WTAI Model | Profit Model | Plain Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full | Main | Under | Full | Main | Under | Full |
50.0% | 83.33% | 70.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 83.33% | 80.0% |
WTAI Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
50.0% | 83.33% | 70.0% |
Profit Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% |
Plain Model | ||
---|---|---|
Main | Under | Full |
75.0% | 83.33% | 80.0% |
The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.
Score: 27
Odds:
Alex Pereira: -520
Khalil Rountree Jr.: 350
Alex Pereira is a striking phenom who has taken the MMA world by storm since transitioning from kickboxing. His powerful left hook and precise striking have led him to an impressive 6-1 UFC record, including wins over Israel Adesanya and Jiri Prochazka to claim and defend the light heavyweight title.
Pereira's kickboxing pedigree is evident in his fights. He utilizes a wide stance that allows him to generate immense power, especially with his left hook. In his last fight against Prochazka, Pereira showcased his ability to throw this hook while both advancing and retreating. He set it up beautifully with feints and calf kicks that compromised Prochazka's movement before landing the fight-ending blow.
While primarily a striker, Pereira has shown steady improvements in his grappling under the tutelage of Glover Teixeira. However, this remains an area where skilled grapplers could potentially exploit him. Cardio has also been a question in some of his fights that have gone into the later rounds.
Khalil Rountree Jr. is a dynamic Muay Thai striker who has been on an impressive run in the UFC's light heavyweight division. He's won 4 of his last 5, all by knockout, showcasing his devastating power and improved fight IQ.
Rountree's striking style is characterized by heavy kicks and a commitment to traditional Thai techniques in the clinch. In his recent fights, he's shown a more patient approach, using feints and a sharp counter right hook to disrupt his opponents' rhythm before unleashing his full arsensal.
Against Anthony Smith, Rountree's calf kicks and clinch work were key in wearing down his opponent before he found the opening for a fight-ending combination in the third round. His ability to maintain composure under pressure and his improved cardio were also evident in this fight.
However, Rountree's grappling remains a question mark. Skilled wrestlers could look to exploit this and take him out of his striking comfort zone. His 2 UFC losses have come by submission.
WolfTicketsAI slightly favors Alex Pereira in this matchup, likely due to:
Odds: The betting odds significantly favor Pereira at -520 compared to Rountree at +350. The model seems to weigh this heavily.
Striking power: Pereira's KO power, especially his left hook, is a game-changer. His significant_striking_impact_differential
of 16.5556 is notably higher than Rountree's -2.6667.
Recent form: Pereira is on an meteoric rise with key wins over elite competition. His recent_win_perc
of 100% edges Rountree's 80%.
However, there are factors that add intrigue and could favor Rountree:
Striking accuracy: Rountree actually has a higher significant_striking_accuracy
at 39.46% compared to Pereira's 37.59%. If he can maintain distance and land at a high clip, he could frustrate Pereira.
Reach: Rountree will have a 3-inch reach advantage. If he can utilize this to keep Pereira at the end of his strikes, it could be pivotal.
So while the odds and impact metrics favor Pereira, Rountree's precision and reach make him a live underdog. This truly is a pick'em fight between two elite strikers.
The model's past performance adds confidence but also intrigue to this prediction:
This context suggests reasonable trust in the Pereira pick, but emphasizes how competitive this fight is. Rountree's upset potential is very real.
In conclusion, while Alex Pereira is a justifiable favorite, Khalil Rountree Jr. is a dangerous underdog. Pereira's power and grappling improvements serve him well, but Rountree's technical striking and increased poise make him a constant threat.
The prudent pick aligns with WolfTicketsAI in favoring Pereira, but Rountree's momentum and stylistic matchup make this closer to a coin flip than the odds suggest. Regardless of outcome, fans can expect an explosive standup battle for as long as this one lasts. This is a high-level striker's delight and a matchup befitting of marquee status.
Score: 14 Odds: Raquel Pennington: -180 Julianna Pena: 140
Raquel Pennington is a seasoned veteran in the UFC Women's Bantamweight division, known for her gritty fighting style and resilience. Her approach revolves around a high-pressure game plan, where she utilizes her wrestling background and clinch work to wear down opponents. Pennington's striking may not be the most technical, but she effectively mixes it with her grappling to maintain a relentless pace.
In her recent fights, Pennington has shown improvements in her striking defense and cardio management. Against Mayra Bueno Silva, she employed a smart strategy of using kicks to close distance, followed by controlling Silva in the clinch. This allowed her to neutralize Silva's reach advantage and secure a unanimous decision victory.
Pennington's submission win over Macy Chiasson further highlighted her well-rounded skill set. She used kicks to set up entries into the clinch, where she imposed her will. The fight-ending sequence showcased her ability to seamlessly transition from striking to grappling, catching Chiasson with a knee to the body and swiftly sinking in a guillotine choke.
With her high-volume striking approach and strong clinch game, Pennington presents a difficult stylistic matchup for many fighters in the division. Her conditioning allows her to maintain a grueling pace, and her opportunistic grappling makes her a constant threat.
Julianna Pena is an aggressive fighter with a straightforward approach. She relies on constant forward pressure, utilizing a high-volume striking attack combined with a threatening grappling game. Despite technical limitations in her striking, particularly in boxing mechanics, Pena's tenacity and durability enable her to drag opponents into grind-it-out fights.
