwehr have exploited.
Lucas Alexander is a skilled and precise striker. He employs excellent movement, using angles and lateral motion to avoid his opponents' attacks while landing his own shots. Alexander's straight punches, especially his right hand, are fast and accurate.
In addition to crisp boxing, Alexander mixes in effective kicks to the legs and body. Against Jeka Saragih, his low kicks were particularly impactful, compromising Saragih's balance and mobility.
Alexander is also a very defensively sound fighter. He remains composed under pressure, slipping and countering effectively when opponents overextend on their strikes. His takedown defense has looked solid in his UFC tenure thus far.
The main question mark for Alexander is his grappling. In his loss to Joanderson Brito, he was overwhelmed by Brito's aggressive wrestling and grappling onslaught. If opponents can get him down, it's still unclear how effectively Alexander can work from his back.
Striking Matchup: Both men are skilled strikers but in different ways. Expect Onama to press forward aggressively behind his jab and feints, looking to land power shots. Alexander will likely use his footwork to circle, attacking with straight punches and kicks from a distance.
Potential Grappling Exchanges: With his wrestling background, Onama may look to mix in takedowns, especially if he's having trouble closing distance on the feet. Alexander will want to keep this fight standing where he can utilize his technical striking. His takedown defense will be tested.
Cardio and Pace: Onama pushes a high pace and has shown excellent cardio in three round fights. Alexander will need to match that work rate or find ways to slow Onama down and make him hesitant to engage, possibly by countering him hard a few times.
WolfTicketsAI favors David Onama here for a few key reasons:
Striking Power: Onama's Significant Striking Impact Differential of -0.6667 is better than Alexander's 21.0000. This suggests Onama lands the more impactful strikes, which can sway judges and potentially lead to a finish.
Grappling Threat: Onama averages far more Takedowns Attempted per Fight at 3.8155 vs Alexander's 0.8086. Even if these takedowns don't result in extended grappling control, the mere threat of them can make Alexander hesitant to commit to his strikes.
Momentum and Experience: Onama's Recent Win Percentage of 0.67 tops Alexander's 0.33. He's also fought higher level UFC competition than Alexander has. This momentum and experience advantage is meaningful.
The model's predictions have been hit-or-miss on both fighters:
This shaky historical performance adds some uncertainty to the prediction. But based on overall fighter profiles and the metrics advantage for Onama, there's still reason to trust the model here, though not with supreme confidence.
Though a competitive matchup, David Onama appears to have more paths to victory than Lucas Alexander. His aggressive striking, grappling upside, and proven UFC experience make him a justifiable favorite.
However, Alexander's slick technical kickboxing and defensive soundness keep him very live for the upset, especially if he can maintain distance, land counters, and keep the fight standing. If he's improved his grappling since the Joanderson Brito loss, his chances only go up.
Overall, this shapes up as a exciting clash of striking styles with some grappling intrigue. While siding with Onama is reasonable, Alexander has the skills to make this closer than the odds suggest if he can execute his game plan. It's a fight that has high action potential for as long as it lasts.
Score: 2 Odds: Marcin Tybura: -128 Jhonata Diniz: 100
Marcin Tybura is a seasoned veteran in the UFC's heavyweight division, known for his well-rounded skill set and strategic approach to fights. He has consistently demonstrated the ability to adapt his game plan based on his opponent, utilizing his grappling prowess to control the pace and position of the fight.
In recent bouts, Tybura has showcased improved striking accuracy and volume. Against Serghei Spivac, he effectively employed grappling control and ground-and-pound to secure a dominant victory. When facing Tai Tuivasa, Tybura's wrestling and submission skills were on full display as he quickly finished the fight via rear-naked choke.
However, Tybura's most recent fight against Tom Aspinall exposed some vulnerabilities in his defensive striking. Aspinall's speed and precise combinations caught Tybura off guard, leading to a first-round knockout loss. This highlights a potential weakness that opponents may look to exploit.
Despite this setback, Tybura's experience and well-rounded skill set make him a formidable opponent for anyone in the heavyweight division. His ability to control the clinch, secure takedowns, and maintain top position has been a key factor in many of his victories.
Jhonata Diniz is a rising prospect in the UFC's heavyweight division, boasting an undefeated professional record. He has quickly made a name for himself with his aggressive striking style and impressive athleticism.
