Results: UFC 304: Edwards vs. Muhammad 2

Fight Info:
Location: Manchester, England
Elevation: 40.00m
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org…
WTAI Model
Main Under Full
60.0% 50.0% 53.85%
Profit Model
Main Under Full
60.0% 62.5% 61.54%
Plain Model
Main Under Full
40.0% 50.0% 46.15%
Selected Bets for Event:
ROI: %
Parlay Successful
Parlay of: Tom Aspinall, Nathaniel Wood, Sam Patterson
  • Odds: -108
Parlay Unsuccessful
Parlay of: Leon Edwards, Arnold Allen, Molly McCann
  • Odds: 154
Parlay Unsuccessful
Parlay of: Tom Aspinall, Molly McCann
  • Odds: -163
Parlay Successful
Parlay of: Arnold Allen, Sam Patterson
  • Odds: -130
Parlay Unsuccessful
Parlay of: Leon Edwards, Nathaniel Wood
  • Odds: -141

The content below shows how the model reached its conclusion for the prediction. The higher the value of the number, the more confident the model is in the prediction. The confidence scores do not perfectly correlate with accuracy. Use your judgement to see where the model may have missed the mark.

The predictions below are shown in dark grey if they were correct, incorrect predictions are shown in red.
Main Card Predictions
Undercard Card Predictions
Fight Analysis
SHAP Chart

Analysis: Leon Edwards vs Belal Muhammad

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Leon Edwards to Win

Score: 11 Odds: Leon Edwards: -235 Belal Muhammad: 180

Leon Edwards's Breakdown

Leon "Rocky" Edwards enters this title defense on a remarkable 12-fight unbeaten streak. His technical striking, particularly his diverse kicking arsenal and sharp elbows from the clinch, has become a hallmark of his fighting style. Edwards's southpaw stance and ability to switch to orthodox, as seen in his bout against Covington, add layers of complexity to his offense.

Edwards's improved takedown defense and wrist control have significantly enhanced his ability to keep fights standing. His composure under pressure and tactical adaptability mid-fight, demonstrated in his victories over Usman and Covington, showcase a champion who's constantly evolving.

Belal Muhammad's Breakdown

Belal "Remember the Name" Muhammad comes into this title shot riding a 9-fight unbeaten streak. Known for his relentless pressure and high-volume striking, Muhammad has steadily climbed the ranks by outlasting and outworking his opponents. His cardio and ability to maintain a high pace throughout five rounds are among his greatest assets.

Muhammad's recent victories, particularly over Gilbert Burns, have demonstrated his improved wrestling and ability to execute strategic game plans against elite competition. His consistent pressure and volume striking, combined with timely takedowns, have become his signature approach.

Previous Fight Breakdown

Their March 2021 encounter ended in a No Contest due to an accidental eye poke by Edwards in the second round. This inconclusive ending sets the stage for an intriguing rematch with championship stakes.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Striking Dynamics: Edwards holds a significant edge in striking technique and power, particularly with his diverse kicking game. Muhammad's high-volume approach could test Edwards's defense but leaves openings for counters.
  • Wrestling and Grappling: While Muhammad's wrestling has improved, Edwards's takedown defense has also shown marked enhancement. The clinch battle will be crucial, with Edwards's elbows and knees potentially making the difference.
  • Cardio and Pace: Both fighters have excellent cardio, but Muhammad's relentless pressure could push Edwards into uncomfortable situations as the fight progresses.
  • Championship Experience: Edwards's experience in five-round title fights gives him an edge in managing the pace and energy expenditure over a potential 25-minute battle.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The significant difference in betting odds heavily influenced the model's prediction in favor of Edwards.
  • Recent Performance: Edwards's recent win percentage and success in title fights have boosted his score.
  • Striking Metrics: Edwards's significant striking impact differential of 6.9412 compared to Muhammad's 13.1111 suggests Edwards lands the more impactful strikes, despite Muhammad's higher volume.
  • Defensive Skills: Edwards's striking defense percentage of 54.77% slightly edges out Muhammad's 57.89%, indicating a tighter defense.
  • Reach Advantage: Edwards's 2-inch reach advantage (74" vs 72") could be crucial in maintaining distance and landing strikes from range.

Past Model Performance

  • The model correctly predicted Edwards's victory over Covington but missed on two of his previous fights against Usman.
  • For Muhammad, the model has been less accurate, incorrectly predicting his losses in two recent fights he won.
  • This inconsistency in predictions adds a layer of uncertainty but doesn't negate the current prediction favoring Edwards.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI's prediction favoring Leon Edwards appears well-founded. Edwards's technical striking superiority, championship experience, and recent performances against elite competition give him a significant edge. While Muhammad's pressure and improved wrestling pose threats, Edwards's ability to control distance, land impactful strikes, and defend takedowns make him the likely victor.

Edwards's adaptability and composure in championship rounds could be the deciding factor. His knack for making crucial adjustments mid-fight, as seen against Usman and Covington, may prove too much for Muhammad's relentless but sometimes predictable approach. Fans should expect a tactical masterclass from Edwards, potentially leading to a decisive victory for the defending champion.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Tom Aspinall vs Curtis Blaydes

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Tom Aspinall to Win

Score: 21 Odds: Tom Aspinall: -390 Curtis Blaydes: 280

Tom Aspinall's Breakdown

Tom Aspinall has rapidly ascended the heavyweight ranks with his unique blend of speed, technical striking, and grappling prowess. His recent performance against Marcin Tybura showcased his evolving skillset, utilizing high kicks, front kicks, and false entries to disrupt his opponent's rhythm. Aspinall's ability to seamlessly transition between striking and grappling makes him a multifaceted threat.

In his fight against Sergei Pavlovich, Aspinall demonstrated his knockout power, finishing the bout in the first round. This victory highlighted his ability to perform under pressure against top-tier competition. However, it's worth noting that Aspinall's career has been marked by some setbacks, including a knee injury in his previous encounter with Blaydes.

Curtis Blaydes' Breakdown

Curtis Blaydes is renowned for his elite wrestling and ground control. His recent victory over Jailton Almeida by KO/TKO demonstrates his improving striking game. Blaydes' strategy often revolves around using his striking to set up takedowns, where he can utilize his devastating ground-and-pound.

However, Blaydes has shown vulnerability against powerful strikers, as evidenced by his loss to Sergei Pavlovich. When unable to implement his wrestling, Blaydes can struggle in striking exchanges, particularly against opponents with knockout power.