Pena's most notable performance came in her first fight against Amanda Nunes, where she pulled off a stunning upset. Pena employed a simple but effective strategy of relentlessly pressing forward with one-two combinations and basic head movement. Her "wine mum boxing" style, while unorthodox, allowed her to outwork Nunes and eventually secure a submission victory.
However, the rematch against Nunes exposed some of Pena's vulnerabilities. Nunes made strategic adjustments, such as switching to southpaw, which neutralized Pena's go-to dipping jab. Nunes' use of counter right hooks and high kicks exploited Pena's rudimentary striking defense. This highlighted the importance of tactical adaptability, an area where Pena has room for improvement.
Despite these shortcomings, Pena's strength lies in her indomitable spirit and grappling prowess. She possesses a dangerous submission threat, even from inferior positions, as demonstrated in her wins over Sara McMann and Jessica Eye. Pena's ability to weather storms and find a way to win makes her a formidable opponent.
Raquel Pennington and Julianna Pena have not previously fought each other in the UFC.
Stylistic Matchup: This fight pits Pennington's high-pressure wrestling and clinch game against Pena's aggressive striking and submission threats. The clash of styles could lead to intriguing grappling exchanges and scrambles.
Striking Dynamics: While both fighters have shown improvements in their striking, neither is considered a technical striker. Pennington's recent performances have showcased better defensive responsibility and a more measured approach. Pena, on the other hand, relies heavily on her one-two combinations and forward pressure. Pennington's ability to mix in kicks and control range could be a key factor.
Grappling Exchanges: Both fighters are skilled grapplers with dangerous submission games. Pennington's wrestling background allows her to dictate where the fight takes place, while Pena is adept at attacking with submissions from various positions. The fighter who can establish control on the ground may gain a significant advantage.
Cardio and Conditioning: Pennington's high-pressure style demands excellent cardio, and she has shown the ability to maintain a strong pace throughout a fight. Pena's relentless aggression also requires good conditioning. The fighter who can sustain their output and pace in the later rounds may have the edge.
WolfTicketsAI's prediction favors Raquel Pennington to win this fight. Let's examine the key factors contributing to this assessment:
Recent Win Percentage: Pennington's recent win percentage is significantly higher than Pena's (100% vs. 67%). This suggests that Pennington has been more successful in her recent outings, which could be an indicator of her current form and momentum.
Striking Defense Percentage: Pennington holds a notable advantage in striking defense percentage (56.17% vs. 44.36%). This indicates that Pennington is more adept at avoiding significant strikes, which could be crucial against Pena's high-volume striking approach.
Striking Accuracy: Pennington also edges out Pena in recent striking accuracy (64.47% vs. 73.28%). While both fighters are not known for their technical striking, Pennington's higher accuracy suggests she may be more efficient with her strikes.
Takedowns Attempted per Fight: Pennington attempts more takedowns per fight compared to Pena (3.7494 vs. 4.6001). This aligns with her wrestling-heavy approach and could be a key factor in controlling the fight's location.
Significant Striking Impact Differential: Pennington has a higher significant striking impact differential (11.4411 vs. 13.8386). This metric indicates the difference between significant strikes landed and absorbed, suggesting that Pennington lands more impactful strikes than she receives compared to Pena.
The model has made three previous predictions for Raquel Pennington, correctly predicting all three of her wins against Mayra Bueno Silva, Ketlen Vieira, and Aspen Ladd. This track record suggests the model has a good understanding of Pennington's strengths and fighting style.
On the other hand, the model has only one previous prediction for Julianna Pena, correctly forecasting her loss to Amanda Nunes in their rematch. While the sample size is limited, the model's assessment of Pena's weaknesses against a well-prepared opponent was accurate.
The discrepancy in the model's prediction history for the two fighters introduces some uncertainty. The limited data on Pena's performance could be seen as a risk factor, as the model has less information to draw upon. However, the model's consistent success in predicting Pennington's fights lends credence to its current assessment.
In conclusion, the WolfTicketsAI model predicts Raquel Pennington to win against Julianna Pena, citing factors such as recent win percentage, striking defense, and takedown attempts. Pennington's well-rounded skill set, high-pressure approach, and proven track record make her a formidable opponent. While Pena's aggression and submission threats cannot be overlooked, her technical limitations and the model's past performance suggest Pennington has the edge.
However, it's essential to consider the limited prediction history for Pena, which introduces some uncertainty. As with any model prediction, unforeseen factors and the inherent unpredictability of MMA could influence the fight's outcome. Nonetheless, based on the available data and the model's analysis, Raquel Pennington is favored to emerge victorious in this highly anticipated Women's Bantamweight clash.
Score: 13
Odds:
Jose Aldo: 114
Mario Bautista: -148
Jose Aldo is a legendary fighter known for his lethal leg kicks, lightning fast hand speed, and exceptional takedown defense. Some of Aldo's signature techniques include:
However, Aldo has shown some vulnerabilities in recent years. His cardio has been questioned in longer 5 round fights. And he's been knocked out in 3 of his last 7 fights, including brutal KO losses to Max Holloway and Petr Yan.
At age 36 and with a lot of battle mileage, there are question marks about how much Aldo has left in the tank. That said, his technical skills are still phenomenal and he remains a crafty, dangerous veteran.
Mario Bautista is a well-rounded fighter on the rise in the UFC's bantamweight division. The 29-year-old has won 5 of his last 6 fights, with his only loss coming to current top contender Merab Dvalishvili.