In his UFC debut against Austen Lane, Diniz showcased his adaptability and resilience. Despite being dominated on the mat in the first round, he made the necessary adjustments and mounted a comeback in the second. Diniz's powerful uppercuts and hooks ultimately led to a knockout victory, demonstrating his finishing ability.
Diniz's most recent fight against Karl Williams further highlighted his striking prowess. He maintained a high pace throughout the bout, landing 4.31 significant strikes per minute compared to Williams' 2.87. Diniz's defensive skills were also on display, as he successfully evaded or blocked many of Williams' attacks.
One area where Diniz may need improvement is his grappling. While he has shown the ability to defend takedowns (80% success rate), his offensive grappling has not been as prominent in his fights. Against high-level grapplers, this could potentially be exploited.
However, Diniz's aggressive striking style, cardio, and ability to adapt mid-fight make him a dangerous opponent for anyone in the division. His undefeated record and impressive performances have quickly established him as a rising contender to watch.
Contrasting Styles: This fight pits Tybura's grappling-heavy approach against Diniz's aggressive striking style. The clash of styles could lead to an intriguing battle for control of the fight.
Tybura's Path to Victory: For Tybura to emerge victorious, he will likely need to utilize his wrestling and clinch work to neutralize Diniz's striking. Securing takedowns and maintaining top control will be crucial.
Diniz's Path to Victory: Diniz's keys to success will be maintaining distance, defending takedowns, and landing powerful strikes. If he can keep the fight standing and maintain a high pace, he could overwhelm Tybura.
Adaptability: Both fighters have shown the ability to adapt mid-fight. Whoever can make the necessary adjustments and impose their game plan will have a significant advantage.
Finishing Ability: Both Tybura and Diniz have demonstrated the ability to finish fights. Tybura's submissions and ground-and-pound have been effective, while Diniz's knockout power has been on full display. One mistake could lead to a sudden end.
WolfTicketsAI's prediction of Jhonata Diniz winning with a score of 2 is based on several key factors:
Odds: The odds slightly favor Marcin Tybura at -128, but this difference is not substantial enough to override other predictive factors.
Recent Performances: While Tybura has more UFC experience, his recent knockout loss to Tom Aspinall exposed defensive vulnerabilities. In contrast, Diniz has looked impressive in his first two UFC fights, showcasing his striking skills and adaptability.
Significant Striking: Diniz holds the edge in recent significant striking output differential (3.6667) and impact differential (13.2000). His ability to maintain a high striking pace while evading his opponents' attacks has been a key factor in his success.
Finishing Ability: Diniz's 1.2594 recent knockdowns per fight ratio is significantly higher than Tybura's 0.0628. This suggests that Diniz's aggressive striking style and knockout power could be a major factor in this fight.
WolfTicketsAI has a mixed track record in predicting fights involving these two competitors:
For Marcin Tybura, the model has been correct in 4 out of 5 predictions, with the only incorrect pick being the Alexandr Romanov fight. This suggests that the model has a good understanding of Tybura's strengths and weaknesses.
For Jhonata Diniz, the model's only prediction was incorrect, picking Karl Williams to win their recent bout. This limited data makes it harder to assess the model's performance for Diniz.
The model's strong track record with Tybura lends some credence to its prediction. However, the incorrect pick for Diniz's last fight suggests that there may be some uncertainty in assessing his abilities.
The heavyweight clash between Marcin Tybura and Jhonata Diniz promises to be an exciting stylistic matchup. Tybura's grappling prowess and experience will be tested against Diniz's aggressive striking and athleticism.
While Tybura's path to victory likely involves utilizing his wrestling and clinch work, Diniz's keys to success will be maintaining distance and landing powerful strikes. Adaptability and finishing ability could also play major roles.
WolfTicketsAI's prediction of Jhonata Diniz winning is based on his impressive recent performances, edge in striking metrics, and knockout power. However, Tybura's experience and grappling skills cannot be overlooked.
Ultimately, this fight may come down to who can impose their game plan and make the necessary mid-fight adjustments. Regardless of the outcome, fans can expect an intriguing and potentially explosive heavyweight battle.