Previous Fight Breakdown

Their previous encounter in July 2022 ended abruptly when Aspinall suffered a knee injury just seconds into the fight. This unfortunate ending left many questions unanswered about how their styles would match up over a full bout. The rematch presents an opportunity to settle unfinished business and determine who truly holds the edge in this heavyweight clash.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Speed vs Power: Aspinall's speed and agility contrast with Blaydes' raw power and wrestling prowess.
  • Striking Diversity: Aspinall's varied striking arsenal, including kicks and creative entries, could pose problems for Blaydes.
  • Takedown Battle: Blaydes' wrestling credentials will be tested against Aspinall's improving takedown defense and grappling skills.
  • Injury Recovery: Aspinall's performance post-knee injury will be crucial in determining the outcome.
  • Cardio and Pacing: If the fight goes into later rounds, both fighters' ability to maintain their output will be critical.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The significant edge in betting odds favoring Aspinall heavily influenced the model's prediction.
  • Striking Defense: Aspinall's superior striking defense percentage (66.20% vs 59.68%) suggests he may be more elusive in striking exchanges.
  • Recent Win Percentage: Aspinall's higher recent win percentage indicates better current form.
  • Striking Impact: Aspinall's significant striking impact differential is notably higher, suggesting more effective striking.
  • TrueSkill: Despite Blaydes having a slightly higher TrueSkill rating, other factors outweighed this in the model's prediction.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has had mixed results predicting both fighters' bouts:

  • Correctly predicted Aspinall's win against Marcin Tybura.
  • Incorrectly predicted Aspinall to win in their previous encounter, which ended due to injury.
  • Incorrectly predicted Blaydes to win against Sergei Pavlovich.
  • Correctly predicted Blaydes' recent win over Jailton Almeida.

The model's inconsistent performance for both fighters suggests caution in interpreting this prediction.

Conclusion

Aspinall's recent form, coupled with his diverse skill set and finishing ability, gives him the edge according to WolfTicketsAI.

The key to victory for Aspinall likely lies in his ability to keep the fight standing, utilize his superior striking, and defend against takedowns. Blaydes, on the other hand, will aim to implement his grinding wrestling game while mixing in improved striking to keep Aspinall guessing.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Bobby Green vs Paddy Pimblett

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Bobby Green to Win

Score: 8 Odds: Bobby Green: -122 Paddy Pimblett: -104

Bobby Green's Breakdown

Bobby Green, a seasoned veteran with a 32-15-1 record, brings a wealth of experience to this lightweight bout. Known for his unorthodox striking style and defensive prowess, Green has shown remarkable adaptability throughout his career. His recent performances have been a mixed bag, with a notable KO loss to Jalin Turner followed by a bounce-back victory against Jim Miller.

Green's fighting style is characterized by: - Excellent head movement and shoulder rolls, making him a difficult target - High-volume striking with crisp, straight punches - Effective counter-striking abilities - Improved offensive output in recent fights

Green's defensive skills have been his cornerstone, but he's evolved to become more aggressive, increasing his striking volume while maintaining his elusiveness. This shift has made him a more dangerous opponent, as evidenced by his recent KO victory over Grant Dawson.

Paddy Pimblett's Breakdown

Paddy "The Baddy" Pimblett, with a 21-3 record, has quickly become a fan favorite in the UFC. The charismatic Liverpudlian has shown flashes of brilliance coupled with concerning vulnerabilities. Pimblett's game is centered around: - Aggressive grappling and submission skills - Dynamic striking, albeit with defensive lapses - Resilience and ability to recover from early adversity

Pimblett's UFC tenure has been marked by exciting finishes and controversial decisions. His recent unanimous decision win over Tony Ferguson showcased improvements, but questions remain about his ability to handle top-tier competition.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Striking Dynamics: Green's refined boxing and defensive skills contrast sharply with Pimblett's more wild, aggressive style. Green's ability to slip punches and counter effectively could exploit Pimblett's tendency to leave himself open.
  • Grappling Edge: Pimblett holds a significant advantage in submissions, with 1.63 submissions per fight compared to Green's 0.27. However, Green's takedown defense (39% historically, improved to 43% recently) could neutralize Pimblett's grappling attempts.
  • Experience Factor: Green's extensive UFC experience against high-level competition gives him a strategic edge. He's faced a wider variety of elite fighters and shown the ability to adapt mid-fight.
  • Cardio and Pace: Both fighters have shown the ability to maintain a high pace. Green's recent increase in striking volume (7.91 strikes landed per minute) matches well with Pimblett's output (7.17 strikes landed per minute).
  • Defensive Concerns: While Green has historically absorbed fewer strikes, Pimblett's defensive lapses are more pronounced and could be a critical factor.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The close odds (-122 for Green vs -104 for Pimblett) suggest a competitive matchup, but WolfTicketsAI's confidence in Green is notable.
  • Significant Striking Impact Differential: Green's superior 30.84 vs Pimblett's 13.2 indicates Green's ability to land impactful strikes while avoiding damage.
  • Striking Defense Percentage: Green's 61.95% vs Pimblett's 41.38% highlights Green's defensive edge.
  • TrueSkill: Green's lower sigma (2.18 vs Pimblett's 4.73) suggests more consistent performances, making him a more reliable pick.

Past Model Performance

  • Green: WolfTicketsAI has shown mixed results predicting Green's fights, correctly calling his win against Jim Miller but missing on the Grant Dawson upset.
  • Pimblett: The model has been consistently accurate in predicting Pimblett's victories, including his controversial win over Jared Gordon.

Conclusion

While Pimblett's grappling prowess and finishing ability make him a dangerous opponent, Green's experience, striking acumen, and defensive skills give him the edge. The prediction aligns with Green's recent improvements in offensive output while maintaining his defensive strengths. However, Pimblett's unpredictability and submission threat cannot be overlooked. Expect a competitive fight with Green's technical striking and defense being the deciding factors.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Muhammad Mokaev vs Manel Kape

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Muhammad Mokaev to Win

Score: 6 Odds: Muhammad Mokaev: -146 Manel Kape: 114

Muhammad Mokaev's Breakdown

Muhammad Mokaev enters this flyweight bout as the favorite, boasting an impressive undefeated record of 12-0 with 1 no contest. His UFC career has been nothing short of spectacular, with five consecutive victories since his debut in March 2022. Mokaev's wrestling-heavy approach has been the cornerstone of his success, averaging an astounding 5.75 takedowns per fight with a 41.79% accuracy rate.

Mokaev's grappling prowess was on full display in his recent victories over Tim Elliott and Alex Perez, where he showcased his ability to control opponents on the ground and find submissions. Against Elliott, Mokaev's relentless takedown attempts eventually paid off with a third-round arm-triangle choke. This fight highlighted Mokaev's persistence and ability to wear down opponents over time.

However, Mokaev's striking game shouldn't be overlooked. In his UFC debut against Cody Durden, he demonstrated explosive power with a jumping knee that set up a quick guillotine choke victory. This versatility makes Mokaev a threat in all areas of the fight.