Bautista has a dynamic, varied attack on the feet. He throws crisp boxing combinations, hard low kicks, and has excellent knees and elbows in close. His striking has steadily improved fight over fight.
Even more impressive is Bautista's grappling. He's a strong wrestler with tight chain wrestling skills. He tends to dominate opponents on the mat with smothering top pressure and slick guard passes.
In his last fight against Ricky Simon, Bautista showed excellent poise and fight IQ. He used perfectly timed knees to punish Simon's constant level changes and neutralized the wrestling threat. On the mat, Bautista's elbow escape from front headlock was a thing of beauty.
Bautista's well-rounded skill set, cardio, and improving fight-to-fight make him a dangerous rising contender. However, he hasn't faced an elite striker of Aldo's caliber yet.
This is a classic matchup of a rising prospect vs a battle-tested veteran legend. Aldo's technical brilliance and wealth of championship experience against Bautista's youthful dynamism and well-rounded attack.
Aldo likely has the striking advantage, especially early. His defensive wizardry, lightning quick counters, and brutal leg kicks could pose problems for Bautista.
However, Bautista's busy striking output, strong chin, and constant pressure could wear on Aldo as the fight goes on, especially if those famous leg kicks don't deter him.
Bautista should have the wrestling and grappling edge. If he can get Aldo down, his smothering top game and submission skills could be a real x-factor.
The big question is Aldo's durability and cardio at age 36. He's absorbed a lot of damage over the years and has been knocked out brutally multiple times. If Bautista can push a high pace for 3 rounds, how will Aldo hold up?
Here are some key factors driving the WolfTicketsAI prediction:
Recent Win Percentage: Bautista has won 100% of his last 5 fights compared to just 67% for Aldo. This is a major factor increasing Bautista's win probability.
Recent Striking Metrics: Bautista has the edge in both striking output and striking efficiency in recent fights:
Grappling: Bautista's strong takedown game (2.89 takedowns per fight, 60% accuracy) compared to Aldo's limited offensive wrestling (0.61 takedowns per fight) is seen as an advantage by the model.
Age/Damage: At age 36 with 40 pro fights and 3 KO losses in his last 7 bouts, the model sees the odometer starting to catch up with Aldo.
So in summary, the model favors the younger, busier, more well-rounded fighter in Bautista who also appears to be improving rapidly. But Aldo's technical brilliance and vast edge in experience keep it competitive.
The WolfTicketsAI model has a fairly limited history predicting these two fighters:
For Jose Aldo, the model has only made predictions on his last 2 fights, going 1-1. It correctly predicted his loss to Merab Dvalishvili but incorrectly picked him to lose to Jonathan Martinez last time out.
For Mario Bautista, the model has been more active, predicting his last 5 fights. Here it has a strong 4-1 record, correctly predicting wins over Guido Cannetti, Benito Lopez, Brian Kelleher, and Da'mon Blackshear. The lone loss was picking Ricky Simon to beat Bautista.
Given the small sample sizes, especially for Aldo, and a few surprising results like the Martinez fight, I wouldn't put too much stock in the past predictions here. The model prediction for this particular matchup should be viewed cautiously.
This is an excellent matchup between a tested legend and a dynamic rising prospect. Aldo's technical striking vs Bautista's pace and grappling is a compelling clash of styles.
The WolfTicketsAI model sees value on Mario Bautista as a moderate favorite, driven by his youth, activity, diverse attack, and strong recent performances. Bautista's wrestling and submission skills in particular are seen as potential difference-makers.
However, Aldo is still a phenomenally skilled striker and one of the greatest fighters of all-time. If the old Aldo shows up on fight night with his laser-like jab and withering leg kicks, he is more than capable of having a vintage performance. Questions about his durability and gas tank are the main concerns.
Score: 4 Odds: Roman Dolidze: +132 Kevin Holland: -170
Roman Dolidze is a versatile fighter known for his creative grappling techniques and powerful striking. He often looks to pressure opponents against the cage and attempts complex submissions like leg locks. His striking is confident and powerful, but can become less effective if his confidence is shaken.
In his recent loss to Nassourdine Imavov, Dolidze struggled with Imavov's striking and defensive wrestling. Imavov maintained distance using front kicks and clinch knees, negating Dolidze's grappling threats. This exposed weaknesses in Dolidze's ability to adapt when his primary tools are neutralized.
However, Dolidze has also shown moments of brilliance, like his clinical finish of Kyle Daukaus. His well-timed hook off the clinch break followed by a precise knee demonstrated his striking prowess and fight IQ.
Overall, Dolidze excels in grappling-centric fights but struggles more against strategic strikers who can keep the fight standing. His 33% recent win percentage suggests he's facing adversity against the division's elite.
Kevin Holland is one of the most dynamic and entertaining strikers in the UFC. His length, unorthodox techniques, and fluid combinations make him a difficult puzzle to solve. Holland's aggressive style is enhanced by creative tools like his use of a backfist off a caught kick against Santiago Ponzinibbio.
However, Holland's weaknesses have been exposed by high-level grapplers. Losses to Khamzat Chimaev, Derek Brunson and Marvin Vettori highlighted his vulnerability to wrestling-heavy game plans. Though he's made strides in his takedown defense, it remains an area that opponents look to exploit.
Despite these challenges, Holland's wins over Ponzinibbio and Alex Oliveira showcased his striking talent and improved grappling. His quick adaptation in submitting Tim Means demonstrated growth in his overall MMA game.