Score: 0 Odds: Mickey Gall: -136 Ramiz Brahimaj: 106
Mickey Gall is known for his aggressive submission-heavy fighting style. He has secured multiple rear-naked choke victories in the UFC, showcasing his elite grappling ability. In his last fight against Bassil Hafez, Gall had moments of success with big counter punches that stunned Hafez, but ultimately struggled with Hafez's speed and ability to mix things up, leading to a unanimous decision loss.
Some concerning trends for Gall: - Lost 3 of his last 4 fights - Tends to fade in later rounds as his cardio gets tested - Susceptible to being controlled against the fence and taken down - Striking defense still needs improvement
However, Gall's mastery of submissions, especially the rear-naked choke, makes him a constant threat. If he can work to his grappling strengths against Brahimaj, he has a path to victory.
Ramiz Brahimaj is a well-rounded fighter with solid grappling and underrated striking. In his last win over Michael Gillmore, he showed how dangerous he can be, securing a 1st round submission victory via rear-naked choke.
Some positive trends for Brahimaj: - Riding a 2-fight win streak - Lands 2.37 significant strikes per minute, higher than Gall's 2.82 - Secures 1.54 takedowns per fight, an advantage over Gall's 1.07 - Better striking defense, absorbing fewer significant strikes per minute
Brahimaj's aggressive wrestling and submission skills make him a stylistic threat to Gall. If he can pressure Gall, secure takedowns, and implement his grappling game, he has a great chance at victory.
Clash of grapplers: Both fighters are skilled grapplers, so the wrestling and scrambles will be crucial. Who can gain top position and control?
Striking dynamics: Brahimaj seems to have the striking advantage on paper with better volume and defense. Can Gall land one of his big counters?
Cardio questions: Gall has faded late in fights before. Brahimaj needs to push a hard pace to test Gall's gas tank.
Adapting to adversity: If Gall gets taken down or pressured, how will he respond? His ability to adapt will be tested.
The model favors Brahimaj to win, and the SHAP data provides insight into why:
Odds: The odds being close actually boost Brahimaj, since he's a slight underdog. Model sees betting value on him.
Recent win percentage: Brahimaj's 2-fight win streak compared to Gall losing 3 of his last 4 is a key factor tilting the scales.
Striking metrics: Brahimaj's superior significant striking volume and defense are predictive of success over Gall's lower output.
Grappling ability: The takedown attempts and submission threat of Brahimaj seem well-suited to exploit Gall's takedown defense liabilities.
The model has limited data on both fighters: - For Gall, it correctly predicted his recent loss to Hafez but with only 58% confidence. - For Brahimaj, it's 2-0 in predictions, forecasting his win over Gillmore and loss to McGee.
The small sample sizes add uncertainty, but the model has performed decently so far when picking these fighters. However, bet with caution given the limited data.
This is a close matchup between two skilled grapplers. Gall's submission expertise makes him live for a finish, but Brahimaj's wrestling, volume striking, and cardio could prove the difference if he implements his game.
WolfTicketsAI predicts a Ramiz Brahimaj win, seeing value in the underdog here based on the recent trends and stylistic matchup. However, with limited prediction data on both fighters, this is a tough one to call with high confidence. The grappling exchanges and scrambles will likely tell the tale.
Score: 16
Odds:
Bassil Hafez: +152
Oban Elliott: -196
Bassil Hafez brings a relentless, wrestling-heavy style to the Octagon, relying on forward pressure, high takedown attempts (12.5 per fight), and adaptability in striking. His standout performance against Mickey Gall highlighted his persistence under pressure; Hafez kept Gall on his back foot with consistent leg kicks, powerful clinch work, and an aggressive striking volume that overwhelmed his opponent. Despite this, Hafez took significant damage, a common theme in his fights, as shown by his high rate of absorbed head strikes (4.17 per minute). Hafez’s grappling, while dominant, can at times lead to mistakes, such as his reliance on guillotine chokes, which allowed Jack Della Maddalena to regain control and land body shots that eventually fatigued Hafez.
Hafez’s recent record in the UFC—1-1 with a split decision loss and a close win—highlights both his tenacity and the gaps in his game, particularly his susceptibility to getting hit. His lower striking defense (33.7%) and his need to constantly grapple may put him at risk if he faces a more precise striker who can capitalize on defensive lapses. Hafez’s limited striking accuracy (42.5%) also suggests he may struggle to land clean shots against a disciplined opponent like Elliott.