Manel Kape's Breakdown

Manel Kape enters this matchup with a 19-6 record and is riding a four-fight win streak in the UFC. Known for his striking prowess, Kape has shown significant improvement since his initial UFC outings. His recent performances against Felipe dos Santos and David Dvorak have demonstrated his ability to outwork opponents over three rounds, showcasing improved cardio and fight IQ.

Kape's striking statistics are impressive, landing 5.12 significant strikes per minute with a 54.74% accuracy. His knockout power is evident, with 1.09 knockdowns per fight, making him a constant threat on the feet. Kape's head movement and counter-striking abilities have also improved, as shown by his 59.53% significant strike defense.

However, Kape's takedown defense could be a critical factor in this matchup. With a takedown defense ratio of only 28.57%, he may struggle against Mokaev's relentless wrestling attack.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Wrestling vs. Striking: This bout presents a classic grappler vs. striker matchup, with Mokaev's wrestling pitted against Kape's striking.
  • Takedown Defense: Kape's ability to defend takedowns will be crucial. If he can keep the fight standing, his striking advantage could be the deciding factor.
  • Cardio and Pace: Mokaev's relentless pace and takedown attempts could wear down Kape over three rounds.
  • Striking Exchanges: In brief striking exchanges, Kape's power and accuracy could pose problems for Mokaev.
  • Ground Control: If Mokaev secures takedowns, his top control and submission threats will be significant challenges for Kape.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Recent Takedowns Attempted per Fight: Mokaev's 14.53 recent takedown attempts per fight significantly outweigh Kape's 1.99, giving Mokaev a clear path to victory through wrestling.
  • Odds: The betting odds favor Mokaev, suggesting public confidence in his abilities and recent performances.
  • Recent Win Percentage: Both fighters have a 100% recent win rate, but Mokaev's undefeated record gives him a slight edge in momentum.
  • TrueSkill: Kape's lower TrueSkill rating (29.31 vs. Mokaev's 35.43) indicates that the model views Mokaev as the more skilled fighter overall.
  • Striking Defense Percentage: Kape's superior striking defense (57.02% vs. Mokaev's 35.76%) could be crucial if he can keep the fight standing.
  • Recent Significant Striking Impact Differential: Mokaev's positive differential suggests he's been more effective in recent striking exchanges, potentially narrowing Kape's perceived striking advantage.

Past Model Performance

For Muhammad Mokaev, WolfTickets has correctly predicted his last three fights: - vs. Alex Perez (Decision) - vs. Tim Elliott (Submission) - vs. Malcolm Gordon (Submission)

This consistent accuracy lends credibility to the current prediction favoring Mokaev.

For Manel Kape, there's only one recorded prediction: - vs. David Dvorak (Decision), which was correctly predicted

While the model has been accurate for both fighters, the limited data for Kape introduces some uncertainty. However, the model's perfect record in predicting Mokaev's fights provides a strong basis for confidence in the current prediction.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI's prediction favoring Muhammad Mokaev is well-supported by his dominant wrestling, undefeated record, and the model's past accuracy in predicting his fights. While Manel Kape's striking prowess presents a significant threat, Mokaev's relentless takedown attempts and ground control are likely to be the deciding factors. Kape's questionable takedown defense could be his undoing against such a prolific wrestler. Expect Mokaev to implement a grappling-heavy gameplan, potentially securing a decision victory or late submission if Kape fatigues from defending takedowns.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Arnold Allen vs Giga Chikadze

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Arnold Allen to Win

Score: 10 Odds: Arnold Allen: -260 Giga Chikadze: 196

Arnold Allen's Breakdown

Arnold Allen enters this bout as the favorite, bringing a well-rounded skill set and a history of consistent performances in the UFC. Known for his powerful striking, particularly his fast hands and left straight, Allen has shown the ability to finish fights both on the feet and on the ground. His aggressive style and high-level cardio allow him to maintain pressure throughout fights.

Allen's recent performances have highlighted both his strengths and areas for improvement. Against Max Holloway, he struggled to adapt to a more elusive opponent, exposing some limitations in his offensive arsenal. However, his knockout victories over Calvin Kattar and Dan Hooker demonstrate his finishing ability against top-tier competition.

A key aspect of Allen's game is his improving defensive skills, incorporating elements like a high lead elbow and shoulder roll. This evolution in his striking defense could prove crucial against a skilled kickboxer like Chikadze.

Giga Chikadze's Breakdown

Giga Chikadze brings world-class kickboxing credentials to this matchup. His striking arsenal is diverse and dangerous, with his signature "Giga Kick" (a left body kick from southpaw stance) being a particularly potent weapon. Chikadze's ability to control distance and timing has been a key factor in his UFC success.

However, Chikadze's last loss to Calvin Kattar exposed vulnerabilities in his game when faced with relentless pressure and wrestling. Kattar's ability to close distance and mix in takedown attempts disrupted Chikadze's preferred striking range, leading to a lopsided decision loss.

Chikadze rebounded with a unanimous decision win over Alex Caceres, showcasing improvements in his defensive grappling and ability to maintain his striking effectiveness over three rounds. This fight will test whether those improvements are enough to counter Allen's aggressive style.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Striking Exchanges: Both fighters are primarily strikers, but with different approaches. Allen's power punching vs Chikadze's diverse kicking game will be a crucial factor.
  • Distance Management: Chikadze's success heavily relies on controlling distance. Allen's ability to close that distance without eating too much damage will be key.
  • Pressure and Pace: Allen's forward pressure and high output could replicate the issues Chikadze faced against Kattar.
  • Grappling Threat: While not his primary game, Allen's takedown attempts could disrupt Chikadze's rhythm and provide a path to victory.
  • Cardio and Late Rounds: Both fighters have shown the ability to go five rounds, but Allen's pressure style might give him an edge in a prolonged battle.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The betting odds heavily favor Allen, which significantly influenced the model's prediction.
  • Striking Defense: Allen's improved striking defense could be crucial in neutralizing Chikadze's kicks.
  • Significant Striking Impact: Allen's edge in striking impact suggests he may land the more damaging blows.
  • Recent Performance: Allen's recent fights against top competition, despite losses, may have boosted the model's confidence in his abilities.
  • Takedown Attempts: Allen's higher rate of takedown attempts could be a key differentiator, potentially disrupting Chikadze's striking rhythm.

Past Model Performance

For Arnold Allen, WolfTicketsAI has a mixed record: - Correctly predicted his loss to Movsar Evloev - Incorrectly predicted his win against Max Holloway - Incorrectly predicted his loss to Calvin Kattar - Correctly predicted his win against Dan Hooker

For Giga Chikadze, WolfTicketsAI has been more consistent: - Correctly predicted his win against Alex Caceres - Incorrectly predicted his win against Calvin Kattar

The model's performance suggests a decent track record, but caution is warranted given the inconsistencies, particularly with Allen's recent fights.