Holland's entertaining style occasionally leaves him hittable, which cost him against precise strikers like Stephen Thompson. But his length, power, and unorthodox attacks still make him a formidable challenge for most opponents.
The model slightly favors Kevin Holland here for a few key reasons:
However, some factors do favor Dolidze:
Ultimately, the model sees Holland's striking advantages, recent form, and physical dimensions as more predictive than Dolidze's grappling threat. But it still projects a competitive fight.
For Roman Dolidze, the model has been correct on 4 of its last 6 predictions (67% accuracy), but it incorrectly expected him to lose his previous two contests. Coming in off two wins, there is a bit more uncertainty than usual here.
Meanwhile, for Kevin Holland, the model has only been correct on 1 of its last 5 picks (25% accuracy) and incorrectly projected him to beat two dangerous strikers in Stephen Thompson and Michael Page. This makes trusting the Holland side prediction a bit risky.
With both fighters having some predictive uncertainty around them, this shapes up as a difficult fight to project and bet on. Larger sample sizes of recent fights would increase confidence.
Overall, the clash of Roman Dolidze and Kevin Holland projects as an entertaining stylistic matchup between two well-rounded fighters. The model sees Holland's slick striking and improving ground game as a more reliable path to victory than Dolidze's grappling-centric approach.
However, with both fighters showing some inconsistency lately, an upset would not be shocking. Dolidze certainly has a path to victory if he can take Holland down and utilize his unique submission skills. But Holland's takedown defense is trending upwards and his striking arsenal is a constant threat.
In a competitive fight, the model sides with Holland's length, power, and higher work rate to earn a decision victory or late stoppage. But with predictive uncertainty around both men, this is a fight to watch closely and look for value in live betting markets, rather than a strong pre-fight position. The technical and tactical elements will be fascinating to track from the opening bell.
Score: 17 Odds: Stephen Thompson: 162 Joaquin Buckley: -210
Stephen "Wonderboy" Thompson is renowned for his karate-based striking style, characterized by a wide stance, constant motion, and a dynamic kicking game. His deceptive setups and excellent distance management have been key to his success in the UFC.
However, Thompson's recent performances have exposed vulnerabilities in his defensive wrestling and ability to manage pressure. In his loss to Shavkat Rakhmonov, he struggled to maintain distance and succumbed to a submission, highlighting potential issues against aggressive grapplers.
To succeed against Buckley, Thompson must effectively utilize his sidekicks and counterstriking to control range. If he can avoid Buckley's explosive entries and keep the fight in open space, his technical striking could secure a decision victory.
Yet, Thompson's recent record (2-3 in his last 5) and the model's inaccurate predictions in his last two fights introduce uncertainty about his current form and ability to execute his game plan.
Joaquin Buckley, a freestyle fighter with a well-rounded skill set, has been making waves in the UFC with his explosive athleticism and knockout power. Despite a recent loss to the crafty Chris Curtis, Buckley has shown improvement in his striking technique and combinations.
Buckley's path to victory against Thompson likely involves closing the distance, utilizing clinch work to disrupt Thompson's rhythm, and landing power shots in the pocket. His explosive entries and improving wrestling could be crucial in neutralizing Thompson's striking prowess.
While wrestling isn't Buckley's primary strength, Thompson's recent struggles against grapplers suggest it could be a viable strategy. Additionally, Buckley's 4-fight win streak and the model's accuracy in predicting his last two victories lend credence to his current form and stylistic advantages in this matchup.
Contrasting Styles: Thompson's technical karate-based striking clashes with Buckley's explosive power and improving all-around game. The fighter who can dictate range and pace will likely emerge victorious.
Thompson's Defensive Concerns: Recent fights have highlighted Thompson's vulnerabilities against pressure and wrestling-heavy approaches. This could be a significant factor against Buckley's aggressive style.
Buckley's Diverse Skill Set: Buckley's improving striking combinations and ability to mix in wrestling attempts have added depth to his game. This versatility could be key in neutralizing Thompson's striking and wearing him down.
Cardio Considerations: Thompson has suggested Buckley's muscular build might lead to fatigue in later rounds. If the fight goes the distance, Thompson's more fluid style and cardio could come into play.
Several key metrics underscore the model's prediction of a Buckley victory:
Recent Win Percentage: Buckley's perfect 4-0 record in his last 4 fights, juxtaposed with Thompson's 1-2 record in his last 3, likely plays a significant role in the model's assessment.
Striking Defense: Buckley's superior Recent Significant Striking Defense Percentage (64.02% vs 50.85%) suggests he may be better equipped to avoid damage in exchanges.
Grappling Metrics: Buckley's advantage in Recent Takedowns Attempted per Fight (4.31 vs 0.58) and Takedowns Landed per Fight (1.69 vs 0.24) points to a potentially decisive grappling edge against a striking-oriented fighter like Thompson.
The model's mixed track record with Stephen Thompson's recent fights, including an incorrect loss prediction against Kevin Holland, suggests some uncertainty in gauging his current form and stylistic matchups.
Conversely, the model's accuracy in predicting Joaquin Buckley's last two victories over Alex Morono and Nursulton Ruziboev bolsters confidence in its assessment of his current trajectory and skill set.
Despite Stephen Thompson's pedigree and technical striking prowess, the model's pick of Joaquin Buckley appears well-reasoned. Buckley's powerful striking, aggressive pressure, and evolving all-around game seem well-suited to exploit the defensive vulnerabilities Thompson has exhibited recently.