Oban Elliott, known for his nickname "The Welsh Gangster," offers a high-volume striking game combined with adaptability in stance-switching, keeping opponents guessing. His recent unanimous decision win over Preston Parsons showcased Elliott’s ability to dictate pace, with an impressive striking rate (4.27 significant strikes landed per minute at 53% accuracy) and a knack for fending off takedown attempts. Elliott’s defensive grappling—though not elite—proved sufficient to stymie Parsons’ attempts, underscoring Elliott's strength in maintaining control on the feet.
Against Val Woodburn, Elliott’s strategy of pushing the pace with frequent combinations and forcing his opponent against the cage demonstrated his proficiency in controlling octagon space. He landed a staggering 136 strikes, overwhelming Woodburn and exposing gaps in his defense. Elliott’s performance illustrates a well-rounded striking attack that could expose Hafez’s defensive vulnerabilities, especially given Hafez’s tendency to absorb damage while pursuing takedowns.
WolfTicketsAI has predicted Elliott’s previous fight correctly, accurately calling his win over Preston Parsons. However, it previously predicted a win for Mickey Gall over Hafez, which was incorrect as Hafez pulled out a unanimous decision. This discrepancy suggests a risk factor in predicting Hafez's performance, given his ability to surprise with resilience and pressure.
This fight leans toward Elliott, whose high-output, adaptable striking game matches well against Hafez's grappling-heavy approach. While Hafez’s relentless takedowns could present challenges, Elliott’s defensive resilience and precision striking are likely to create openings as Hafez’s cardio depletes. Expect Elliott to control the pace, utilize his stance-switching to exploit Hafez’s defense, and look for a decision victory unless Hafez’s wrestling proves overwhelming early on.
Score: 5
Odds:
- Veronica Hardy: -164
- Eduarda Moura: +128
Veronica Hardy brings a well-rounded skill set, adept in both striking and grappling. Her experience and recent record highlight her strategic adaptability, evident in her last fight against JJ Aldrich, where Hardy used effective jabs and leg kicks to control distance and stave off Aldrich's attempts at close-range combat. Hardy’s clinch work and ability to evade takedowns showcase her defensive acumen. Her southpaw stance and sharp angles create openings, while her grappling and clinch control have become assets in neutralizing opponents with strong takedown threats.
A crucial point in Hardy’s trajectory is her evolution in striking defense, which she displayed in her unanimous decision win against Jamey-Lyn Horth. Hardy’s tendency to use volume striking instead of searching for a knockout allows her to maintain a steady pace. However, her loss to grappler Gillian Robertson exposed some weaknesses in submission defense, suggesting that she may struggle against fighters who excel at maintaining pressure on the ground. In her fight history, Hardy has experienced a knockout, which, while in the distant past, is still worth noting as an area of potential risk under significant pressure.
Eduarda Moura is a dynamic striker with a high-volume approach that pressures opponents from the outset. Known for her striking accuracy, she demonstrated this skill against Montserrat Conejo Ruiz, where Moura’s precision helped secure a TKO. Despite her loss to Denise Gomes, where her takedown defense faltered under pressure, Moura’s adaptability allowed her to shift to grappling and recover control. Moura's stats highlight her proficiency in head strikes and significant strikes, though her striking defense remains a vulnerability.
Grappling-wise, Moura attempts a high volume of takedowns, but her success rate suggests she may struggle against opponents with good takedown defense. Her recent performance against Gomes revealed her limitations under sustained aggression, where she struggled to counteract Gomes’ resilience. Moura’s aggression can sometimes lead to openings for counterattacks, a potential weakness that Hardy, with her disciplined approach, could exploit.
This matchup pits Hardy’s defensive and strategic prowess against Moura’s aggressive striking. WolfTicketsAI’s prediction of Hardy as the victor leans on her experience, adaptability, and ability to exploit Moura’s defensive lapses. Moura will need to overcome her tendency to leave openings, particularly if Hardy establishes an effective rhythm with jabs and leg kicks early on. Hardy’s endurance and track record of adapting mid-fight position her well to capitalize on Moura’s weaknesses, especially if the fight extends to later rounds.