Conclusion

This featherweight clash presents an intriguing stylistic matchup between Allen's pressure-heavy, boxing-centric approach and Chikadze's rangy kickboxing game. While the model favors Allen, likely due to his recent high-level competition and improved defensive skills, Chikadze's striking prowess cannot be overlooked. Allen's path to victory lies in pressuring Chikadze, mixing in takedown threats, and landing his power shots in close quarters. Chikadze, conversely, must maintain distance, utilize his diverse kicking arsenal, and avoid being backed against the fence. Given the model's mixed performance on recent predictions, this fight could be closer than the odds suggest, making it a compelling and potentially unpredictable contest.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Nathaniel Wood vs Daniel Pineda

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Nathaniel Wood to Win

Score: 28 Odds: Nathaniel Wood: -500 Daniel Pineda: +340

Nathaniel Wood's Breakdown

Nathaniel Wood, known as "The Prospect," has been making waves in the UFC's featherweight division. His recent performances showcase a fighter who's evolving rapidly, blending technical striking with clever clinch work and grappling. Wood's ability to adapt mid-fight was on full display in his bout against Andre Fili, where he adjusted his strategy from low kicks to a more boxing-centric approach when countered.

Wood's striking arsenal is diverse, featuring a galloping jab, right front kicks to the body, and effective low kicks. His high-volume striking approach, coupled with precise footwork, allows him to control the pace of fights. In the clinch, Wood excels at using elbows and trips, reminiscent of fighters like Matt Brown and Petr Yan.

However, Wood's recent loss to Muhammad Naimov by unanimous decision suggests there might be some vulnerabilities in his game against certain styles. This setback came after a string of impressive performances, including wins over Andre Fili and Charles Jourdain.

Daniel Pineda's Breakdown

Daniel Pineda, a veteran of the sport, brings a wealth of experience to the octagon. Known for his aggressive style and finishing ability, Pineda has shown he can end fights both on the feet and on the ground. His UFC record is a mixed bag of impressive finishes and tough losses, reflecting his high-risk, high-reward approach.

Pineda's most recent outing resulted in a unanimous decision loss to Alex Caceres, but prior to that, he secured a submission victory over Tucker Lutz. This win highlighted Pineda's dangerous ground game and his ability to capitalize on opportunities when the fight hits the mat.

One of Pineda's strengths is his submission prowess, boasting a high number of submission attempts per fight. However, his striking defense has shown some vulnerabilities, which could be a critical factor against a technical striker like Wood.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Striking Differential: Wood's significant striking impact differential is notably higher than Pineda's, suggesting he may have the edge in striking exchanges.
  • Defensive Skills: Wood's striking defense percentage is significantly better than Pineda's, which could be crucial in a stand-up battle.
  • Grappling Threat: While Wood has shown improved grappling, Pineda's submission threat cannot be overlooked, potentially forcing Wood to be cautious in grappling exchanges.
  • Recent Form: Wood's recent performances, despite the loss to Naimov, have been more consistent compared to Pineda's mixed results.
  • Adaptability: Wood's ability to adjust his gameplan mid-fight could be a significant factor, especially if Pineda tries to force grappling exchanges.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The significant difference in betting odds heavily favors Wood, which is the strongest factor in the model's prediction.
  • Striking Impact: Wood's superior significant striking impact differential suggests he may be able to outland Pineda in striking exchanges.
  • Defensive Skills: Wood's better striking defense percentage indicates he may be harder to hit cleanly, potentially frustrating Pineda's offensive efforts.
  • Recent Performance: While both fighters have had mixed results lately, Wood's overall recent performances have been more impressive, likely contributing to the model's confidence.

Past Model Performance

For Nathaniel Wood: - The model correctly predicted Wood's win against Andre Fili but incorrectly predicted his loss to Muhammad Naimov. - It also missed on the Charles Jourdain fight, predicting Jourdain to win when Wood emerged victorious.

For Daniel Pineda: - The model correctly predicted Pineda's loss to Alex Caceres and his win over Tucker Lutz.

The model's mixed performance on Wood's fights suggests some caution in interpreting its current prediction. However, the consistent predictions for Pineda's recent fights lend some credibility to the current forecast.

Conclusion

The data strongly supports WolfTicketsAI's prediction of a Nathaniel Wood victory. Wood's superior striking metrics, better recent form, and stronger defensive skills give him multiple paths to victory. His ability to maintain a high pace and improved takedown defense should allow him to control where the fight takes place.

Expect Wood to utilize his technical striking and footwork to keep Pineda at bay, avoiding wild exchanges that could favor the more aggressive fighter. Wood will likely aim to weather Pineda's early storm and then capitalize on his cardio advantage in the later rounds. While Pineda's submission threat and early aggression can't be ignored, Wood's well-rounded game and strategic approach should lead him to a decision win or potentially a late stoppage.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Molly McCann vs Bruna Brasil

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Molly McCann to Win

Score: 26 Odds: Molly McCann: -350 Bruna Brasil: 255

Molly McCann's Breakdown

Molly "Meatball" McCann enters this strawweight bout with a reputation for aggressive striking and relentless pressure. Her recent move down from flyweight suggests a strategic decision to leverage her power in a lighter division. McCann's UFC career has been a rollercoaster, marked by impressive victories and challenging losses.

In her last outing, McCann showcased significant improvement in her ground game, securing a submission victory over Diana Belbita. This win demonstrated her evolving skill set, particularly in grappling, which has historically been her weakness. McCann's boxing remains her primary weapon, with sharp combinations and a penchant for landing impactful strikes, including her signature spinning back elbow.

McCann's tenacity and cardio allow her to maintain a high pace, often overwhelming opponents with volume striking. However, her aggressive style can leave her vulnerable to counterstrikes and takedowns, aspects she's been working to address.

Bruna Brasil's Breakdown

Bruna Brasil, a relative newcomer to the UFC, brings a diverse skill set to this matchup. With a background in striking and grappling, Brasil has shown promise but also inconsistency in her brief UFC tenure. Her most recent fight, a unanimous decision loss to Loma Lookboonmee, highlighted both her potential and areas for improvement.

Brasil's striking defense has been a concern, absorbing more significant strikes than she lands. However, she's demonstrated decent takedown accuracy and defense, which could play a crucial role against McCann's primarily striking-based offense.