However, Thompson's ability to manage distance and counter effectively could be pivotal if he can keep the fight in his preferred range. Ultimately, the fighter who can impose their game plan and capitalize on their opponent's weaknesses will likely have their hand raised.
The model's conviction in a Buckley win, supported by his recent performances and advantageous style matchup, makes this a compelling prediction.
Score: 11 Odds: Marina Rodriguez: 148 Iasmin Lucindo: -192
Marina Rodriguez is a dynamic striker known for her exceptional Muay Thai skills, holding a dark blue belt with a black tip in the discipline. She also has a purple belt in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, giving her a solid grappling base. However, her primary strength lies in controlling the pace of fights from a distance using precise jabs, powerful leg kicks, and effective clinch work.
Rodriguez's recent split decision loss to Jéssica Andrade at UFC 300 may have exposed some vulnerabilities in her game, particularly against strong wrestlers who can pressure her. While she bounced back with a TKO victory over Michelle Waterson-Gomez in September 2023, questions remain about her ability to consistently beat top-tier opponents.
To succeed against Lucindo, Rodriguez will need to utilize her technical striking to maintain distance and avoid getting drawn into grappling exchanges. Her defensive grappling will be crucial in keeping the fight standing where she holds the advantage.
Iasmin Lucindo, the third-youngest fighter on the UFC roster, is a promising prospect with a well-rounded skill set. She combines solid striking fundamentals with aggressive pace and pressure. Her recent submission victory over Polyana Viana showcased her improving ground skills and opportunistic finishing ability.
Lucindo's youth and athleticism could pose problems for Rodriguez, especially if she can close the distance and force grappling exchanges. With 8 KOs and 3 submissions on her record, Lucindo has shown the ability to finish fights both on the feet and on the ground.
However, Lucindo's relative inexperience against top-tier competition is a question mark. She may struggle with Rodriguez's technical striking and veteran savvy. To win, Lucindo will need to effectively pressure Rodriguez, cut off the cage, and potentially take the fight to the ground where she might have an advantage.
Clash of Styles: This fight pits Rodriguez's technical Muay Thai against Lucindo's aggressive, well-rounded game. The contrast in styles and experience levels makes for an intriguing matchup.
Grappling Dynamics: Lucindo's path to victory likely involves taking Rodriguez down and utilizing her submission skills. However, Rodriguez's defensive grappling and ability to get back to her feet could negate this advantage.
Striking Battle: On the feet, Rodriguez holds the edge with her precise striking and ability to control range. Lucindo will need to close distance and land power shots to have success in striking exchanges.
Pace and Pressure: Lucindo's aggressive style and high pace could pose problems for Rodriguez, especially in later rounds. Rodriguez will need to manage the pace and avoid getting drawn into prolonged grappling exchanges.
Odds: The betting odds heavily favor Lucindo, suggesting that the market sees value in her youth, finishing ability, and aggressive style.
Recent Performances: Lucindo's recent submission win and Rodriguez's split decision loss could be influencing the model's prediction. It may be identifying potential vulnerabilities in Rodriguez's game that Lucindo could exploit.
Striking and Grappling Stats: The model likely sees Lucindo's advantages in grappling stats and striking defense as key factors. If she can nullify Rodriguez's striking with clinch work and takedowns, she has a clear path to victory.
The model's inaccuracy in predicting Rodriguez's recent fights suggests that there may be vulnerabilities in her game that it's struggling to account for. Her losses to wrestlers and grapplers could be a red flag.
Conversely, the model's perfect record in predicting Lucindo's fights, albeit with a small sample size, indicates that her style and skills might be well-suited to the model's evaluation criteria.
This fight represents a fascinating stylistic matchup between a seasoned technical striker and a young, aggressive finisher. The model's prediction and betting odds favor Lucindo, likely based on her grappling skills, well-rounded game, and recent performances.
However, counting out Rodriguez would be a mistake. Her technical Muay Thai and ability to control range could be the keys to victory if she can keep the fight standing. Her experience and proven ability to beat high-level strikers keep her very much in this fight.
Ultimately, the outcome may hinge on whether Lucindo can effectively pressure Rodriguez, close the distance, and turn this into a grappling match. If she can, her youth and submission skills could carry her to a career-defining victory. But if Rodriguez can maintain distance and punish Lucindo with strikes, her veteran savvy could prove decisive.
No matter the result, this fight promises to be a compelling clash of styles with significant implications for the strawweight division. Lucindo has the opportunity to announce herself as a serious contender, while Rodriguez looks to cement her status as one of the division's best strikers.
Score: 21 Odds: Cesar Almeida: -400 Ihor Potieria: 285
Cesar Almeida, a former professional kickboxer, brings a diverse striking arsenal to his MMA game. His precise combinations, powerful kicks, and even a victory over current UFC light heavyweight champion Alex Pereira in kickboxing highlight his stand-up prowess.
While he employs some flashy techniques like shoulder rolling, Almeida has adapted his style for MMA by improving his defensive awareness to account for takedowns and head kicks. He has also shown surprising competence in grappling situations, demonstrating solid positional awareness and effective ground striking.
In his recent fight against Dylan Budka, Almeida showcased his resilience and adaptability. Despite being taken down five times in the first round, he repeatedly worked back to his feet without absorbing significant damage. Capitalizing on Budka's fatigue, Almeida secured a TKO victory in the second round, earning a $50,000 bonus.