Brasil's ability to mix up her attacks, transitioning between striking and grappling, could pose challenges for McCann. However, her limited UFC experience may be a disadvantage against the more seasoned McCann.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Weight Class Shift: McCann's move to strawweight could significantly impact her performance, potentially enhancing her power and speed.
  • Striking Battle: Expect a high-volume striking affair, with McCann likely pushing the pace and Brasil looking to counter.
  • Grappling Wild Card: McCann's improved submission game adds an interesting dimension, but Brasil's grappling credentials could nullify this advantage.
  • Experience Gap: McCann's extensive UFC experience gives her a significant edge in high-pressure situations.
  • Defensive Concerns: Both fighters have shown defensive vulnerabilities, which could lead to a back-and-forth, action-packed fight.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The significant betting odds in McCann's favor heavily influenced the model's prediction, suggesting strong public and expert confidence in her victory.
  • Striking Impact: McCann's superior significant striking impact differential indicates her ability to land more damaging blows, a crucial factor in the prediction.
  • Recent Performance: McCann's higher recent win percentage and improved grappling showcase in her last fight likely boosted the model's confidence in her adaptability and current form.
  • Defensive Skills: McCann's better striking defense percentage suggests she may be harder to hit cleanly, potentially frustrating Brasil's offense.
  • Takedown Attempts: McCann's higher rate of recent takedown attempts indicates a more diverse attack, which could keep Brasil guessing and off-balance.

Past Model Performance

WolfTicketsAI has shown mixed results in predicting Molly McCann's fights: - Correctly predicted her win against Diana Belbita (Submission) - Incorrectly predicted her win against Julija Stoliarenko (Lost by Submission) - Correctly predicted her loss to Erin Blanchfield - Accurately predicted her victories against Hannah Goldy and Luana Carolina

The model has limited data on Bruna Brasil, with only one prediction: - Correctly predicted her loss to Loma Lookboonmee

While the model has been more accurate than not with McCann, the incorrect prediction against Stoliarenko highlights the importance of considering grappling threats. The limited data on Brasil adds uncertainty to the prediction.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI's prediction favoring Molly McCann aligns with her recent performance and statistical advantages. McCann's successful transition to strawweight, coupled with her improved grappling, presents a formidable challenge for Brasil. However, Brasil's diverse skill set and potential size advantage at strawweight could pose problems for the Liverpool native. The fight's outcome likely hinges on whether McCann can implement her high-pressure striking game or if Brasil can leverage her kickboxing and BJJ background to control the fight's pace and location. While McCann enters as the rightful favorite, Brasil's well-rounded abilities make her a dangerous underdog in this compelling strawweight clash.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Caolan Loughran vs Jake Hadley

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Caolan Loughran to Win

Score: 18 Odds: Caolan Loughran: -215 Jake Hadley: 164

Caolan Loughran's Breakdown

Caolan Loughran enters this bout with an impressive 9-1 record, including a recent unanimous decision victory over Angel Pacheco at UFC on ESPN 54. His UFC tenure is brief with just two fights, but he's shown promise with a 1-1 record in the promotion. Loughran's striking game is noteworthy, landing 6.27 significant strikes per minute with a 47% accuracy. His takedown game is aggressive, attempting 7.5 takedowns per fight, though his accuracy sits at 33.3%.

What stands out about Loughran is his finishing ability, boasting a 77.8% win finish rate. This suggests he's not just content to outpoint opponents but actively seeks stoppages. His ability to mix up attacks is evident in his stats, showing proficiency in head strikes (4.67 landed per minute) and a solid leg kick game (0.57 landed per minute). Loughran's striking defense percentage of 56.68% suggests he's adept at avoiding damage, which could be crucial against a fighter like Hadley who has shown knockout power.

Jake Hadley's Breakdown

Jake Hadley comes into this fight with a 10-3 record, boasting more UFC experience with five fights in the promotion. However, he's on a two-fight skid, dropping unanimous decisions to Cody Durden and Charles Johnson. Hadley's UFC career has been a rollercoaster, with wins over Malcolm Gordon (KO/TKO) and Carlos Candelario (Submission) sandwiched between losses.

The most significant factor for Hadley in this bout is his move up from flyweight to bantamweight. This weight class shift could have profound implications on his performance. Historically, Hadley has struggled with making the 125-pound limit, so this move might alleviate some of the stress associated with extreme weight cutting.

Statistically, Hadley lands fewer significant strikes per minute (3.39) compared to Loughran, but with a similar accuracy of 42.33%. His grappling stats are intriguing - while he hasn't secured a takedown in the UFC, he attempts 3.91 per fight, suggesting a willingness to mix it up on the ground. Hadley's submission rate of 1.39 per fight indicates a dangerous ground game when he does get the fight to the mat.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Weight Class Shift: Hadley's move from flyweight to bantamweight is a game-changer. While it may improve his cardio and durability, it puts him at a significant size disadvantage against Loughran.
  • Size Mismatch: Loughran is considered a decent-sized to big bantamweight, while Hadley was one of the smallest fighters at flyweight. This disparity could be crucial in grappling exchanges and striking at range.
  • Striking Differential: Loughran's significant striking output differential of 1.5 contrasts sharply with Hadley's -7.6, suggesting Loughran may have the edge in the striking exchanges.
  • Recent Form: Loughran is coming off a win, while Hadley has lost his last two fights, potentially impacting confidence and momentum.
  • Experience Factor: Hadley's greater UFC experience could play a role, but Loughran's undefeated record outside the UFC and high finish rate shouldn't be discounted.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The betting odds heavily favor Loughran, which significantly influenced the model's prediction.
  • Recent Takedown Attempts: Loughran's higher rate of recent takedown attempts (5.67 per fight) compared to Hadley's 1.56 suggests a more aggressive wrestling game, which the model views favorably.
  • Striking Impact: Loughran's superior striking impact differential (8.0 vs Hadley's -3.4) indicates he's likely to land the more damaging strikes.
  • Recent Win Percentage: Despite Loughran's overall better record, his recent win percentage of 33% is identical to Hadley's, suggesting both fighters have faced recent challenges.
  • TrueSkill: The model gives a slight edge to Loughran in overall skill level, though the difference is minimal.

Past Model Performance

For Caolan Loughran, there is no past prediction data available. This lack of historical performance adds uncertainty to the current prediction.

For Jake Hadley, the model has a mixed track record, correctly predicting his wins against Malcolm Gordon and Carlos Candelario, but incorrectly predicting his last two losses. This inconsistency, coupled with Hadley's weight class change, adds an element of unpredictability to the current prediction.

Conclusion

The model favors Caolan Loughran in this bantamweight clash, largely due to his superior striking metrics, aggressive takedown game, and significant size advantage. Loughran's high finishing rate and recent success at bantamweight make him a formidable opponent. However, Jake Hadley's move up in weight adds an element of unpredictability. While the weight class shift may improve Hadley's cardio and durability, it puts him at a considerable size disadvantage.

The key to this fight likely lies in how well Hadley can adapt to the new weight class and whether he can use his potentially superior speed and technique to overcome Loughran's physical advantages. Loughran, on the other hand, will look to capitalize on his size, using his reach to control distance in striking exchanges and his strength in clinch situations and takedowns.

Given the model's mixed performance on Hadley's recent fights, the lack of data for Loughran, and the significant factor of Hadley's weight class change, this prediction should be approached with caution. This bout has the potential to be a technical, back-and-forth affair that could go either way, with Loughran's physical advantages pitted against Hadley's experience and potential speed advantage.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Mick Parkin vs Lukasz Brzeski

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Mick Parkin to Win

Score: 19 Odds: Mick Parkin: -265 Lukasz Brzeski: 200

Mick Parkin's Breakdown

Mick Parkin, the 28-year-old English heavyweight prospect, enters this bout with an unblemished 9-0 professional record. His UFC career has been particularly impressive, with three consecutive victories showcasing his versatility and fight IQ. Parkin's finishing rate is noteworthy, with 56% of his wins coming by KO/TKO and 11% by submission, demonstrating his well-rounded skill set.

Standing at 6'4" with a 79-inch reach, Parkin possesses the physical attributes to control distance effectively. In his UFC outings, he's displayed a knack for mixing striking with grappling, often using his wrestling to dictate the pace of the fight. His most recent victory against Mohammed Usman in March 2024 highlighted his ability to go the distance and outwork opponents, a valuable asset in the heavyweight division.

Parkin's striking, while not flashy, has been efficient. He's shown a knack for mixing up his attacks, using leg kicks to set up his punches and keeping opponents guessing. His clinch work has been particularly noteworthy, using his size and strength to wear down opponents against the cage.

Lukasz Brzeski's Breakdown

Lukasz "The Bull" Brzeski, the 32-year-old Polish heavyweight, brings a 9-4-1 (1 NC) record into this fight. Despite his more extensive experience, Brzeski has struggled in the UFC, losing his first three octagon appearances before securing a victory against Valter Walker in April 2024.

Like Parkin, Brzeski has shown diversity in his fighting style, with 56% of his wins coming by KO/TKO and 22% each by submission and decision. Standing at 6'4" with a 78.3-inch reach, he matches Parkin in height but gives up a slight reach advantage.

Brzeski's striking can be effective when he gets going, particularly his body work, but he's struggled to maintain a consistent output against high-level opposition. His takedown defense has been a glaring weakness in previous UFC outings, which could be a significant factor against a grappler like Parkin.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Grappling Advantage: Parkin's wrestling and control could be the deciding factor. He averages 1 takedown per fight with a 30% accuracy, while Brzeski has yet to score a takedown in the UFC.
  • Striking Efficiency: While Brzeski has shown higher striking output in some fights, Parkin's striking defense is notably better (57.91% vs 49.75%).
  • Recent Form: Parkin is riding a three-fight win streak in the UFC, while Brzeski recently broke a three-fight losing streak.
  • Physical Attributes: Both fighters are 6'4", but Parkin's slight reach advantage (79" vs 78.3") could play a role in striking exchanges.
  • Experience vs. Momentum: Brzeski has more professional fights, but Parkin's undefeated record and recent UFC success give him significant momentum.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The betting odds heavily favor Parkin (-265 vs +200), significantly influencing the model's prediction.
  • Recent Win Percentage: Parkin's 100% UFC win rate compared to Brzeski's 25% (1-3) is a major factor.
  • Recent Takedowns Attempted: Parkin's aggressive wrestling approach (4.89 attempts per fight) contrasts sharply with Brzeski's 0.29, indicating a likely grappling advantage.
  • Striking Defense Percentage: Parkin's superior striking defense suggests he may be able to avoid damage more effectively.
  • Significant Striking Impact Differential: Parkin's positive differential indicates he's been more effective in landing impactful strikes while avoiding damage.

Past Model Performance

For Mick Parkin, WolfTicketsAI correctly predicted his victory against Mohammed Usman on 2024-03-23, albeit with a relatively close score of 0.53. This successful prediction adds some confidence to the current forecast.

For Lukasz Brzeski, the model correctly predicted his loss against Waldo Cortes-Acosta on 2023-08-26 with a more decisive score of 0.63. This accurate prediction for Brzeski's defeat further supports the model's current assessment.

The model's past performance on both fighters aligns with its current prediction, increasing confidence in the forecast. However, the relatively low sample size for both fighters suggests some caution is still warranted.

Conclusion

Mick Parkin enters this heavyweight bout as the clear favorite, and for good reason. His undefeated record, coupled with a well-rounded skill set and strong grappling, makes him a formidable opponent. Lukasz Brzeski, while experienced, faces an uphill battle. Expect Parkin to utilize his wrestling to control the fight, potentially mixing in ground-and-pound or submissions if the opportunity arises. While Brzeski's striking could pose a threat if he can keep the fight standing, Parkin's superior defense and fight IQ should allow him to navigate any dangerous waters. The bout's location in Manchester, England, could provide an additional boost for the English fighter. Barring a significant upset, Parkin is likely to extend his winning streak and cement his status as a rising heavyweight contender.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Oban Elliott vs Preston Parsons

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Oban Elliott to Win

Score: 15 Odds: Oban Elliott: 118 Preston Parsons: -150

Oban Elliott's Breakdown

Oban Elliott, the 26-year-old Welsh fighter, enters this welterweight bout with an impressive 10-2 record and a recent unanimous decision victory over Val Woodburn at UFC 298. Despite having only one UFC fight under his belt, Elliott showcased a well-rounded skill set in that performance. His striking output was particularly noteworthy, landing 9.07 strikes per minute with a 72.34% accuracy rate.

Elliott's grappling-heavy style focuses on position-based control, as evidenced by his successful execution of 3 out of 5 attempted takedowns in his debut. His ability to overcome early adversity, using his grappling to control the fight and threaten submissions, could be a significant factor against Parsons. Elliott's striking defense, while not impenetrable, proved effective with a 62.3% significant striking defense percentage.

Preston Parsons's Breakdown

Preston Parsons, the 28-year-old from Florida, brings a wealth of experience to the octagon with an 11-4 record and four UFC fights to his name. His most recent outing resulted in a unanimous decision win over Matthew Semelsberger, showcasing his ability to compete at the highest level. Parsons's game is well-rounded, with a brown belt in both Taekwondo and Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.