This performance highlighted Almeida's cardio, situational awareness, and ability to weather early storms before turning the tables with slick striking. While he did suffer a split decision loss to Roman Kopylov in his most recent bout, Almeida's overall UFC success rate remains an impressive 83%.
Ihor "The Duelist" Potieria is known for his technical, calculated approach to striking. He utilizes sharp jabs, powerful kicks, and well-timed combinations to keep opponents at bay, aided by footwork that allows him to maintain distance and control the fight's pace.
Potieria excels at reading opponents' movements and exploiting openings with composed counterpunches. This style allows him to conserve energy while maximizing impact. He has also shown improvements in his grappling, with good takedown defense and the ability to control opponents on the ground.
However, Potieria's recent move down to middleweight has yielded mixed results. After debuting in the division with a win over Robert Bryczek, he suffered a first-round submission loss to Michel Pereira at UFC 301. This setback, following two straight KO/TKO losses at light heavyweight, may have exposed vulnerabilities in his grappling defense and raised questions about his ability to compete at the highest level.
Despite an overall 77% win rate, Potieria has lost 2 of his last 3 fights and been finished in his last 3 losses. At 36 years old, his capacity to evolve and shore up weaknesses remains uncertain. His tendency to overcommit to strikes leaves him open to counters, and his cardio has been suspect in prolonged, high-paced fights.
N/A
Striking Pedigrees: Both fighters come from striking backgrounds, making this a potentially striking-heavy affair. Almeida's kickboxing experience, including a win over the current UFC LHW champ, could give him a technical edge. However, Potieria's precision striking and counterpunching could pose challenges if Almeida overcommits.
Grappling as X-Factor: While primarily strikers, both have shown grappling improvements. Almeida's competence and Potieria's recent submission loss could impact their strategies. Potieria might look to test Almeida's ground game, while Almeida could exploit Potieria's potential defensive vulnerabilities.
Cardio Concerns: Both fighters have faced cardio issues, but Potieria seems to fade more noticeably in deep waters. Almeida's superior cardio management could prove pivotal, especially if he weathers Potieria's early storm.
Momentum vs Experience: Almeida rides the momentum of an impressive UFC debut, while Potieria aims to rebound from a tough loss. However, Potieria's UFC experience against high-level competition could be valuable. The mental aspect will be crucial.
Key factors favoring Cesar Almeida:
Striking Impact Differential: Almeida's 60.5 vs Potieria's 0.5 suggests Almeida lands much harder, more impactful strikes.
Significant Striking Defense Percentage: Almeida's 0.4474 edges Potieria's 0.5273, indicating he absorbs proportionally fewer damaging strikes.
Striking Defense Percentage: Almeida absorbs fewer strikes overall relative to his output (0.3600 vs 0.4868).
Recent Win Percentage: Despite his last loss, Almeida holds a stronger 33% recent win percentage compared to Potieria's concerning 33% across their last 3 fights.
For Cesar Almeida: - WolfTickets incorrectly predicted a win over Roman Kopylov (lost by split decision).
For Ihor Potieria: - The model has gone 3 for 3 recently, correctly predicting losses to Michel Pereira and Carlos Ulberg alongside a win over Mauricio Rua.
The model's shaky recent performance on Almeida adds some uncertainty, but its accuracy on Potieria lends confidence to the Almeida prediction.
Despite the intrigue of this striker vs striker matchup, Cesar Almeida emerges as the rightful favorite over Ihor Potieria. His pronounced edges in striking impact and defense, combined with seemingly superior cardio, tip the scales in his favor. If he can weather Potieria's early storm, Almeida's more refined striking and gas tank should guide him to a mid/late finish or clear decision.
For Potieria to flip the script, he likely needs to close distance immediately, force grappling exchanges, and make Almeida work hard early. Landing fight-altering strikes in the first round or managing to overwhelm Almeida with volume will be crucial. However, his cardio and defensive wrestling deficiencies suggest a narrow path to victory.
Almeida winning via accumulation finish after a competitive first round seems a probable outcome. The pick is Cesar Almeida, but his recent loss and Potieria's dangerous counterpunching make it a riskier proposition than the odds imply. Both fighters' striking skills promise an exciting battle while it lasts.
Score: 14 Odds: Ryan Spann: -340 Ovince Saint Preux: 250
Ryan "Superman" Spann enters this bout with a reputation for versatility and finishing ability. Standing at 6'5", Spann's reach advantage is a significant factor in his striking game. His primary weapons include a powerful right hand and a dangerous guillotine choke, with 12 of his 21 wins coming by submission.
Spann's recent performances have been a mixed bag. His first-round knockout of Dominick Reyes in November 2022 showcased his explosive power. However, his submission loss to Nikita Krylov in March 2023 exposed vulnerabilities in his ground game, an area Saint Preux might look to exploit.
Spann's improving takedown defense and ground control have been evident, but consistency remains a challenge. His aggressive style can leave openings for counter-strikes, as seen in past losses.
Ovince "OSP" Saint Preux brings a wealth of experience and an unorthodox style to this matchup. His signature move, the Von Flue choke (now often called the "Von Preux" choke due to his success with it), remains a constant threat.
OSP's striking arsenal is diverse, featuring powerful kicks and knees alongside unpredictable combinations. His ability to maintain distance with kicks could be crucial against Spann's reach advantage. In the clinch, OSP's work is particularly effective, often wearing down opponents against the cage.