Parsons's striking, while not as voluminous as Elliott's, is still respectable at 6.62 strikes landed per minute. His significant striking accuracy sits at 55.49%. Defensively, Parsons has shown some vulnerabilities, absorbing 2.4 head strikes per minute and maintaining a 51.56% significant striking defense percentage. Notably, 9 of Parsons' 11 wins have come by submission, including armbars and rear-naked chokes, highlighting his strong ground game.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Grappling Battle: Both fighters excel in grappling, with Elliott's position control facing off against Parsons' submission threats.
  • Striking Differential: Elliott's striking impact and output differentials significantly outpace Parsons, suggesting a potential advantage in stand-up exchanges.
  • Experience Gap: While Parsons has more UFC fights, Elliott's dominant performance in his debut suggests he may be able to close this gap quickly.
  • Momentum: Elliott's undefeated UFC record might provide a psychological edge.
  • Home Advantage: The fight takes place in Manchester, England, potentially giving Elliott a slight edge as the UK-based fighter.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Significant Striking Impact Differential: This feature significantly boosted the model's confidence in Elliott. His 47.0 differential compared to Parsons's 8.0 suggests a substantial edge in effective striking.
  • Striking Impact Differential: Another strong indicator favoring Elliott, with his 106.0 differential dwarfing Parsons's 34.75.
  • Recent Win Percentage: Elliott's 83% recent win rate, compared to Parsons's 67%, likely contributed to the model's prediction.
  • TrueSkill: Despite fewer UFC appearances, Elliott's slightly higher TrueSkill rating (Mu: 25.0 vs 23.41) suggests rapid improvement and potential.

Past Model Performance

The model has limited data on Elliott, with no previous UFC predictions. This lack of historical performance data introduces some uncertainty to the prediction.

For Parsons, the model has a mixed record: - Correctly predicted Parsons's loss to Trevin Giles. - Incorrectly predicted Parsons would lose to Matthew Semelsberger in his most recent fight.

This mixed performance suggests caution in interpreting the current prediction, especially given Elliott's limited UFC exposure.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI's prediction favoring Oban Elliott is rooted in his superior striking metrics and recent performance. The key to victory for Elliott will likely be his ability to maintain his striking advantage while defending against Parsons's submission attempts. Parsons's experience and diverse skill set make him a dangerous opponent, particularly on the ground. The fight's location in Manchester could provide a slight edge to Elliott, potentially bolstering his confidence. While the model shows confidence in Elliott, the limited UFC data on him and the model's mixed results with Parsons suggest approaching this prediction with measured optimism.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Christian Leroy Duncan vs Gregory Rodrigues

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Christian Leroy Duncan to Win

Score: 6 Odds: Christian Leroy Duncan: -136 Gregory Rodrigues: 106

Christian Leroy Duncan's Breakdown

Duncan, a 29-year-old rising star in the middleweight division, boasts an impressive 10-1 professional record with a remarkable 80% knockout-to-win ratio. His striking prowess is evident in his recent performances, securing back-to-back KO/TKO victories against Claudio Ribeiro and Denis Tiuliulin. Duncan's offensive output is impressive, landing 5.96 significant strikes per minute with a 62.86% accuracy.

Defensively, Duncan shines, absorbing only 3.82 significant strikes per minute and successfully defending all takedown attempts in the UFC so far. His leg kick game is particularly noteworthy, landing 1.89 per minute while absorbing just 1.38, which could be crucial in controlling the distance against Rodrigues.

Gregory Rodrigues's Breakdown

At 31, "Robocop" Rodrigues brings a wealth of experience with his 15-5 record and well-rounded skill set. Known for his aggressive brawling style, Rodrigues lands 6.08 significant strikes per minute. However, his tendency to engage in firefights leaves him vulnerable, absorbing 5.30 significant strikes per minute.

Rodrigues's grappling credentials as a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu black belt add another dimension to his arsenal. He averages 2.54 takedowns per fight with a 47.83% accuracy, which could be a key factor against the primarily striking-oriented Duncan. His recent form is impressive, coming off two consecutive KO/TKO wins over Brad Tavares and Denis Tiuliulin.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Striking Differential: Duncan's superior striking differential and defense could be decisive.
  • Knockout Power: Both fighters have demonstrated significant KO/TKO power, setting the stage for a potential firefight.
  • Grappling X-Factor: Rodrigues's BJJ background and takedown ability pose a threat to Duncan.
  • Reach Advantage: Duncan's 79-inch reach gives him a 4-inch advantage, crucial for distance control.
  • Recent Form: Both fighters enter with momentum from recent impressive victories.
  • Short Notice Factor: Rodrigues took this fight on short notice, replacing Robert Bryczek, which could impact his preparation.
  • Home Advantage: The Manchester location gives Duncan a potential boost from the home crowd.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The betting odds significantly favor Duncan, heavily influencing the model's prediction.
  • Recent Win Percentage: Duncan's higher recent win percentage boosts the model's confidence.
  • Significant Striking Impact Differential: Duncan's superior striking impact in recent fights is a key factor.
  • TrueSkill: Despite Rodrigues's slightly higher TrueSkill rating, other factors tilt the prediction towards Duncan.
  • Reach: Duncan's reach advantage factors into the prediction, potentially giving him an edge in striking exchanges.
  • Striking Defense Percentage: Rodrigues's slightly better striking defense percentage could make the fight more competitive than predicted.

Past Model Performance

For Christian Leroy Duncan: - Correctly predicted win against Claudio Ribeiro. - Incorrectly predicted win against Armen Petrosyan (unanimous decision loss).

For Gregory Rodrigues: - Accurate in recent predictions for wins against Brad Tavares and Denis Tiuliulin. - Missed on the Chidi Njokuani fight, where Rodrigues won despite being predicted to lose.

The model's mixed performance, particularly with Duncan, and his limited UFC experience suggest caution in interpreting the prediction.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI favors Christian Leroy Duncan, but this middleweight clash at UFC 304 promises to be closely contested. Duncan's precise striking, impressive defense, and reach advantage give him an edge on paper. However, Rodrigues's aggressive style, well-rounded skill set, and recent performances make him a dangerous opponent.

The key to victory for Duncan likely lies in maintaining distance, utilizing his superior striking differential, and exploiting Rodrigues's tendency to absorb damage. Rodrigues may look to close the distance, potentially mixing in takedowns to leverage his grappling advantage.

Given the knockout power both fighters possess and their recent finishing performances, fans should be prepared for a potential early stoppage. However, the short-notice nature of the fight for Rodrigues and Duncan's home advantage add intriguing variables to this exciting matchup.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Sam Patterson vs Kiefer Crosbie

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Sam Patterson to Win

Score: 22 Odds: Sam Patterson: -360 Kiefer Crosbie: 260

Sam Patterson's Breakdown

Sam Patterson, the 28-year-old welterweight, brings an impressive 11-2-1 record to this bout. Standing at 6'3" with a 78" reach, Patterson's physical attributes are formidable. His UFC journey has been a tale of resilience, rebounding from a KO/TKO loss in his debut to secure a first-round submission victory over Yohan Lainesse in January 2024.

Patterson's game is a well-rounded mix of striking and grappling. His diverse striking arsenal is complemented by his ability to maintain distance, leveraging his significant height and reach advantage. On the ground, Patterson's submission skills are a constant threat, averaging 4.55 takedowns and submission attempts per fight with a perfect 100% takedown accuracy.

Recent performances have shown Patterson's ability to adapt and overcome, winning four of his last five fights. His submission victory over Lainesse at UFC 297 particularly highlighted his opportunistic grappling.

Kiefer Crosbie's Breakdown

At 34 years old, Kiefer Crosbie enters this fight with a 10-4-0 record. Standing at 5'11" with a 70" reach, Crosbie gives up significant size to Patterson. His UFC debut in September 2023 ended in a submission loss to Kevin Jousset, but his overall career win percentage of 71.43% speaks to his capabilities.

Crosbie's striking is his primary weapon. He's a dynamic striker with dangerous kicks and knockout power, landing an impressive 8.10 significant strikes per minute with 66.10% accuracy. His leg kicks, landing 2.08 per minute, could be a key factor in closing the distance against the taller Patterson.

However, Crosbie's grappling abilities are less prominent in his record, which could be a significant disadvantage against Patterson's submission threat.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Size Discrepancy: Patterson's 8-inch reach advantage is crucial, allowing him to control distance and potentially frustrate Crosbie's attempts to close in.
  • Striking vs Grappling: While Crosbie excels in striking, Patterson's diverse skill set and submission threat make him dangerous in all areas.
  • Recent Form: Patterson's recent victory contrasts with Crosbie's loss, potentially impacting their confidence levels.
  • Age Factor: At 28, Patterson may have a slight edge in athleticism over the 34-year-old Crosbie.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The significant betting odds in Patterson's favor heavily influenced the model's prediction.
  • Reach: Patterson's substantial reach advantage is a key factor in the model's decision.
  • TrueSkill: Patterson's lower TrueSkill rating paradoxically increased his prediction score, possibly indicating perceived room for improvement.
  • Striking Metrics: Despite Crosbie's apparent advantages in striking stats, Patterson's overall striking impact and output differentials slightly favored him in the model's calculation.

Past Model Performance

The model's track record for these fighters is limited, with an incorrect prediction for Patterson's last fight against Lainesse. This misfire suggests caution in interpreting the current prediction. The lack of data on Crosbie predictions adds further uncertainty.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI favors Sam Patterson, aligning with the analysis of their physical attributes and recent performances. Patterson's combination of reach advantage, diverse striking, and submission skills present a formidable challenge for Crosbie. To win, Crosbie must find a way to navigate Patterson's reach, possibly using feints and leg kicks to set up power punches. However, this strategy risks exposing him to Patterson's grappling.

The fight dynamics are likely to see Patterson controlling distance with his jab and long strikes, while looking for opportunities to clinch or take the fight to the ground. Crosbie's best chance lies in closing the distance effectively without falling into Patterson's submission traps.

Given Patterson's recent form, physical advantages, and well-rounded skill set, he appears to be the justified favorite.

SHAP Chart

Analysis: Modestas Bukauskas vs Marcin Prachnio

WolfTicketsAI Predicts Marcin Prachnio to Win

Score: 2 Odds: Modestas Bukauskas: -174 Marcin Prachnio: 136

Modestas Bukauskas's Breakdown

"The Baltic Gladiator" Bukauskas enters this bout with a 15-6 record, looking to bounce back from his recent KO loss to Vitor Petrino. His UFC journey has been tumultuous, but he showed promise with two unanimous decision victories before his last setback. Bukauskas's striking game has evolved, particularly his ability to control distance and land significant strikes. His switch-stance approach, alternating between orthodox and southpaw, makes him unpredictable and difficult to read.

In his victories over Tyson Pedro and Zac Pauga, Bukauskas demonstrated excellent footwork, timing, and the ability to control fights over three rounds. However, his chin remains a concern, with multiple KO/TKO losses on his record. This vulnerability to power shots could be exploited by a heavy-handed opponent like Prachnio.

Marcin Prachnio's Breakdown

Prachnio, with a 17-7 record, comes into this fight riding the momentum of a unanimous decision victory over Devin Clark. His UFC career has been marked by resilience, bouncing back from an 0-3 start to win four of his last six fights. Prachnio's kyokushin karate background brings a unique striking style to the octagon, characterized by powerful kicks and punches.

His recent performances have showcased improved fight IQ and cardio. Against Clark, Prachnio demonstrated his ability to outwork his opponent over three rounds, balancing aggressive striking with better defensive awareness. His constant stance switches and diverse striking arsenal make him a difficult puzzle for opponents to solve.

Analysis and Key Points

  • Striking Styles: Bukauskas's switch-stance approach vs Prachnio's karate-influenced striking creates an intriguing stylistic matchup.
  • Recent Form: Both fighters have shown improvement, with Prachnio winning four of his last six and Bukauskas winning two before his recent loss.
  • Power Differential: Prachnio's knockout power poses a significant threat to Bukauskas's sometimes vulnerable chin.
  • Fight IQ: Both fighters have displayed improved strategic approaches in recent bouts.
  • Reach Advantage: Bukauskas's 4-inch reach advantage (78" vs 74") could be crucial if he maintains distance.

Understanding the Prediction

  • Odds: The betting odds favor Prachnio significantly, a key factor in the model's decision.
  • Recent Win Percentage: Prachnio's more consistent recent performances boost confidence in his chances.
  • Striking Impact: Prachnio's power striking gives him an edge, despite Bukauskas's overall higher output.
  • Defensive Vulnerabilities: Bukauskas's history of KO losses is a major concern against a powerful striker like Prachnio.
  • Grappling Wild Card: While both prefer striking, Bukauskas's willingness to mix in takedowns could be a factor if he struggles on the feet.

Past Model Performance

For Modestas Bukauskas: - The model incorrectly predicted his last two victories, underestimating his improvements. - Correctly predicted his loss to Vitor Petrino, highlighting awareness of his vulnerabilities.

For Marcin Prachnio: - Mixed results in recent predictions, suggesting caution in interpreting the current forecast. - The model's inconsistency for both fighters adds uncertainty to this prediction.

Conclusion

WolfTicketsAI predicts a victory for Marcin Prachnio, but this fight is far from certain. Prachnio's power striking and improved strategic approach give him an edge, but Bukauskas's switch-stance style and reach advantage could pose problems. The key likely lies in Prachnio's ability to close distance and exploit Bukauskas's defensive vulnerabilities, while Bukauskas will need to utilize his reach and improved striking to keep Prachnio at bay.