However, Saint Preux's recent record has been shaky, going 2-3 in his last five fights. His scheduled bout with Spann in September 2024 was canceled due to illness, which may impact his conditioning for this fight.
Ryan Spann: - The model has struggled to accurately predict Spann's fights, incorrectly favoring him in his last two bouts - This trend suggests caution in interpreting the current prediction
Ovince Saint Preux: - The model has shown mixed results with OSP, adding uncertainty to the current prediction
While WolfTicketsAI favors Ryan Spann, this fight presents a classic clash between explosive power and veteran craftiness. Spann's reach advantage and submission threats give him an edge, but OSP's experience and unorthodox style make him a dangerous underdog.
Spann's path to victory likely involves utilizing his reach to land power shots and potentially seeking a submission if the fight goes to the ground. OSP will aim to disrupt Spann's rhythm with his kicks, close the distance, and potentially look for takedowns to neutralize Spann's reach advantage.
The recent cancellation of their September 2024 bout due to OSP's illness adds another layer of uncertainty. Spann's recent submission loss to Krylov may have exposed weaknesses that OSP could exploit, particularly on the ground.
Given the model's mixed track record with both fighters and the various factors at play, this fight could be closer than the odds suggest.
Score: 3 Odds: Carla Esparza: 132 Tecia Pennington: -170
Carla Esparza's MMA success is built on her elite wrestling and grappling skills. Her game plan revolves around using powerful takedowns, clinch work, and pressure against the cage to bring the fight to the mat, where she can utilize her dominant top control and ground-and-pound. Esparza's takedown accuracy of 35% demonstrates her ability to consistently ground opponents.
Once on the mat, Esparza looks to maintain position and unleash strikes from advantageous positions. She's also threats with submissions, particularly the rear-naked choke, which she used to win the inaugural UFC strawweight title.
However, Esparza's striking remains a potential weakness. With a significant strike accuracy of just 40%, she can struggle in prolonged exchanges on the feet. This was evident in her recent title loss to Zhang Weili, who used strong defensive grappling and effective striking to neutralize Esparza's usual approach.
Esparza's split decision win over Rose Namajunas to regain the strawweight title also highlighted the potential limitations of her wrestling-heavy style against opponents with excellent takedown defense and striking abilities. Despite her relentless pursuit of takedowns, Namajunas's movement and striking kept Esparza at bay for much of the fight.
Tecia Pennington brings a more well-rounded skill set to the octagon, combining crisp kickboxing with solid defensive wrestling. Her striking game is built around effective management of range, using diverse kicks to the legs and body to maintain distance and chip away at opponents. Pennington's head movement and footwork make her a difficult target to pin down.
Pennington's striking accuracy of 48% and defense of 61% showcase her proficiency on the feet. She prefers to keep the fight standing where she can make full use of her kickboxing skills and outpoint opponents over the course of the fight.
On the mat, Pennington has demonstrated competent defensive grappling. While not known for offensive wrestling, her 66% takedown defense success rate has allowed her to thwart the attempts of skilled grapplers and work back to her feet. This defensive prowess has been instrumental in victories over fighters like Angela Hill and Juliana Lima.
However, Pennington has had trouble against elite wrestlers who can repeatedly take her down and control her on the ground. Losses to fighters like Mackenzie Dern and Marina Rodriguez have exposed this potential hole in her game.
Clashing Styles: Esparza's wrestling-centric approach collides with Pennington's striking and movement based game. The winner will likely be the fighter who can more effectively enforce their preferred style and strategy.
Takedown Defense: Pennington's ability to stuff Esparza's takedowns and keep the fight on the feet will be pivotal. Her 66% takedown defense will need to hold up against Esparza's relentless pursuit of the ground game.
Clinch Battles: Look for extended clinch battles against the cage as Esparza tries to wear down Pennington and set up takedowns. Pennington's defensive grappling and ability to separate will be crucial.
Striking at Range: When the fight is standing, Pennington will have a clear advantage. Her diverse kicking arsenal and elusiveness could frustrate Esparza, who has a tendency to chase takedowns.
Durability and Pace: Both fighters are known for their cardio and ability to maintain a high pace late into fights. Pennington's average fight time of 13:48 suggests she may have a slight edge if it goes the distance.
WolfTicketsAI favors Tecia Pennington to win, and the betting odds agree, listing Pennington as a -170 favorite. The SHAP data provides insight into this prediction:
Recent Takedowns Attempted per Fight: This was the most significant factor increasing the model's confidence in a Pennington victory. Her recent fights have seen opponents attempting fewer takedowns, likely due to her strong takedown defense and ability to keep the fight standing.
Recent Win Percentage: Despite Pennington's recent win percentage of just 33%, this factor actually increased the prediction score in her favor. This suggests the model looks beyond surface-level stats and considers the overall quality of a fighter's recent performances.
Striking Defense Percentage: Esparza's striking defense percentage was a factor that decreased the prediction score, hinting at a potential vulnerability Pennington could exploit with her precise striking.
Factors like Esparza's betting odds and higher TrueSkill rating did decrease confidence in a Pennington win, but were outweighed by other considerations in the model's final prediction.
WolfTickets has had mixed results predicting these fighters' recent bouts:
But in Esparza's title win over Rose Namajunas, the model incorrectly picked Namajunas to win with a score of 0.76.
In Pennington's most recent outing against Mackenzie Dern, WolfTickets incorrectly predicted a Pennington victory with a score of 0.28.
This track record underscores that while the model provides valuable insight, it's not infallible, especially in fights between closely matched competitors like Esparza and Pennington. The prediction of a Pennington win should be taken into account, but not viewed as a guarantee given the model's history.
The clash between Carla Esparza and Tecia Pennington at UFC 307 shapes up as a classic grappler vs striker matchup. Esparza's relentless wrestling will collide with Pennington's slick striking and movement in a battle to determine whose style reigns supreme.
Esparza's path to victory lies in using her takedowns and smothering top control to stifle Pennington's striking. She'll look to grind away from dominant positions, fishing for submissions or unleashing ground-and-pound. But to get there, she'll have to navigate Pennington's 66% takedown defense and rangy kickboxing.
For Pennington, the key will be stuffing takedowns and making Esparza pay on the feet. Her kickboxing skills, built on a foundation of excellent footwork and diverse kicks, could be the perfect foil to Esparza's wrestling-heavy approach. If she can maintain distance and unload her strikes, she has a real chance to outpoint the former champion.
The metrics and WolfTicketsAI's analysis point to a Pennington edge, but Esparza's championship pedigree and retirement bout status add intriguing wrinkles. Esparza has made a career of grinding out wins against decorated strikers, and she'll undoubtedly bring her A-game for her final trip to the octagon.
Ultimately, Pennington's strong takedown defense and kickboxing prowess tilt the odds in her favor in what promises to be a closely contested battle. But with Esparza's wrestling credentials, this fight could come down to a few pivotal moments. Whichever fighter can enforce their will and implement their game plan will likely have their hand raised.
Score: 12 Odds: Court McGee: 182 Tim Means: -240
Court McGee is a seasoned UFC veteran known for his relentless pressure, high-volume striking, and excellent cardio. His strong wrestling background allows him to secure takedowns and control fights on the ground. McGee's tenacious style and ability to absorb punishment make him a tough out for any opponent.
However, McGee's recent performances have exposed vulnerabilities in his game. He has lost his last three fights, with two of those losses coming by way of knockout. This may impact his confidence heading into the bout against Tim Means. Additionally, McGee's lack of knockout power can lead to longer fights and potential decisions, which may not favor him against a crafty veteran like Means.
Tim "The Dirty Bird" Means is a well-rounded fighter known for his diverse striking arsenal, effective clinch work, and veteran savvy. His reach advantage and proficiency in utilizing elbows and knees make him a formidable opponent in the welterweight division.
Means excels at controlling the pace of fights with his striking and clinch control. His ability to mix up strikes from various angles and employ devastating elbows in close quarters is a key aspect of his game. Means' recent performances showcase his evolution as a fighter, as he has improved his takedown defense and submission game off his back.
However, Means' aggressive style can sometimes be his downfall. He has a tendency to get drawn into brawls, which can leave him vulnerable to counter-strikes. In his recent loss to Kevin Holland, Means struggled to adapt to Holland's dynamic striking and grappling skills.
Stand-up Battle: Both fighters are comfortable on their feet, but Means has the edge in striking diversity. McGee might look to pressure Means and nullify his reach advantage with volume punching.
Clinch Warfare: Both fighters excel in the clinch. Means' elbows could be devastating here, while McGee might use this position to work for takedowns.
Ground Game: If McGee can secure takedowns, he'll look to control Means and potentially work for submissions. However, Means is dangerous off his back and could threaten with submissions of his own.
Cardio Test: McGee's relentless pace could be a factor, especially in later rounds. If he can push Means and wear him down, it could swing the fight in his favor.
WolfTicketsAI's prediction of a Tim Means victory likely stems from several key factors:
Striking Impact Differential: Tim Means holds a significant advantage in striking impact differential (23.97 vs 12.73), suggesting he lands more impactful strikes than McGee.
Recent Performances: Court McGee has lost his last three fights, two by knockout. His recent win percentage is 0%, while Means' is 33%. This suggests Means has had more success in recent outings.
Striking Defense: Means has a slight edge in striking defense percentage (56.10% vs 56.44%), indicating he may be better at avoiding damage.
In past predictions, WolfTicketsAI has had mixed results for both fighters:
For Court McGee, the model correctly predicted 2 out of his last 4 fights, with incorrect predictions in his last two bouts.
For Tim Means, the model has correctly predicted his last 5 fights, although Means has alternated wins and losses during this stretch.
The model's recent accuracy for Means bodes well for its current prediction. However, the incorrect predictions for McGee's last two fights suggest some caution may be warranted, as the model may not have fully accounted for his recent decline.
This fight is likely to be a technical, back-and-forth affair with both fighters having moments of success. McGee's pressure and volume could be the key to victory if he can avoid Means' power shots and elbows in the clinch. Conversely, Means' diverse striking and veteran savvy could allow him to pick apart McGee at range and potentially secure a finish.
While Court McGee's grappling skills and relentless pressure make him a tough out for anyone, Tim Means' striking versatility, clinch work, and recent form give him the edge in this matchup. The model's prediction of a Means victory aligns with the underlying data, which shows Means' advantages in striking impact and recent performance.
However, the ever-resilient Court McGee is more than capable of making this a grueling, back-and-forth battle. His exceptional cardio and ability to absorb punishment could be crucial factors if he can weather Means' early storm and drag him into deep waters.